Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
USS Endeavour, 1895 or 1695?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The First One: [QB] Well, as with all things FASA, the general response around here is "you can call it your left testicle for all we care." 8) According to my list, there are 4 canon ships with 18xx registries: the [i]Lantree[/i], NCC-1837, the [i]Emden[/i], NCC-1856, the [i]Reliant[/i], NCC-1864, and the [i]Endeavour[/i], NCC-1895. And of course there used to be 5 with the [i]Intrepid[/i] being corrected later. But just because there are two dozen other [i]Constitutions[/i] in the 1600s and 1700s doesn't mean there can't be at least one in the 1800s. After all, the [i]Emden[/i] is likely to be either a [i]Constitution[/i] or a [i]Miranda[/i]. . . but never mind that. If the registry is wrong, then the last known [i]Constitution[/i] is the [i]USS Defiant[/i], NCC-1764. I can't believe that in the 20+ years between the latest possible date of her construction and the appearance of the first [i]Excelsior[/i]-class that all they built were [i]Mirandas[/i], [i]Soyuzes[/i], and [i]Constellations[/i] (assuming the NX-1974 of the latter class ship is correct; where did this number come from anyway?). So, not enough information, IMO. And I don't like the idea of saying every figure you don't think sounds quite right must therefore be wrong. [This message has been edited by The First One (edited November 08, 1999).] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3