Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
How about that third nacelle
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jason Abbadon: [QB] Ahem. [IMG]http://pic14.picturetrail.com/VOL544/657989/1301771/22724972.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://pic14.picturetrail.com/VOL544/657989/1301771/22724956.jpg[/IMG] The "Medusa" design kicks ass- I really dig it- far moreso than many other more popular kitbash designs (Challenger, Centaur, etc.). The design makes a lot of sense if you think a third nacelle can reduce the overall workload by a third (allowing a greater duration of high warp speeds). Particularly when you consider the amount of time it would take to cross the U.F.P. I've seen the ship configured with the third nacelle "up", but that looks like total shit, so I built mine "nacelle down" for that Oberth look I like so much. :cool: Look at it as generational predesessor to the Niagara class. As to artistic liscence, I made a few practical revisions- a connie refit bridge (the incorrectly scaled Excelsior bridge bugs me no end) and a few landing pads on the dorsal saucer mostly. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3