Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
TOS Ships
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Identity Crisis: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Boris: [qb]Also, strictly canonically, a new class need not start at xx00. It could just as well run from 1754 to 1758.[/qb][/QUOTE]We're not talking about the TNG stuff, or even the movies, just the original scheme of Matt Jeffries. Now show me a canonical instance of a TOS class that didn't start off with a ship registry xx00 ? Jonah is suggesting that Starfleet changed away from this scheme to a more linear scheme at some point. Just as Trek changed from Matt Jeffries' scheme to Mike Okuda's scheme. [QUOTE][qb]The blue sensor couldn't reveal that it was the Constellation. It probably did reveal that the ship is visually identical to the Enterprise.[/qb][/QUOTE]But the Constellation is NOT visually identical to the Enterprise. They used an inaccurate model kit with several noticable differences. So it's much harder to decide whether the Constellation was a Constitution with yard differences or a member of another class within the starship type. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3