Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Starfleet refits and registries
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Wraith: [QB] ^ Yeah, that'd be nice (go on, make it NCC-1710, you know you want to...) on to buisiness... Ritten: "I was showing that not only are there blocks, there are also suffixes.... a suffix has no limit on the blocks produced under it...." Sorry I misread :rolleyes: . "So there was a Constitution-class USS Constitution w/ a registry of NCC-1700. Big deal. I'd like to see any real evidence whatsoever that calls this ship the class ship of the Constitution class. I'd also like to see any evidece you have to prove that there was no Constitution-class USS Constitution w/ a registry below NCC-956." So; a ship with registry indicating it was built c.2200 is the class ship. And only 12 of this class were built over the next 50-60 years? I'm not entirely sure that this is any more plausible than the refit idea. I like the constitution family idea... [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3