Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Starfleet refits and registries
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Wraith: [QB] ^ Yeah good point. Perhaps the NCC-1017 was modified to demonstrate the technology that would be installed on the connie and the general configuration. As for the block system of designating minor starship warients, this is something I like (tho' Ritten was wrong about the letter being the block designator on US aircraft. There's actually another number, going up in 10s after it eg. F-16D-30). The letter indicates a more comprehensive varient) The original Excelcior could have a 'full' designation of; Excelcior-NCC-2000-10 in it's final operational configuration. Refits would just have the block number updated and not the class name. "I remain firm in my belief that individual ships do not change class, no matter how drastically they are refitted." I agree here, the Constellation would not necessarily be a Connie, I am merely attempting to explain why it looks so similar. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3