This is topic Review of Broken Bow. (spoilers!!!!) First review I think! in forum Other Television Shows at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/4/169.html

Posted by MIB (Member # 426) on :
 
Please forgive the bad spelling and punctuation. I wrote this in a very quick manner so I can pride my self with posting the very first Enterprise review on Flare.

The premier was quite interesting. As expected, Berman re-wrote just about everything established in TOS in the very first episode and overall, it didn't fit with the "normal" Star Trek timeline, however, IMO, it did provide an interesting story involving the Sebulan and these shodowy guys from the future. (Evil Braxton from series ? maybe??) The special effects were good and I discovered that the Enterprise wasn't that identical from the Akira class ship. However, they still do look similar. The Enterprise can apparently take one hell of a beating despite the fact that it doesn't have any shields.

Basically the whole thing starts when a Klingon ship crash lands at a farm with 2 Sebulan operatives chasing him. After a spine chilling display from one of the Sebulan flatening itself out to slip under a door, the Klingon manages to kill them both only to get blasted by a local farmer. The klingon survived and while Archer and company was trying to get him back to his homeworld they waste no time in letting him get kidnapped by the Sebulan. After a trip to Rigel 10 (a planet that is undoubtably part of the galactic 3rd world) and Archer getting shot in the leg by a Sebulan phaser, the crew finds out that the Klingon was trying to get a message to the Klingon Empire informing them that rouge factions of the Empire haven't been staging the attacks against other rouge factions or something like that. It was the Sebulans all along. Now the crew of the Enterprise must find the Klingon. They follow a Sebulan ship to their home base inside a large Gas/liquid planet where they promptly find the kidnapped Klingon inside a not-so-massive structure mad from seemingly hundreds of tiny Sebulan fighters. After capturing a fighter the crew pulls the whole Trojan Horse thing to infiltrate the base, grab the Klingon and bolt! A while later they deliver the Klingon to the homeworld.

I'm not gonna bore you with other details, but over all it was a good story and it's obviously not the last we've seen of the Sebulan or their shadowy leader. If I may suggest one thing, if it's not too late for you. Don't have dinner while watching this episode of Enterprise. Especally during the scene where Archer prides himself with his first Sebulan kill on Enterprise and Phlox decided to pride himself with his first Sebulan disection on Enterprise! YEE-HAW!

Good points:

Good story.

Kick ass effects.

The Enterprise wasn't so Akira-like as previously thought.

A good dose of T@A during the Rigel 10 scenes. (a.k.a. the galactic third world.)

Kick ass cameo from Ol' Z as Lily would call him. (Was that the same actor from ST:FC or somebody else?)

Bad points: Berman, to nobody's surprise, re-wrote everything that has been established in TOS. (phasers, transporters, early first contact with the Klingons, the fact that we even MADE contact with the Sebulan ect. ect.)

T'Pol is rather touchy and emotional one moment and just like a typical Vulcan the next. Typical mood-swings that are associated with Vulcan PMS?

Overall 1-10 rating: 8

Aside from the fact that Berman decided to ignore what had been established in the previous series, he has done quite well with the Enterprise preimer. However, I'm not celebrating just yet! I think all of you remember that the Voyager premier was quite good too, and just look what happened!


Bon apetite!!! Or something similar.

[ September 26, 2001: Message edited by: MIB ]


 
Posted by MIB (Member # 426) on :
 
One more thing. Try not to get freaked out by Phlox's super-ultra smile.
 
Posted by TheF0rce (Member # 533) on :
 
man that smile scared me!

also the shadowy leader was a romulan...bwhahahahahaha

betting good money here boys

the whole trojan horse bit sucked....the sulliban sensors must be crappier than our heros on the Pre-E.
 


