Post A Reply my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » The Constitution Class dilemma- an Idea. » Post A Reply

Post A Reply Login Name: Password: Message: HTML is enabled. UBB Code™ is enabled. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Prowl Alpha: [QB] In my starship list, I have used the reasoning that the registry numbers are chronological. Yes I know that there are arguements against that train of thought. Well here is my personal solution to the Constitution Class and its dilemma of registry. Using the Okuda registry numbers. The Constellation and the Republic are not Constitution Class starships but rather just types, since the Constellation was shown on screen in that Constitution configuration. The Constellation, herself or itself, was not the exactly like the Enterprise. It was the minor details that would set it apart from the other 1700s Constitution. I assume the situation would be the same for the Republic. So instead of Constitution Class Heavy Cruiser Constellation, it would be Constellation Type Heavy Cruiser. Same for the Republic. The rest of the non-1700 Constitution Class would be organized into two other classes. The 1600s are to be organized as the Farragut Class after the Farragut NCC-1647. The two 1800s are to be organized as the Intrepid Class after the Intrepid NCC-1831. I am going with that the Intrepid was 1831 not 1631. The counterargument of not having two Intrepid Classes because it would be confusing would be pointless because of the two different time periods that each was set in. A real world example would be the Farragut Class Destroyers of World War I and Farragut Class Destroyers of the 1960s. [/QB][/QUOTE]

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™                                   What is UBB Code™?

Options Disable Graemlins in this post.

 

© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3