Again .. Archer is like a little kid as he finds that he's following the biggest comet any human has ever seen. I know they want him to be gung-ho .. but sheesh ... it's like Mayweather has seen more than him. But anyways...
I liked this episode .. T'Pol is finally becoming part of the crew .. and the exchanges between Tucker and T'Pol were great... I like seeing that kind of intimacy (no ..not in that way)! But it is still paralleled by the relationship between the Doc and Seven... but it's a start.
They let Reed blow some more stuff up .. Gotta love that guy... and I especially found the scene where they are contacting children back home humorous...
"I'm a space-explorer, Jim, not a teacher!!"
Everyone was uncomfortable .. and I found it funny..
as I said.. I really enjoyed the ep..
Thoughts?
My favorite moment was when finally the mystery of the existance of the toilets got answered by "expert" Trip.
Other good scenes were the vulcan ship,
dinner with the vulcan captain, snowman on the comet, blowing up the vulcan snowman, and T'pols story was enjoyable though predicatable.
As a tech nut, i have to say the color scheme of the vulcan ships seems to be dark orange, or at least for this era, and they must be years and years ahead of the Enterprise.
Which is good, no sense everyone in this time frame are as backwards as the humans.
[ November 07, 2001: Message edited by: TheF0rce ]
It was a nice episode ... some light moments ... the end sequence reminded me a bit *too* much of "Deep Impact", Paramount's '98 "Armageddon" copy.
Mind you, I just like seeing paragraphs, and sentences, and correct punctuation ... hell, I forget what an "adverb" is ... I just like being able to *read* a post without my mind spinning like crazy.
They...they switch Enterprise with Temptation Island! That's so sick!! AAAARRRGGHHH!
quote:
Originally posted by David Templar:
*chews through duranium/tritanium alloy hull plating*They...they switch Enterprise with Temptation Island! That's so sick!! AAAARRRGGHHH!
Hahaha.
Sorry i feel you.
Well maybe you can enjoy that Special Unit 2 show afterwards.
You failed to capitalize *I'm*.
Then you failed to capitalize *I*!
SMACK-DOWN!
[ November 07, 2001: Message edited by: Malnurtured Snay ]
Speaking of which, what the hell was with the design? I only got a few glances at it, but the design was very un-Vulcan.
[ November 07, 2001: Message edited by: MIB ]
Bwahahahahaha
Take that ya grammer nazi
Btw, was the Vulcans really spying on the Enterprise?
There should have been some mention of last episodes events.
[ November 07, 2001: Message edited by: TheF0rce ]
Did the ring spin? Where was that tractor beam coming out of? Where was the engines?
I want to get a gold star on my grammar report
honest
Oopse, "honest" isn't capitalized, there goes that star.
hehehehehe
Taste shotgun, bitch.
*KA-BOOM!*
*KA-BOOM!*
"Counter-Terrorists Win"
(DEAD)Veers: "Doh!"
(DEAD)The FOrce: "that was suki suky"
Malnurtured Snay: "Shotty rules!"
[ November 07, 2001: Message edited by: Malnurtured Snay ]
And the ring is the engine.
*gets a boot to the head by Galvetron*
Galvetron: Damn it! I told you! That is my catch phrase!
Me: sorry. *mutters under his breath* What an ass.
I'm curious as to where the ring was attached.
It kills me, too, that the vulcan warp drive, invented by a human, is classified to the humans !!
It was a wonder earth never went to war with them... oh ya... that's right; they were enlightened!
BTW.. How was my grammar?
It seems pretty certain, though, that the Vulcan warp drive was not invented by humans. Back in DS9 "Little Green Men", Quark gloated over the chance to see the secret of warp to the cultures of the past. He claimed that, thanks to the time-travel capability he had just gained, he could sell the tech to the past Ferengi so that they could have it "before the humans, the Klingons, even the Vulcans".
While this does not specify a date for the invention of warp by these respective races, it does make it sound as if each of them got the drive at a different time. It may be that the Vulcans invented it first, then the Klingons stole it from them, and then Cochrane invented the human version. Or perhaps all of them really stole it from somebody else, save for Cochrane. Or it may be that we can't get such accurate information out of Quark's words at all. But we *can* claim that these four races (Ferengi, Klingon, human, Vulcan) got the warp drive at different times. That is, if we trust Quark.
