Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Oh God, not the Yeager again.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by PsyLiam: [qb]Wondering out loud, do we know that the NCC-1701 was the first ship to be refit to look like that? Is there anything to say that there weren't Connies built in, say, 2270 that looked like that?[/qb][/QUOTE]The answer is, most pointedly, [b]no[/b]. Take a drink every time someone uses the term "sub-class." :rolleyes: I'm inclined to call the [i]Yeager[/i] an Intrepid-class variant for the same reason I'm inclined to call the [i]Centaur[/i] an Excelsior-class variant: It's the only "official" designation it's ever been given. (That is, of course, providing that "Yeager-class" is a fan-originated term, as [b]Sol System[/b] said.) Of course, that designation does screw a lot with the [i]Intrepid[/i] being NCC-74600. Oh, well... -[b]MMoM[/b] :D [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3