Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
On screen ships
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bernd: [QB] Timo: I guess you are right and you have just solved one of the greatest mysteries in the universe [IMG]http://flare.solareclipse.net/smile.gif[/IMG] I also see the two tiny nacelles. The explanation is also reasonable in that the pod is hardly taller than the saucer, so it can't be the studio model (apart from being too small). The only model of this size that did exist is probably the one from "Future Imperfect", and why change it too much? Seven variants! I have had only five so far, since I didn't count the CGI. The question is how many different variants of the Nebula exist as real starships. I think there are three or four: 1. The Phoenix with the round pod. The pod is probably detachable and the rest may be identical to other Nebula class ships. Still, it might be a different modular concept considering that also the support pylons of the Phoenix are completely different than the single pylon of the Sutherland. 2. The Sutherland. 3. The Farragut. Some detail changes here, for instance, the RCS thrusters. Might be a different (older) production batch. (4. The "Future Imperfect" Nebula. The whole situation was only an illusion created by an alien. However, there is no reason to create a non-existing ship and risk that Riker detects that he is being deceived. On the other hand, who prevents 24th century model builders from kitbashing? They might find it equally cool as some individuals today.) [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3