Timo Saloniemi
"...the vulcan warp drive, invented by a human..."
You've got to be joking...
quote:
It's based on the Apollo-class (T'Pau-type for those in denial) from "Unification".
I don't care what the Encyclopedia says...that ship we saw in Unification was NOT an Apollo class ship. The Gage model built for Emissary was an Apollo class ship.
And before Mighty Monkey of Mim starts his whining, yes I know that since the footage wasn't shown, it's not canon. But it was intended to be shown, and that's good enough for me.
Man, I wish someone had Rob Legato's email address...
[ November 08, 2001: Message edited by: Dukhat ]
I've also heard that Bernd gave 'The Andorian Incedent' a 1 out of 10! WTF?!?!? UP YOURS BERND!!!! THE ANDORIAN INCEDENT ROCKED AND YOU KNOW IT!
Vulcans probably invented Vulcan warp drive.
Which, Quark's nebulous and unsatisfying conversational reference to Vulcan warp drive notwithstanding, we still know they had first.
In First Contact, Zefram Cochrane used Human warp drive for the first time. It caught the Vulcans attention, and they warped over to see that we had warp. How did they warp over? With their PRE EXISTING VULCAN WARP DRIVE.
sheesh.
Of course I could be mistakenly taking the book FEDERATIONS at its word... But it was my understanding that the Vulcans didn't have warp technology at first contact.
*shrug* Somebody set me straight!
Us sharing warp drive with them would be like sharing a sandwich with someone who had a huge plate of thanksgiving dinner infront of them. They already have food and they have better food. They wouldnt need to bother with ours.
And even though i disagree with the way the Vulcans act and their control freak methods, i give them credit for not handing advanced warp drives to every race on the block. Thats the Prime Directive, and it makes sense.
[ November 09, 2001: Message edited by: TheF0rce ]
The only thing I don't like about the ship at all is that that the ring is apparently attached to the hull only at one point. Even if the SIF is mainly keeping the ship in one piece, there are *huge* lever forces at the slightest movement which could be reduced a lot by just adding a few small struts (like in a bike wheel). The way it is, the design is anything but logical (even if it is meant as a homage to the SS Enterprise).
MIB: I should answer the question why I hated TAI in another thread...
Dunno. The basic criterium is met anyway: the ship looks cool.
Now, what kind of variation could we have here? Just different hull shapes within the hoop? Two or more hoops parallel or in series? Are hull components outside the hoop forbidden? There seems to be both more and less choice here than with the nacelle-based designs.
Timo Saloniemi
quote:
Originally posted by Timo:
Now, what kind of variation could we have here? Just different hull shapes within the hoop? Two or more hoops parallel or in series? Are hull components outside the hoop forbidden? There seems to be both more and less choice here than with the nacelle-based designs.
Every time I've seen the "Hoopship Enterprise" there's been a gap in the ring inidcating that it was actually two in tandem. Indeed, I believe the schematic Jim Stevenson had reflected this.
I'm still not sure how the ring-warp system works, any ideas?
The problem comes in with maneuvering. With only two field producing elements in the ship's propulsion, the resultant warp fields are less adjustable. Assuming that subspace fields are responsible for sublight and FTL maneuvering, this tranlates into significant maneuverability limitations across the board.
Though hoop ships may be simpler systems (and thus, more desirable), the performance differance is just too great.
A supplementary reason might be that a hoop design limits design possibilities. Where you could theoretically slap two (or more, or less) nacelles on pretty much anything, a hoop ship would require a more integrated design which might not allow the options of a naccelle system.
And an airplane analogy just hit me: consider the relationship between rings and nacelles to be analogous between propeller and jet engines. Propellers/Rings are less efficient but simpler. Where as Jets/Nacelles are more efficient but more complicated. When the technology progressed to the point where Jets/Nacelles were reliable enough to be used, they became the standard.
[ November 12, 2001: Message edited by: OnToMars ]