It almost seems to me that both NASA and Star Trek are in same predicament. Both have a long and proud history, both have had problems with current projects, and both have had supporters wondering when, it at all, it's going to make a comeback. The big difference: NASA's got taxpayer dollars behind it, of course it's going to make some sort of comeback.
It's pretty cool that NASA seems to have some Star Trek fans among its PR people, though. One wonders how many NASA employees got their start watching Star Trek.
Posted by Balaam Xumucane (Member # 419) on :
They've also got some wicked bad Flash developers. Big ups for that site design.
Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
Yay! Andy Thomas! (Australia's first Astronaught.)
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
Well, that's not a very nice thing to call him...
Posted by Cartman (Member # 256) on :
"Astronaught"? The first guy to have sex in space?
Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
Oh, I'm sure *that's* been done before.
Does it make me a bad person that I was paying more attention to the monitors on the Enterprise bridge set than I was to what Bakula was saying? It looked like the NX-01 schematic, but you can never be too sure...