T O P I C ��� R E V I E W
|
Hobbes
Member # 138
|
posted
Well it's official. Enterprise was called NX-class (not Enterprise-class) by both Archer and Mayweather. Also that more are on the way, 3 more according to Mayweather.
|
TheF0rce
Member # 533
|
posted
I wonder what other class of "starships" does starfleet employs? NW?[ November 21, 2001: Message edited by: TheF0rce ]
|
Malnurtured Snay
Member # 411
|
posted
It does sound kind of boring, yes.
|
TSN
Member # 31
|
posted
F0rce: At least "J" and "Y", apparently.
|
Malnurtured Snay
Member # 411
|
posted
Um ... no, it doesn't. Those freighters weren't Starfleet. I think he's refering to the class of ship that was 3 weeks away.
|
TSN
Member # 31
|
posted
I think he was expressing dislike for the "letters-for-class-names" system. I was just pointing out the other examples we have so far.And we don't know that ESF (Earth Starfleet) doesn't use those classes, anyway.
|
Timo
Member # 245
|
posted
Heck, we know that UFP Starfleet does, in the Pike/Kirk era. At least for training duty. And assuming the class J there is the same as the class J here.I'm personally not opposed to letter designations at all. It gives the space service a flavor of its own, separate from previous aeronautical and naval practices. And I think it's just a plus that it's also separate from the later pseudo-naval Starfleet practices. Timo Saloniemi
|
Proteus
Member # 212
|
posted
NX-Class.. or Ennex-Class? hehe
|
MIB
Member # 426
|
posted
Oh god. Here we go.
|
Malnurtured Snay
Member # 411
|
posted
You know, when Target Employee fixes on something, he does it good. This is probably the 10th post that mentions the "J-Class".
|
TSN
Member # 31
|
posted
I think you must be the one "fixing" on things. Like you're so fixed on complaining about TE and the J class, that you accuse him of talking about it in threads he hasn't even posted to...
|