Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
Rumor: Paramounts selects new series!
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by PsyLiam: [QB] First, I want to know where the "twenty years between Star Wars films" figure came from. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Return of the Jedi was 1983, and The Phantom Menace was 1999. That, to me, is 16 years. Plus the fact that, apart from that, the films have all (or will all) come out 2-3 years after each other, suggests to me that someone is talking out of their bottom. Now, everyone else can shut up. Both Star Wars and Trek are good. They are different beasts. They please different people. Natch. B5 is better though. [IMG]http://flare.solareclipse.net/smile.gif[/IMG] Haven't the books been called something Marvel like, something like "Star Trek: year one"? And haven't Michael Jan Friedman's been extremely successful? Previously incuable insomniancs have now been able to get to sleep without any trouble. Hey, anyone remember when Star Trek books used to have different plots? The books by people other than Peter David I mean? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3