Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Akira the real deal...
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by CaptainMike: [QB] this is an exercise in futility. we know that registries are not derived in an exactly chronological manner, as the Constallation and Prometheus show us. But we also know that, under Okuda's guidance, TNG registries are supposed to show a ships general era (thats why he made a stink about the prometheus, it didnt fit his scheme) The Akira does fit his scheme, he didnt make a stink over it. Therefore he approves of it being, chronologically, from the era of other 6xxxx vessels (which is only a difference of about 10 years.. i dont see why it makes such a big difference whether its 2355 or 2365.. the ships probably still have a 75-80 year service lifetime anyway, and might even still be in construction either way.. who the fuck cares?) So, in my tally of this stupid-ass contest > CaptainMike gets 1,000,000 points for being Him > Dolph Lundgren and William Shatner are tied at 775,047 points > U//Magnus get 4,702 points for pointing fun at our foibles > Chrissy Starshade gets 10 points for pointing out something that everyone has known since they were seven. NCC-1017, you say? > The Tommy gets 42 points for getting the registries NCC-1203 and NCC-873467346387432 stuck in my head > Aban Runey, voice of reason, gets 27 points for a good post, as does Davey Templar, and 27 points to Timo for his age old suggestion of just 'ask the guys who are in charge and/or designed it' > KoySpedOyVeyo gets negative -3,000 points for contributing an annoying question and nothing else [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3