Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
It *is* NCC-2010-5
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim: [QB] Couple of things, Captain: While it's clear that the executive shuttle and the full-sized [i]Sydney[/i] are not the same vessel type, according to all backstage sources (Okuda in the Encyclopedia, Sternbach in ST: The Magazine, and the Continuing Mission) it was the TUC shuttle that was modified by Greg Jein into the [i]Jenolan[/i] for "Relics" (TNG). I'm not sure just what the deal was with the shuttles in GEN. Maybe there was a duplicate model of the same shuttle, or something. The NCC-K7 shuttle was from "Trials and Tribble-ations" (DS9), not from TAS. I don't know [i]what[/i] Greg Jein was trying to say with this labeling, but I'm somewhat reluctant to allow that space stations are assigned NCC registries. (Although, it probably wouldn't be that much of a strain to the registry system we've seen if they were.) The hyphenated character in the [i]Nash[/i]'s registry is clearly a 5, and can in no way be mistaken for an "S." :rolleyes: I prefer not to speculate on this issue, but I will say that I do not believe the [i]Nash[/i] to be in any way "different" from other [i]Sydney[/i]s simply because it was seen flying upside-down, and I do not believe that it is supposed to be its own class, and I do not believe that the [i]Sydney[/i] is in some way not a "true" ship class and is instead some kind of uber-shuttlecraft. Beyond that, I don't know [i]what[/i] to believe. -[b]MMoM[/b] :D [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3