Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
The Cheyenne...
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Timo: [QB] Although the ship could basically be symmetrical, I'm sure there is some *minor* vertical asymmetry. Obviously, there won't e.g. be a bridge on the ventral side! The saucer deflector on the dorsal side looks ridicuously small, due to the altered scale of the saucer. It also doesn't much look like a deflector, what with being painted all coppery without a hint of blue. Thus, I'd like to imagine that the corresponding location on the ventral side was slightly modified so that there would be a bigger deflector there. Currently, there is no way of telling if Miarecki put something like that down there or not, so I'm free to have my little fantasy... Apart from that, I don't see major needs for asymmetry. The small Cheyenne probably won't need a Captain's Yacht, and the saucer underside isn't a likely spot for such currently-apparently-missing hardware as torpedo launchers or shuttlebays. I trust we can say that the torp launchers are on those vertical pylons, even though they appear smaller than the launchers of other ship types. And I trust we can say the shuttlebay is either on the aft surface of the saucer, or then omitted altogether (after all, not all wet-navy ships have helicopter hangars!). Timo Saloniemi [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3