This is topic On screen ships in forum Starships & Technology at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/6/491.html

Posted by deadcujo (Member # 13) on :
 
I'm trying to think of each class of Starfleet ship
that has been seen on screen. This is all I've got:
Akira
Ambassador
Centaur
Challenger
Cheyenne
Constellation
Constitution
Constitution refit
Daedalus
Danube
Dauntless
Defiant
Excelsior
Freedom
Galaxy
Galaxy future refit
Intrepid
Miranda
Nebula
New Orleans
Norway
Noble
Oberth
Olympic
Peregrine
Prometheus
Rigel
Saber
Shelley
Sovereign
Soyuz
Steamrunner
Sydney
Yeager
Yellowstone

And whatever classes the Relativity and Raven were...

------------------
The Unknown Vulcan
http://www.phix-it.com/~perseus/



 


Posted by Baloo (Member # 5) on :
 
Has the Daedalus ever been seen onscreen except as a model on someone's desk?

--Baloo

------------------
Jesus saves.
Moses invests.
--Bumper Sticker
www.geocities.com/Area51/Shire/8641/



 


Posted by deadcujo (Member # 13) on :
 
I'm pretty sure I seen it in a TNG episode.

------------------
The Unknown Vulcan
http://www.phix-it.com/~perseus/



 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Nope, it's just been a model.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"Okay, what's an MSD?" - Rick Sternbach


 


Posted by Michael Dracon (Member # 4) on :
 
You forgot the 2 Miranda class refits.

And it is Nova, not Noble.

------------------
Presenting the NX-59650. It can slice! It can dice! It can seperate into THREE parts!!
Now available with THREE FULL warpcores!
But wait! Buy now, and get a free number upgrade to NX-74913!

To order, call: 0800-PROMETHEUS

 


Posted by Hobbes (Member # 138) on :
 
Would seeing the model count? Say we see a model of a Wambundu-class ship on a crewman's desk and the crewman points out, or there's a small plaque on the model saying USS Drake NCC-20381 Wambundu-class. This would suggest to be the design of the ship and would therefore be considered as how the Wambundu-class looks like even though we haven't seen it in space.

------------------
7 of 9 alarm clock: "Wake up. Resistance is futile."
Dilbert: "I wonder if I could ever date a woman like Jeri Ryan."
7 of 9 alarm clock: "That too is futile."
Federation Starship Datalink - Now with a pop-up on every page...damn you Tripod!
 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
I take it the Freedom class was seen as a wrecked heap in one of the graveyard scenes. Is it the Constitution with 3 nacelles? If it is, please see my thread about kitbashes.

Also, supposedly, the relativity is (or will be) a Wells Class vessel.

Don't forget the Scoutship from First Contact.

------------------
"Resolve and thou art free."
 


Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :
 
Oh, yeah, and you forgot the Curry!!!

"lies on floor, stomping" Bwahahahahaa!!!!

------------------
-You're crazy!!!
-Funny, I thought I was pisces!
 


Posted by The First One (Member # 35) on :
 
The Freedom's the single nacelle and saucer, I think. I'm about to re-draw it for UP3. . .
 
Posted by Justin_Timberland (Member # 236) on :
 
What episode featured the USS Drake model? I must have missed that.

------------------
"Women feel the emotions of happiness, hatred, anger, helplessness, and desire.

Men on the other hand feel the guy version, Horny."

-Michael_T


 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
That was just an example.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"Okay, what's an MSD?" - Rick Sternbach


 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
The Curry-type is on there, he just has it listed as the "Shelley".

And, according to Frank, one of the obscure classes (Deneva, was it?) was seen for an instant as it exploded in "Legacy".

------------------
"Agh! Save me from the wee turtles!"
-Groundskeeper Willy, The Simpsons
 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Elim confirmed that, too.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"Okay, what's an MSD?" - Rick Sternbach


 


Posted by Elim Garak (Member # 14) on :
 
Yes, but it's impossible to discern what exactly it looks like; it is a ship, however.

------------------
Elim Garak: "Oh, it's just Garak. Plain, simple Garak. Now, good day to you, Doctor. I'm so glad to have made such an... interesting new friend today." (DS9: "Past Prologue")
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Modified "Merchantman", wasn't it?

------------------
"Stirs a large iron pot. Casting a spell on Vermont."
--
John Linnell

 


Posted by Masao (Member # 232) on :
 
If you are going to count ships appearing only as models, what about ships appearing only as schematics? During the Kobayashi Maru exercise in STII, schematics of several Constiution-class derivatives, including a one-nacelle scout or destroyer and a 2-nacelle tug, from the "Starfleet Technical Manual" were visible on bridge monitors. Are these also canon?