Posted by Ryan McReynolds (Member # 28) on :
 
I'm curious about some points...

quote:
Originally posted by MIB:
Berman, to nobody's surprise, re-wrote everything that has been established in TOS. (phasers,

There were no phasers in Enterprise... where is the contradiction?

quote:
Originally posted by MIB:
transporters

The original series never mentioned when transporters were invented. "Realm of Fear" (TNG) establishes that they were invented before 2209. Enterprise is before 2209... where is the contradiction?

quote:
Originally posted MIB:
early first contact with the Klingons

The original series never mentioned when first contact with the Klingons occurred. "First Contact" (TNG) establishes that it was centuries before the 2360s. Enterprise is centuries before the 2360s... where is the contradiction?

quote:
Originally posted by MIB:
the fact that we even MADE contact with the Sebulan

The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, and Voyager never mentioned the fact that we even MADE contact with the Organians in the original series, a race certainly as mention-worthy as the Suliban. Are these series, then, inconsistent as well? Assuming the Suliban essentially keep quiet after the 2150s, why would the be mentioned later?

quote:
Originally posted by MIB:
Aside from the fact that Berman decided to ignore what had been established in the previous series

Please provide an example. I haven't seen any, yet.

Just for fun, a few of the nice continuity touches.

  • The doors sound like the original series doors.
  • The communicators have the original series flick-chirp.
  • The science station has a pop-up monitor, just like Spock's did.
  • Sato used an earpiece, just like Uhura did.

    [ September 26, 2001: Message edited by: Ryan McReynolds ]


     
    Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
     
    MIB has apparently spent too much time listening to all the nay-sayers without spending one moment actually analyzing any of what they're bitching about.
     
    Posted by MIB (Member # 426) on :
     
    When they mention "phase pistols" I assume they mean phasers. Either way, I stand corrected. Would anyone mind if I started regarding Enterprise to be kind of the re-make of TOS and that TOS is unofficial trek?
     
    Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
     
    Yes.
     
    Posted by MIB (Member # 426) on :
     
    hmmmm I should have worded that better. ok. I'm not gonna consider the "look" of TOS official, but I am gonna continue to recognize the stories as official Trek.

    It will be interesting to see just how the Vulcans got from over-protective and restrictive to "just another member of the Federation" within a mere 100 or so years. With Vulcans, that is hardly a long time.
     


    Posted by Ryan McReynolds (Member # 28) on :
     
    quote:
    Originally posted by MIB:
    hmmmm I should have worded that better. ok. I'm not gonna consider the "look" of TOS official, but I am gonna continue to recognize the stories as official Trek.

    That's similar to how I do it. Really, though, the "look" could stay the same; it's how they achieve the look that I mentally edit. For example, in my internal version of the original series:

  • Those bridge screens actually change to show relevant information and it's animated.
  • The alien planets have horizons farther than ten meters away, and occasionally clouds in the sky.
  • The lighting and standard television makeup aren't 60-style, so nobody looks so greasy.

    Stuff like that. It's not neccessary to change production design so much as production techniques. The Enterprise can look the same, just make it CGI and light it realistically.

    quote:
    Originally posted by MIB:
    With Vulcans, [100 years] is hardly a long time.

    Indeed. If T'Pol is 65 in 2151 (as Jolene Blalock says in interviews), then she'd be 170 at the beginning of the original series, the equivalent of maybe 60 for a human. It's only a matter of time before this finds its way into a novel...
     


    Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
     
    Though I can't, of course, say where Enterprise is heading, I think we should take into account that the situation is going to change a great deal between this time and the 24th century. (Keeping in mind that the Vulcans didn't seem a very big part of the Federation during TOS. Not that the Federation itself was featured all that much.)

    For one thing, the Vulcans might be aware of some potentially dangerous aliens not too far from Earth that might even have some sort of connection with Vulcan. Why, if humans just ran out and made independant contact with these mysterious aliens, they might develop all sorts of crazy ideas...
     


    Posted by MIB (Member # 426) on :
     
    quote:
    Originally posted by Ryan McReynolds:

    That's similar to how I do it. Really, though, the "look" could stay the same; it's how they achieve the look that I mentally edit. For example, in my internal version of the original series:


    Those bridge screens actually change to show relevant information and it's animated.

