Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
Continuity Errors
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Omega: [QB] [i]Klingon first contact happening prior to 2218[/i] Something that wasn't canon to begin with. [i]Klingon forehead appearance being bumpy[/i] We don't know the story behind this, so there's no reason to assume it's a problem. [i]Enterprise design being "too advanced" for the 22nd Century[/i] In some opinions. [i]Starfleet being in existence in prior to 2161[/i] Again, no statement to this effect, and even if there had been such, it's not the same Starfleet. [i]A primitive prototype transporter system in operation prior to 2209[/i] Problem being? [i]A Vulcan serving as an observer on a Starfleet vessel prior to Spock[/i] Again, problem being? [i]The Suliban and Phlox being prominent alien cultures that were never seen/mentioned in TOS, TNG, DS9, or Voyager[/i] Yet again, problem being? [i]The Suliban and Phlox being prominent alien cultures that were never seen/mentioned in TOS, TNG, DS9, or Voyager[/i] Further still... [i]One console on the bridge for flight control instead of a helm and navigation stations[/i] Again... [i]The use of the familiar Trek hull font on the Enterprise[/i] And yet again... [i]The existence of another ship named Enterprise prior to the NCC-1701 that is not the Fandom Declaration-class starliner[/i] Give me an exact quote that makes this a problem. [i]The use of the registry NX-01 and that's not being used by the Dauntless[/i] Again, not a problem, because we have no idea how Starfleet's registry scheme works. So to sum, there ARE no continuity issues as yet. Have a nice day. :D [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3