Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Shelley class Starship
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Reverend: [QB] [QUOTE] This depends on whether or not you think the attack fighter really is 30m long. ditl.org places it at 14m instead, and if you examine the cockpit at that size it's comparable with the TNG shuttlepod set - and from "The Maquis" we know that the cockpit is about that big. Enterprise-D shuttlebay with overlays I've placed a 23m runabout, and a 14m and 30m fighter in there. Make of it what you will [/QUOTE]Indeed, I was going by Bernd's assesment of the fighter and he's usually right about this sort of thing. Even so, you can see that it'd still be a squeeze to store and maintain a full squadron of 14m long fighters on a standard Galaxy-Class. [QUOTE] The Intrepid and Constitution kitbash is a monster, and if it exists, it ought to be either a testbed or perhaps another "flying bomb" that can barely move at warp.[/QUOTE]I think that this one is just a poor rendition of the Proto-Voyager study model. Perhaps this is a Bradbury-Class ship? [QUOTE] The tug is of Klingon origin. Starfleet doesn't believe in tools that look like Darth Vader's torture droid or Edward Scissorhands. Their tugs may be utilitarian, but the manipulators and whatnot on those tugs will be aesthetically pleasing and devoid of sharp hooklike things. [/QUOTE]I'm pretty sure this thing sported a starfleet delta. I don't have a problem with this since its a purely industrial ship and that asthetics would be a very low priority when weighed with practicalities. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3