Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » "Second To Bear the Name..." (Page 1)

  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: "Second To Bear the Name..."
Evolved
Active Member
Member # 389

 - posted      Profile for Evolved     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Why is it that the various Enterprises have "x-th to bear the name" while other ships which have a name used on a previous ship (like the USS Defiant on DS9) do not have this little tidbit written on the plaque? It seems to me that it would be obvious that NCC-1701-E means the name Enterprise was used before while NCC-74205 does not. Thoughts?
Registered: Jul 2000  |  IP: Logged
MrNeutron
Senior Member
Member # 524

 - posted      Profile for MrNeutron     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The plaque's SHOULD day "nth ship to bear the registry and name", since the only distinction is that all Enterprises have the 1701 number.

--------------------
"Well, I mean, it's generally understood that, of all of the people in the world, Mike Nelson is the best." -- ULTRA MAGNUS, steadfast in curmudgeon

Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged
Mark Nguyen
I'm a daddy now!
Member # 469

 - posted      Profile for Mark Nguyen     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well, maybe the Enterprise is just THAT special...

Mark

--------------------
"This is my timey-wimey detector. Goes ding when there's stuff." - Doctor Who
The 404s - Improv Comedy | Mark's Starship Bridge Designs | Anime Alberta

Registered: Dec 2000  |  IP: Logged
Lee
I'm a spy now. Spies are cool.
Member # 393

 - posted      Profile for Lee     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The Enterprise is very special. In fact, I think they should do a series set on a ship named Enterprise again. 8)

--------------------
Never mind the Phlox - Here's the Phase Pistols

Registered: Jul 2000  |  IP: Logged
Aban Rune
Former ascended being
Member # 226

 - posted      Profile for Aban Rune     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
IIRC correctly, the Defiant on DS9 had a plaque that says (among other things) "First Starship of Her Class".

If it wasn't the Defiant, I know that there was a prototype ship that had that line on her plaque. The distinction of being the class ship would seem to be more important than the distinction of being another ship named Defiant.

--------------------
"Nu ani anqueatas"

Aban's Illustration
The Official Website of Shannon McRandle

Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
Harry
Stormwind City Guard
Member # 265

 - posted      Profile for Harry     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
U.S.S. MELBOURNE * EXCELSIOR CLASS * SECOND SHIP TO BEAR THE EXACT SAME REGISTRY [Roll Eyes]

--------------------
Titan Fleet Yards | Memory Alpha

Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Spike
Pathetic Vampire
Member # 322

 - posted      Profile for Spike     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
IIRC the Relativity had "Seventh ship to bear the name" on the plaque which is odd because it should be "Eight ship to bear the name".

--------------------
"Never give up. And never, under any circumstances, no matter what - never face the facts." - Ruth Gordon

Registered: Mar 2000  |  IP: Logged
Austin Powers
Slightly warped
Member # 250

 - posted      Profile for Austin Powers     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Didn't we agree that, by that time, they had changed the alphabet to explain that away? [Big Grin]

--------------------
Lister: Don't give me the "Star Trek" crap! It's too early in the morning.
- Red Dwarf "The Last Day"

Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709

 - posted      Profile for capped     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
They might have revamped the Alphabet by getting rid of 'C'.. its redundant.. use 'S' or 'K' instead. Same with 'X' you can achieve an 'X' by combining 'ks' or using a 'X'..

It would be a nice touch to have the script say Kaptain Brakston

--------------------
"Are you worried that your thoughts are not quite.. clear?"

Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
AndrewR
Resident Nut-cache
Member # 44

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Maybe it should say the "nth starship named 'Enterprise' as seen so far." The whole "Enterprise" TV show stuffs that wording up - that is currently on the plaque. Unless, yes it is only 1701-x Enterprises. This would cover why there is no "nth starship to bear the name Defiant" or "nth starship to bear the name Intrepid" - although we know there have been at least 2 3 Defiants and 3 Intrepids. Though they have all been of different registries... except now the Defiant - let me just fix that above...

Andrew

--------------------
"Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica." - Jim Halpert. (The Office)

I'm LIZZING! - Liz Lemon (30 Rock)

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709

 - posted      Profile for capped     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well, to be fair don't most of the plaques on the Enterprises imply its the nth Federation starship to bear the name.. the NX-01 isnt Federation.

--------------------
"Are you worried that your thoughts are not quite.. clear?"

Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
AndrewR
Resident Nut-cache
Member # 44

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well after "Enterprise" one would have to expect this. Actually before it - cause of the shuttle and the spaceship and the sailing ship etc. Does the plaque say "starship" or just "ship"?

--------------------
"Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica." - Jim Halpert. (The Office)

I'm LIZZING! - Liz Lemon (30 Rock)

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709

 - posted      Profile for capped     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
not sure about the plaque, but i was disappointed because 'starship' should be a 23rd century term, IMO, but Archer was saying it as early as the 2nd,3rd,4th episodes as i recall

--------------------
"Are you worried that your thoughts are not quite.. clear?"

Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Siegfried
Fullmetal Pompatus
Member # 29

 - posted      Profile for Siegfried     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
As far as Enterprise's dedication plaque goes, it simply says "Enterprise" followed by "Spacecraft Number NX-01" followed by "Jonathan Archer, Commander" followed by a massive list of people. The plaque makes no reference to "starship" or even that Enterprise is the first of the NX-class.

--------------------
The philosopher's stone. Those who possess it are no longer bound by the laws of equivalent exchange in alchemy. They gain without sacrifice and create without equal exchange. We searched for it, and we found it.

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
The_Tom
recently silent
Member # 38

 - posted      Profile for The_Tom     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
My thinking is that the "second to bear the name" on the plaque and whole registry suffix thing were originally just a once-off thing for the 1701-A to cash in on the Federation's Enterprise "hype" post-Genesis/Whale Song incidents. And then the next ship named Enterprise had to be NCC 1701-B with a "third to bear the name" line regardless of who its captain was and whether or not high expectations were placed on it because it would look bad as the honour had already given to 1701-A. And from there it became an Enterprise-only tradition.

--------------------
"I was surprised by the matter-of-factness of Kafka's narration, and the subtle humor present as a result." (Sizer 2005)

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3