T O P I C ��� R E V I E W
|
colin
Member # 217
|
posted
A possible chronological chart showing evolution from the Daedalus to the Galaxy Daedalus Class->Constitution Class->Excelsior Class->Ambassador Class->Niagara Class->New Orleans Class->Nebula Class->Galaxy Class [Freedom Class is an offshot of this evolutionary tree]
------------------
takeoffs are optional; landings are mandatory
|
Sol System
Member # 30
|
posted
Hmm. Well, if we go by registries, and make a few big assumptions about certain ships from ST VI, a roughly chronological list of ship classes would go...Daedalus Oberth Constitution Miranda Soyuz Constellation Excelsior Sydney Korolev (One of those ST VI assumptions.) Challenger (Another one...I think. Or maybe I've lost my mind) Federation (Ooh, a TMP+Fandom one!) Antares Ambassador Apollo Hokule'a Wambundu Niagara Surak Istanbul Merced Mediterranean Renaissance Steamrunner Springfield Yorkshire Olympic New Orleans Chimera Prometheus Nebula Zodiac Saber Rigel Akira Norway Freedom Andromeda Galaxy Cheyenne Danube Bradbury Nova Defiant Intrepid Keep in mind that I make no claims as to the factual nature of this list. It's simply organized along the basis of earliest registry number per class. But it can provide an interesting foundation for further, uh...research. Yeah, that's it. ------------------ "Recombination, then Viacom; Safeway." -- Soul Coughing
|
The First One
Member # 35
|
posted
Actually, you're going at cross-purposes. Trinky-Winky's proposing an evolutionary tree, which can only be doomed to failure - after all, we don't know how many other classes there might be involved, ones we've never seen or never heard of. And I don't think the Niagara should be in there. It seems to be an Ambasssador variant, with little contributing towards the Nebula.And a list of classes in chronological order is meaningless too. After all, we still don't know what registries represent, and several ship classes are probably being developed simultaneously.
|
Bernd
Member # 6
|
posted
A chronological order is a starting point, but is probably not sufficient. I think a tree should be created, based on the distinct "design families" like Constitution-Miranda-Constellation and Galaxy-Nebula. Secondly, the ships should be grouped by age (Constitution prior to Miranda), as far as it is known. Thirdly, connections could be made between ships of different ages, but similar purposes (e.g. Daedalus --> Constitution). Finally, it could be speculated how one ship design could have influenced another one that has nothing in common but certan design features (e.g. New Orleans saucer shape --> Galaxy).I remember there was such a tree at Utopia Planitia, but with several branches I couldn't agree with. Someone still have it? ------------------ *Obscure humorous pretentious Gaelic-Latin signature* Ex Asterige Scientia [This message has been edited by Bernd (edited September 16, 1999).]
|
The First One
Member # 35
|
posted
Yes, there was. It could probably do with updating. I don't think I have it anymore, but someone will.
|
Fabrux
Member # 71
|
posted
A tree can be found at the Daystrom Institute Technical Library ------------------ All hands, brace for impact! WHAM!!
|
|