May I add a suggestion? How about we calm down a bit with SWDAO labels in topics You are never going to find everyone agreeing on a given topic, so every topic could technically be labeled SWDAO. I thought it was only supposed to mean questions which create 50-message threads per second, not topics which haven't been discussed before or can be pretty much resolved after some discussion.
Boris
------------------
Posted by Bernd (Member # 6) on :
I suggest to restrict the SWDAO labels to the topics that have been listed in Frank's SWDAO threads, maybe including other issues that have been discussed before (because there's one I would like to add: the Dauntless --> new SWDAO thread necessary in my opinion).
------------------ "No, thanks. I've had enough. One more cup and I'll jump to warp." (Janeway, asked if she would like some coffee in "Once upon a Time") www.uni-siegen.de/~ihe/bs/startrek/
Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
Next thread: SWDAO: Limiting SWDAO threads or not?
------------------ "... Then you'll see me do some MAJOR dancing on your face!" -- Cosby
Posted by The First One (Member # 35) on :
Or. . . SWDAO: Finding better Acronyms than SWDAO
Posted by steamrunner2000 on :
It about time!!
------------------ Has anyone seen any swallows around???
Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
Boris is mostly correct...let's cover the current topics first. Here are the remaining ones:
- Melbourne registry - Curry/Shelley registry - Shenandoah registry - Zhukov registry - Mekong registry - Farragut registry - Fearless registry - Ganda/er spelling - Br*ttain spelling - Jenol*n spelling - Cochrane: registry/appearances - Trieste: original class - Studio models (Leeds/Trinculo/Valkyrie) - Admiral Hanson's ship/ships - Intrepid commissioning date - Low registry ships (Akiras, Phoenix, etc.) - Phantom Oberth Grissom - Centaur: kitbash or class? - Challenger design: very old or relatively new? - Princeton registry: 59804 or 58904? - Data's scout: no name?
[This message was edited by The Shadow on June 17, 1999.]
Posted by USS Vanguard (Member # 130) on :
If someone just did a SWDAO: Registries, then that would cut down the SWDAO topics to a bare minimum.
------------------ -I'm not principal of the line, mother. -And you never will be...
Posted by RW (Member # 27) on :
What the hick does it mean anyway? **** we don't agree on. But what's the S? And don't we always disagree in this forum? Well, you, not we, as I never participate in petty bickering over mislabeled pieces of plastic of course.
Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
Stuff.
And SWDAO is mostly for topics with disagreeing primary evidence (show vs. show, show vs. encyclopedia, show vs. popular consensus, etc.).