Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Nemesis Warbird (Massive Spoilers!)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Sol System: [QB] At the risk of being rude, your personal aesthetic choices do not instantly become universal design rules when you put them on the internet. Lots of people happen to not like many of these "canonical" 24th century ships. (Also, the Lakul? Uh, a ship that was being used 60 years before TNG doesn't look TNG enough? I am confused?) And many people happen to like many of the ships listed as being bad and evil and wrong. Some of you do not like certain designs. Wow! An amazing revelation! And I am glad of it. This would be a very tedious place if we all liked the same things when it came to starships. But just because you don't like it doesn't make it a rule. Not by a longshot. Now, as regards the "they wouldn't like it at Farpoint" argument, this I do not understand. When the Romulan warbird showed up we had seen a great whopping two Romulan ships. The warbird looks almost entirely unlike either of them. We know for a fact that Romulan ships are white with a hawk painted on the bottom, for one thing. Where is the continuity? Obviously, Probert is a hack who cares nothing for his work. Frankly, I'm not bowled over by this new ship either. Mostly because I can only see about a third of the thing from that poorly lit picture. But I am under no illusion that my personal taste is somehow The One True Way. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3