    The alien planets have horizons farther than ten meters away, and occasionally clouds in the sky.

    The lighting and standard television makeup aren't 60-style, so nobody looks so greasy.

    Stuff like that. It's not neccessary to change production design so much as production techniques. The Enterprise can look the same, just make it CGI and light it realistically.


    Similar? That is exactly how I do it. I also invision the Enterprise to look more metallic and high-tech rather than it looking like a plastic model hung up on strings. I also invision something in the engineering room. A warp core, anti-matter tank, ANYTHING!! One more thing I do is invision exactly what the dot-of-light ships ACTUALLY look like. IE: the Gorn and the Orion vessels. I usually invision them to look as they do in the game Starfleet Command.
     


    Posted by Harry (Member # 265) on :
     
    A Question from someone who won't be able to see Enterprise this year:

    Where there any tricorder-ish devices? If so, how did they look?
     


    Posted by Ryan McReynolds (Member # 28) on :
     
    quote:
    Originally posted by Harry:
    Where there any tricorder-ish devices? If so, how did they look?

    Archer used a smallish scanner that was about the size of a PDA. They never called it a "tricorder" and they never mentioned its capabilities, so it may be a specialized life-form reader (since that was it's use).
     


    Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
     
    My friend and i theorized it was a special effect detector.. it went crazy when he found future guys corridor.
     
    Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
     
    Interesting to note that the scanner could detect the weird room, but apparently not tell Archer anything concrete about it. He certainly didn't seem to expect it to be as weird as it was.
     
    Posted by Yakaspat The Trekker (Member # 355) on :
     
    I have to concur with Ryan on all points. I felt the new show remained consistent, and that they adequately created props to look like they are futuristic for us, but old for TNG. All in all, I loved the new show.

    One gripe: The Klingon Homeworld is only 4 days away from Earth????

    Lance
    www.thetrekker.org
     


    Posted by Ryan McReynolds (Member # 28) on :
     
    quote:
    Originally posted by MIB:
    I also invision the Enterprise to look more metallic and high-tech rather than it looking like a plastic model hung up on strings.

    Ironic, since the original Enterprise model was neither plastic nor hung on strings.

    It was mostly painted wood, and held on a stand for filming not unlike later starships. Furthermore, the actual model is far more detailed than people realize from watching the show. In my opinion, the original Enterprise looked more like this or this (with proper lighting, of course) than this. Note that all three images are of the same model, though in the first two it had been restored by Ed Miarecki for the Smithsonian exhibit.
     


    Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
     
    I am somewhat partial to the "Trials and Tribble-ations" version, though. What a pretty ship.
     
    Posted by Ryan McReynolds (Member # 28) on :
     
    quote:
    Originally posted by Sol System:
    I am somewhat partial to the "Trials and Tribble-ations" version, though. What a pretty ship.

    Yeah, that was nice. Actually, I'd like to see someone with 3D modeling skills take an accurate Constitution mesh and apply a movie-style Aztec pattern, leaving the hull markings, main section lines, and windows alone. No structural changes of any kind, just the hull. If I could see any evaluate it, that might ultimately be my preferred version of the original Enterprise... then again, it might not.
     


    Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
     
    It would be cool to see CGIs of the evolution from TOS to TMP 1701 (partially) shown by the 'in between ships' in Ships of the Star Fleet.. the
    >Bon Homme Richard-class -- shows the difference between the Cage enterprise (nacelle spires, tall bridge, big deflector) and the TOs enterprise (which had nacelle globes on the back & a smaller deflector)
    >Achernar-class (the version with all the grids on the hull like the Smithsonian revision),
    >Endeavour-class.. same as TOS revised Const., but with non-cylindrical warp nacelles
    >Constitution(II)-class (basically the Phase II Enterprise.. same saucer with grid, but with torpedo tubes, docking ports and very primitive versions of the TMP nacelles)
    >Tikopai-class (now with the TMP saucer, TOS engineering hull with TMP detailing, but in-between versions of the engines and struts)

    Of course, if any of those vessels were to be canon, they would be Constitution-class (variant) but its really interesting to see the evolution. If they ever do a special edition of 'The Ultimate computer' it would be nice if each of the four constitutions present had different features like those described to discern them in the chaos.

    the new show was cool too...
     


