Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
The Constitution Class dilemma- an Idea.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Phoenix: [QB] As 1700 is the Constitution, it would seem that numbers are assigned in blocks to Classes, with the Class ship taking the first number. Thus, 1647 should probably be part of a Class named after 1600 and 1831 should be part of a Class named after 1800. Likewise 1017 should be (or was originally) part of a Class named after 1000. As we don't know the names of 1000, 1600 and 1800, we could either call them "NCC-1000 Class" or "Constellation Type" for instance, but saying the entire Class is named for the one ship we happen to know the name of is a bit silly. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3