Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Akira the real deal...
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Mark Nguyen: [QB] *le sigh*... Here we go again... Look. If the Akira looks as old or older than the E-D to you, then you're with the arguable majority that agrees that NCCs are meant to be in chronological order and therefore that the ship is in fact older than the E-D, and were in existence back in the 2350s. If you think it looks newer than the E-D, then you're with a smaller but vocal minority that believes that the ships are in fact newer based mostly on their appearance, and that NCCs therefore make no sense whatsoever. Alternatively, you're with an even smaller minority that thinks that the Akira must be newer simply because there's no way that a ship that is so much cooler to you than the E-D could be older. Take your pick. There hasn't been a resolution here, in many, many years of argument. Mark [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3