------------------
When you're in the Sol system, come visit the Starfleet Museum



 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Well, to be perfectly strict, this statement is canon: At the time of ST2, there were diagrams of those ships in the computer of the KM simulator. Now, from this, it could certainly be inferred that these ships are SF ships. In fact, I'd be very interested to know which ones they are. However, there are also people who would say the ships aren't necessarily in SF service, and that would be perfectly valid, too.

------------------
Rimmer: "Holly, put a trace on Paranoia."
Holly: "What's a trace?"
Rimmer: "It's space jargon. It means 'find him'."
Holly: "No it doesn't. You just made it up to sound cool."
-Red Dwarf: "Confidence & Paranoia"
 


Posted by colin (Member # 217) on :
 
In the episode "The Wounded", in Capt Maxwell's ready room, there is a model of a starship. This is not the Nebula Class model. Can someone get a picture of this ship?

If there schematics of the ships from the Star Fleet Technical Manuel,then this raises a question. Did the producers and directors of Star Trek 1 and 2 view the manuel as being "canonical"? And what about the USS Antares? Two items of notice-the USS Antares shares a registry with a ship of the Scout Class (Hermes) and is identified as SS Antares in the official synopsis to "Charlie X". This would change the status of the ship to a civilian ship and not the class ship of the Antares Class. In summation, this complicates the issue of the Star Fleet Technical Manuel and the USS Antares. According to Paramount, whatever is seen or heard on the episodes and films is canonical, so if the ships from the SFTM are in a film, this makes them canonical and this makes the SFTM canonical. What a fuckin mess. Jeez.

------------------

takeoffs are optional; landings are mandatory
 


Posted by Vacuum robot lady from Spaceballs (Member # 239) on :
 
Hey, Hey there. Watch the language.

If the Designs from the Technical manual are in the Movies, then the designs themselves, and only the designs are canon. None of the names of whatnot.

I'm not really understanding your whole rant about the Antares. If you are comparing the name to any names in the Technical Manual, it is irrelevant. The names in those books are not canon, so you don't have to worry. And what synopsis are you talking about? One from startrek.com? Anything on that should be taken with a grain of salt. Or a whole silo. Remember the whole USS Antares NCC-47404?, Borg Killer at Wolf 424? Or the USS Trail?

------------------
"I've never seen anything this beautiful in the entire galaxy. Alright, give me the bomb" -Ultra Magnus, Fight or Flee


 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Colin: I think it's just a model of the Phoenix:

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"We've got some new songs here that are not even on the MP3 thing. They're not available in any format, except of course the bootlegs that seem to proliferate all through our audience, as we watch people lip-synch along to songs that HAVEN'T BEEN RELEASED! DAMN YOU!" - John Linnell

[This message has been edited by The Shadow (edited November 08, 1999).]
 


Posted by Masao (Member # 232) on :
 
The way I see it, only the ship designs are canon. We can assume that they represent ships in Starfleet service, but their actual names, numbers, duration of service, etc, can only be conjecture. The rest of the SFTM cannot be considered canon. We cannot even assume that the two ships mentioned in radio chatter at the start of ST:TMP are actually the same ships shown in the SFTM. However, they might be.

A week or two ago, someone posted information about the technical manual (http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Stargate/9081/rememberfj.html). This site tells all about the manual and its use in the movies. Highly recommended.

------------------
When you're in the Sol system, come visit the Starfleet Museum



 


Posted by Vacuum robot lady from Spaceballs (Member # 239) on :
 
Is there an echo?
Really, though, the designs and only the designs are canon. Simple as that.

------------------
"I've never seen anything this beautiful in the entire galaxy. Alright, give me the bomb" -Ultra Magnus, Fight or Flee


 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Which designs were they, specifically?

------------------
Rimmer: "Holly, put a trace on Paranoia."
Holly: "What's a trace?"
Rimmer: "It's space jargon. It means 'find him'."
Holly: "No it doesn't. You just made it up to sound cool."
-Red Dwarf: "Confidence & Paranoia"
 


Posted by Masao (Member # 232) on :
 
I don't have the technical manual with me here at work so I can't give you the class names (which are not visible on screen anyway), but cropped but otherwise unaltered pages of the technical manual were used which show a 1-nacelle scout or destroyer and a 2-nacelle tug, both based on the Constitution. I believe the tug is the Ptolomey class and the scout or destroyer classes were Hermes or Cygnus. At the beginning of ST:TMP, you can hear the following names and registries on voice over: Revere NCC-595 and USS Columbia NCC-621. Both names and registries can be found in the technical manual.

