Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
The $poiler-$trewn $tar Trek Movie Rumour Di$cu$$ion Thread (Did I mention $poiler$?)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Nim: [QB] As boring as this offtopic stuff is... Van, I don't have a "slavish" devotion to the movie, that's black/white thinking, I got mild enthusiasm. No high expectations, any more than I had for Nemesis or "Cloverfield", so I probably won't be disappointed, like I wasn't with those. I reserve high expectations for movies based on books I like or movies based on some really significant event I relate to. Those smileys really aren't enough to change your jab to "just messing around", so be responsible. I attacked your remark, not you, I don't think you are a punk and don't want you to talk like one, I wanted you to raise the bar. I stick to my guns though, the pre-release hype material can be just as misleading in a dissapointing way (Hitchhiker's Guide, Sky Captain, Indiana Jones XVI) as it can be surpassing (Sunshine, Cube, Se7en, in my opinion). So I withhold judgement. Shit, I half-expected McCain to win. Mars Need Womens: [QUOTE]We just got to 2 new ship designs in how many years?[/QUOTE][i]Thank[/i] you. Saves me from quoting the Eric Idle-song and bringing out the guitar. Starship "Exceptional Person": [QUOTE]Everytime I see the ship, I want to grab it by the nacelle and flip it. It looks wrong somehow to have the deflector on top and the nacelle below...[/QUOTE]Yes me too. The closest we've come before I guess is the Intrepid, with a deflector in nose-level? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3