    Posted by Ryan McReynolds (Member # 28) on :
     
    quote:
    Originally posted by CaptainMike:
    >Achernar-class (the version with all the grids on the hull like the Smithsonian revision)

    The Smithsonian "revision" didn't add anything, it just made the already existing lines more noticeable; they were there from the beginning, but before the renovation they were just pencilled lines.

    The Achernar is Franz Joseph's highly innaccurate version of the Constitution from his Tech Manual with a larger, curvy secondary hull, reshaped nacelles, and a much more rounded "teardrop" assembly under the bridge.

    But yes, it does have the hull grids.
     


    Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
     
    you got it right about the bridge dome thing.. but the grid marks are a little more controversial.. Original model maker Richard C. Datin said in the July 1996 issue of Cinefantastique that, "The original model was smooth and didn't show any lines or marks, except for the lettering and numbers." The pencil lines were theorized to have been added by those who restored the original model when it toured various locales during the 1970s. This is also when the nacelle domes were lost or destroyed and replaced with simple 'blinkies.' Photos of the model from 1974 show no grids or markings, but in pictures taken by Jeff Brown in 1977 at the "Life in the Universe" exhibition at the Smithsonian, grid lines are evident. They appear to have been drawn on the upper saucer section with a pencil, but when they were added to the model (and by whom) is unclear. The grids were maintained as painting details in the 84 and again in the massive repainting Ed Miarecki did in 91, which leaves the Enterprise in its current (IMO overpainted) condition. So its definitely a revision, since the grid lines were not added until several years after the model was filmed, and never appeared on screen.
    see The IDIC Page- Enterprise model history
     
    Posted by Obi Juan (Member # 90) on :
     
    quote:
    I am somewhat partial to the "Trials and Tribble-ations" version, though. What a pretty ship.

    Me too.

    Was that CGI or fancy photograpy of the original model?
     


    Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :
     
    A new model, actually.
     
    Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
     
    built to exactly one-half the scale of the original model by Greg Jein. And masterfully so too.. it proves that if they went back to do TOS effect scenes wit new models it could be done gracefully.
     
    Posted by Ryan McReynolds (Member # 28) on :
     
    quote:
    Originally posted by CaptainMike:
    So its definitely a revision, since the grid lines were not added until several years after the model was filmed, and never appeared on screen.

    In any case, I definitely prefer the grid in place, and fairly strong. While Jeffries wanted the hull to be mostly smooth, every other starship has had something to break it up. The grid-lined version looks more consistent, and much more realistic, to my eyes.
     


    Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
     
    Actually, the Trials & Tribbleations Enterprise had very slight grid lines in the pattern established in the revision, so they are filmed canon. I dont mind them either..
    But i DO mind the grid lines as they appear on the Miarecki repainting in the Smithsonian are grotesque. He applied so much shadow (since the lines arent structural details but painted on, they need definition) but the ship looks burnt and rusted because of the heavily applied color. THAT is a violation of the original look of the ship
     
    Posted by Obi Juan (Member # 90) on :
     
    Yeah, it looks like an old, beat up ship.
     
    Posted by Ryan McReynolds (Member # 28) on :
     
    quote:
    Originally posted by Obi Juan:
    Yeah, it looks like an old, beat up ship.

    It was twenty years old... no other main series ship has been more than a year old when we see it.
     


    Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
     
    But the Enterprise wasnt supposed to look beat up during TOS.. it had been around the block a few times, but was still Starfleet's finest. The Miarecki repainting shows it if it had not been refit, or had been trapped in the Delta Quadrant for seven years or something, but is completely unrelated to the ship we saw in TOS.. It looks fine in 'Trials & Tribbleations without all the ugly shit on the hull!
     


    © 1999-2024 Charles Capps

    Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3