Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
Why we've never heard of the NX-01 before...?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Timo: [QB] In any case, the Seawolf is still a USN vessel, registered during the same "epoch" as the Los Angeleses and the Virginias, even if there is no obvious sequence or logic to the SSN numbering between these classes. The NX-01 in turn is run by an organization very different from the one that was supposed to have christened and registered the NX-01*A. The USN wouldn't worry much about giving, say, the registry "DD-2001" to a new destroyer, even if the very same registry was in use on contemporary British, German or Russian vessels. UFP Starfleet thus might not pay much heed to the existence of Archer's ship when registering its first Dauntless class starship in 2163... Timo Saloniemi P.S. Do modern subs even have pennant numbers on the sail? How could the Los Angeles crew identify the Seawolf registry? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3