Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Oh God, not the Yeager again.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Sol System: [qb]From a distance, the "Yeager" "saucer" looks a lot like the Intrepid's. That doesn't mean it is, and it seems to me to be just as reasonable that it is a raider attached to some dagger-like front end as it is an Intrepid attached to some weirdo rear. Or, just as reasonable that both pieces are something else altogether, and ship always looked like it looks now. Or anything inbetween.[/qb][/QUOTE]Except for the fact that the studio model close ups show that the Intrepid saucer is complete with all its properly-scaled features. (Bridge, windows, et. al.) This thread is a bit of a coincidence as I was just going to start one about the Yeager myself. What I wanted to know is who was our original source at Paramount that told us the ship was designated as "Yeager." I don't seem to remember it as being Mike Okuda, though he later commented on the fact that it clashed with the Saber-class Yeager. Did that source call it a Yeager-class vessel? How did we get "Yeager-class" as a designation for the design? We now know that the individual ship is called the Yeager, and the DS9 TM says it's an Intrepid variant, but did a Paramount source also call it Yeager-class or was that just a misunderstanding on our part? -[b]MMoM[/b] :D [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3