Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
The Constitution Class dilemma- an Idea.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Peregrinus: [QB] Canon ships before Okuda came in (which eliminates NX-1974 and everything else in Star Trek VI)... [i]Enterprise[/i] NCC-1701 ([i]Constitution[/i]-class) [TOS] [i]Antares[/i] (unseen, unknown registry or class) [TOS] [i]Valiant[/i] (unseen, unknown registry or class) [TOS] [unknown] NCC-1709 (unseen, class unknown -- presumed [i]Constitution[/i]) [TOS] [i]Intrepid[/i] NCC-1831 (unseen, class unknown) [TOS] [unknown] NCC-1703 (unseen, class unknown -- presumed [i]Constitution[/i]) [TOS] [unknown] NCC-1672 (unseen, class unknown) [TOS] [unknown] NCC-1664 (unseen, class unknown) [TOS] [unknown] NCC-1697 (unseen, class unknown) [TOS] [unknown] NCC-1718 (unseen, class unknown -- presumed [i]Constitution[/i]) [TOS] [unknown] NCC-1665 (unseen, class unknown) [TOS] [unknown] NCC-1700 (unseen, almost certainly [i]Constitution[/i]-class lead ship, but not canonically referred to as such) [TOS] [i]Republic[/i] NCC-1371 (unseen, class unknown) [TOS] [i]Archon[/i] (unseen, unknown registry and class) [TOS] [i]Valiant[/i] (unseen, unknown registry and class) [TOS] [i]Constellation[/i] NCC-1017 (class unknown, similar to [i]Constitution[/i]) [TOS] [i]Dierdre[/i] (unseen, unknown registry and class) [TOS] [i]Carolina[/i] (unseen, unknown registry and class) [TOS] [i]Yorktown[/i] (unseen, unknown registry and class) [TOS] [i]Farragut[/i] (unseen, unknown registry and class) [TOS] [i]Horizon[/i] (unseen, unknown registry and class) [TOS] [i]Exeter[/i] (registry unknown, [i]Constitution[/i]-class) [TOS] [i]Lexington[/i] (registry unknown, [i]Constitution[/i]-class) [TOS] [i]Hood[/i] (registry unknown, [i]Constitution[/i]-class) [TOS] [i]Potemkin[/i] (registry unknown, [i]Constitution[/i]-class) [TOS] [i]Excalibur[/i] (registry unknown, [i]Constitution[/i]-class) [TOS] [i]Beagle[/i] (unseen, unknown registry and class) [TOS] [i]Defiant[/i] NCC-1764* ([i]Constitution[/i]-class) [TOS] [i]Aurora[/i] (unknown registry and class) [TOS] [i]Revere[/i] NCC-595 (unseen, class unknown, Scout type vessel**) [TMP] [i]Columbia[/i] NCC-621 (unseen, class unknown, Scout type vessel**) [TMP] [i]Entente[/i] NCC-2120 (unseen, class unknown, Dreadnought type vessel) [TMP] [i]Merrimac[/i] NCC-1715 (unseen, class unknown -- presumed [i]Constitution[/i], Cruiser type vessel) [TMP] [i]Enterprise[/i] NCC-1701 ([i]Enterprise[/i]-class) [TMP/TWOK/TSFS] [i]Reliant[/i] NCC-1864 (class unknown at the time) [TWOK] [i]Kobayashi Maru[/i] (unseen, unknown registry and class) [TWOK] [i]Excelsior[/i] NX-2000 ([i]Excelsior[/i]-class) [TSFS] [i]Grissom[/i] NCC-638 (class unknown at the time, Scout type vessel**) [TSFS] * Registry suggested in internal memo, not seen in episode, no data to refute validity. ** Type designation incompatible with 'NCC' prefix. Solutions vary. These are the only canon data points we have to go on for the TOS and early movie era. Any attempts to match up orphaned registries with other ships, seen or unseen, is problematic at best. I know there are a lot of problems with fandom, as well, but there are a few worthy sources out there that build on official (or at least [i]formerly[/i] official) publications -- namely the offerings from Franz Joseph and FASA. All of those sources use flawed understandings of the TOS registry scheme, and so their conclusions all require modification to bring them in line. I will present my [i]Constitution[/i] class reconstruction in my next post. --Jonah [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3