Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
New shiplist format preview
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by newark: [QB] My suggestions: [b]USS AHWAHNEE NCC-2048[/b] I have this ship listed as Excelsior. This is based on the map shown in TUC. [b]USS ATLANTI(S) NCC-40657[/b] This ship is mentioned on a computer screen seen in "Conspiracy". Even if the name is not 100% certain, the registry is. [b]USS CHALLENGER NCC-2032[/b] I have this ship listed as Excelsior. This is based on the map shown in TUC. [b]USS CONCORD (E) NCC-68711[/b] According to StarTrek.Com, Concorde is the correct spelling for this ship. [b]USS CONSTITUTION NCC-1700[/b] On my ship list, I don't list the registry. My reason is this-the only known and recorded source for the connection between the name 'Constitution' and 'NCC-1700' are works authored by Franz Joseph and later discredited by Gene Roddenberry. There is no recorded connection between the name and registry in the first series. In the post-discredition process, a starship bearing the registry 'NCC-1700' is seen in "Datalore". She bears no name. So, for my records, there are two ships: the USS Constitution with a registry preceding NCC-956 and an unnamed Connie with the registry NCC-1700. [b]USS COURAGEOUS NCC-1861[/b] I see you are adding information from sketches and scripts. This ship is a sketch of a Soyuz Class starship located either in the Art of Star Trek or TNG: Continuing Missions. I don't see an issue in including her in a ship list and it's nice, I think, to have an additional name to the Soyuz Class. [b]USS DEFIANT NCC-75633[/b] My opinion is stated on this ship. :) [b]USS EAGLE NCC-956[/b] This is the second ship mentioned in the episode "Amok Time", not the 'Excalibur'. [b]USS ENDEAVOUR NCC-1718[/b] How did you create this connection between name and registry? [b]USS ESSEX NCC-1697[/b] Is the name supposed to be green? Is the registry supposed to be yellow? Is the class supposed to be gray? [b]USS FEDERATION NCC-2100[/b] Your selection of yellow for the starships USS Hermes NCC-585, USS Ptolemy NCC-3801, and USS Saladin NCC-500 would seen to indicate your preference for these ships to be canonical. If so, then this ship, too, must be in yellow. She is shown briefly in the TSFS on a computer display. [b]USS INTREPID NCC-1631[/b] The correct registry for this ship is NCC-1831. [b]USS LEXINGTON NCC-14427[/b] This ship didn't appear in "Thine Own Self". Her succesor, the Nebula Lexington, did. Wouldn't it be easier to state her as a ship from the Encyclopedia and say she is a predecessor to the Nebula Lexington? [b]USS MAGELLAN NCC-3069[/b] There appears to be a basic rule in Star Trek: canon overrules all other sources. In the battle plans to retake DS9, there are the 'shadows' of classes of ships engaged in the campaign. The Constellation is not among these classes. Ergo, the Magellan in the episode "Sacrifice of Angels" is not a Constellation. She could be of any one of the classes mentioned, just not a Constellation. [b]USS MELBOURNE NCC-62043[/b] I happen to think there is only one Melbourne and she is Excelsior. The Nebula Melbourne I see as a nameless casuality in the battle. [b]USS PROMETHEUS NX-74913[/b] I am of the camp which supports this connection, not the other connection. [b]USS RELATIVITY NCV-474439[/b] This ship is missing from your list. [b]USS SCOVIL NCC-1598[/b] I have the Scovil as Oberth Class based on a chart in TUC. [b]USS SHIKA MARU[/b] In the encyclopedia, this ship, 'Shika Maru', is identified as a starship. Starship = USS. [b]USS SPRINGFIELD NCC-1963[/b] I have this ship listed as Miranda Class based on a chart in TUC. [b]SERIES OF SHIPS NAMED AS YAMATO[/b] On my list, I have six ships named USS Yamato. The first ship has registry NCC-1305, the next four have no registries, and the last has NCC-71807. This adheres to the canon facts. [b]NCC-K7[/b] This is the registry for Deep Space Station K-7. A station is dissimiliar to a starship, so the inclusion of this registry is puzzling. [b]NCC-70231[/b] On my lists, I have this ship listed. A shuttle bearing a registry similiar to this was seen in "Identity Crisis". [b]SHIPS IN 'WHISPERS'[/b] You have listed several ships which may not be of Federation origion and may operate for the non-aligned governments. These are: G.S. 12, C.A.R. 54-D, C-57-D, I.T.A. Elmira, C.G.M. Gh'Aster, F.G.M.S. Gyt'Aerat, G.H.D. Per'ot, and G.C.S. Recio. [b]S.S. BEAGLE[/b] Her class is 4. [b]KOBAYASHI MARU[/b] Her class is 3. [b]S.S. MILAN NDT-50863[/b] The official website has this ship listed as U.S.S. Milan. [b]XHOSA[/b] In the encyclopedia, this ship has 'S.S.' attached to her name. [b]NCD-31775, YLT-3069[/b] These are the registries of two Toron-type shuttle. They may be Federation registered. [b]E.C.S. FORTUNATE[/b] On Ex Astra Scientia, the website author noticed this sequence of letters and numbers written on doors and other locations: 'ECS-2801'. He is of the opinion this could be a registry. I agree with him. [b]TEZRA[/b] In the episode, this ship is identified as the first of her class. Most cases in Star Trek, a class is named after the first ship. This would be a logical inference here. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3