This is topic Stop SWDAOing the forums immediately!!! in forum Starships & Technology at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/6/276.html

Posted by Jim Phelps (Member # 102) on :
 
May I add a suggestion? How about we calm down a bit with SWDAO labels in topics You are never going to find everyone agreeing on a given topic, so every topic could technically be labeled SWDAO. I thought it was only supposed to mean questions which create 50-message threads per second, not topics which haven't been discussed before or can be pretty much resolved after some discussion.

Boris

------------------


 


Posted by Bernd (Member # 6) on :
 
I suggest to restrict the SWDAO labels to the topics that have been listed in Frank's SWDAO threads, maybe including other issues that have been discussed before (because there's one I would like to add: the Dauntless --> new SWDAO thread necessary in my opinion).

------------------
"No, thanks. I've had enough. One more cup and I'll jump to warp." (Janeway, asked if she would like some coffee in "Once upon a Time")
www.uni-siegen.de/~ihe/bs/startrek/

 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
Next thread:
SWDAO: Limiting SWDAO threads or not?

------------------
"... Then you'll see me do some MAJOR dancing on your face!" -- Cosby

 


Posted by The First One (Member # 35) on :
 
Or. . . SWDAO: Finding better Acronyms than SWDAO
 
Posted by steamrunner2000 on :
 
It about time!!

------------------
Has anyone seen any swallows around???
 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Boris is mostly correct...let's cover the current topics first. Here are the remaining ones:

- Melbourne registry
- Curry/Shelley registry
- Shenandoah registry
- Zhukov registry
- Mekong registry
- Farragut registry
- Fearless registry
- Ganda/er spelling
- Br*ttain spelling
- Jenol*n spelling
- Cochrane: registry/appearances
- Trieste: original class
- Studio models (Leeds/Trinculo/Valkyrie)
- Admiral Hanson's ship/ships
- Intrepid commissioning date
- Low registry ships (Akiras, Phoenix, etc.)
- Phantom Oberth Grissom
- Centaur: kitbash or class?
- Challenger design: very old or relatively new?
- Princeton registry: 59804 or 58904?
- Data's scout: no name?

------------------
http://frankg.dgne.com/
"Speak softly, drive a Sherman tank." - TMBG

[This message was edited by The Shadow on June 17, 1999.]

[This message was edited by The Shadow on June 17, 1999.]
 


Posted by The First One (Member # 35) on :
 
I thought the Yeager and Yellowstone had been done?
 
Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
They have. Fixed. I removed some others, like the Excelsior Farragut, since Siegfried did that one.

------------------
http://frankg.dgne.com/
"Speak softly, drive a Sherman tank." - TMBG

[This message was edited by The Shadow on June 17, 1999.]
 


Posted by USS Vanguard (Member # 130) on :
 
If someone just did a SWDAO: Registries, then that would cut down the SWDAO topics to a bare minimum.

------------------
-I'm not principal of the line, mother.
-And you never will be...
 


Posted by RW (Member # 27) on :
 

What the hick does it mean anyway? **** we don't agree on. But what's the S? And don't we always disagree in this forum? Well, you, not we, as I never participate in petty bickering over mislabeled pieces of plastic of course.
 
Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Stuff.

And SWDAO is mostly for topics with disagreeing primary evidence (show vs. show, show vs. encyclopedia, show vs. popular consensus, etc.).

------------------
http://frankg.dgne.com/
"Speak softly, drive a Sherman tank." - TMBG
 


Posted by RW (Member # 27) on :
 

exqueeze me..
 
Posted by USS Vanguard (Member # 130) on :
 
maybe later...

------------------
-I'm not principal of the line, mother.
-And you never will be...
 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3