------------------
When you're in the Sol system, come visit the Starfleet Museum



 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Colin and The Shadow:

I think the model on Maxwell's desk is the original study model for USS Melbourne, as seen in "Future Imperfect". In that episode, this model (which has an elongated secondary hull compared to the real Nebula class) had two miniature warp nacelles in place of the dorsal module. These nacelles had red ramscoops and blue field windows, as all proper nacelles ought to have.

In "The Wounded", the real Nebula debuted for the first time, as a full-scale photographic model that was way bigger than the desktop study model. Obviously, this big model could not be used as desktop decoration, so the prop people chose the next best alternative: they slightly modified the old Melbourne model by painting the miniature nacelles white and connecting them with a piece of plastic so that the model *superficially* looks like the Phoenix.

If one looks closely, one can see the painted-over and connected nacelles of the desktop model do not quite match the wider and more graceful arch used as the module of the Phoenix. The too long secondary hull isn't evident from these photos, though.

The desktop model received a second "refit" when it was added to the desktop collection of Capt. Sisko. The ersatz module was replaced by a proper Nebula triangular model, but the secondary hull still sticks out.

So if we argue that models are canon, then we have proof for at least seven Nebula variants!

-Melbourne as seen in "Future Imperfect"
-Phoenix as filmed
-Phoenix as desktop model
-modern Nebula as filmed before Generations
-modern Nebula as filmed in Generations
-modern Nebula as seen in CGI in DS9
-modern Nebula as seen on Sisko's desktop

Three of these share the elongated secondary hull, so perhaps that config ought to become canon?

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Oh, and BTW, Frank... Any more of those screencaps of obscure models and ships? My heart always misses two-three beats when something like the above picture appears out of nowhere. Would you happen to have other pics archived somewhere deep in the bowels of your netsite, or something...?

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Most images I have are on either my SFSD site or SWDAO. Here's the Nebula model from "Future Imperfect," though:

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"We've got some new songs here that are not even on the MP3 thing. They're not available in any format, except of course the bootlegs that seem to proliferate all through our audience, as we watch people lip-synch along to songs that HAVEN'T BEEN RELEASED! DAMN YOU!" - John Linnell
 


Posted by Masao (Member # 232) on :
 
As long as we're talking about obscure models, does anyone have any information on the Enterprise refit variant in that episode with the holodeck simulation of Leah Brahms? I seem to remember that in the drafing room at Utopia Planitia you can see an AMT/Ertl model of the refit Enterprise (missing the primary hull rim window pieces) with Constellation-style warp nacelles. Did I really see this or is was it a side effect of my youthful experimentation with mind-altering substances?

By the way, the 1-nacelle Constitution variants in the SFTM are called Saladin (not Cyngus) and Hermes.

------------------
When you're in the Sol system, come visit the Starfleet Museum



 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
Masao! You took the words err type out from under my fingers

No, your not delusional, I mentioned it here a LONG time ago - its probably been forgotten... maybe if we ask Mr G. nicely he'd do a nice big screen capture of it.

The nacelles were also attaced differently - on the side like a Constellation class.

According to Mike Okuda - they dropped the E refit model and stuck it back together wrong... but how could they do that!?!

The saucer also had a thick ring around it - like an enlarged sensor rim - like on the ED... (from where they glued it back together I guess)

I wondered what it was doing in the drafting room... I suggested it might have been a ship that had a lot of subsystems of the ED - i.e. a testbed ship - like the Pegasus.

------------------
"Remove your hand or I will remove your arm!" - 7 of 9
 


Posted by The359 (Member # 37) on :
 
Wait, wasn't the Pegasus originally a 4 nacelled ship as well?

hmm...

------------------
"The things hollow--it goes on forever--and--oh my God!--it's full of stars!" -David Bowman's last transmission back to Earth, 2001: A Space Odyssey

[This message has been edited by The359 (edited November 09, 1999).]
 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
I don't know?? was it? - was that going to be the 'new' ship they were going to make? wasn't it going to be from the EC era!?!

(I just added the Pegasus info - from what Admiral Millenium guy said)

Also, weren't they going to show an E nil era ship in "Cause and Effect" but again ran out of money!?!

------------------
"Remove your hand or I will remove your arm!" - 7 of 9
 


Posted by Masao (Member # 232) on :
 
Well, in fact I am delusional, but apparently not about this particular ship model.

Yes, I was also wondering if this ship might be a test bed: but for what? Was this drafting room only for propulsion systems or was it a more general drafting room? If it does not represent a test bed, could it just be a famous ship or one on which someone working at UP had served? Also, I wonder if Constellation style engines were refitted to all surviving Constitution refits or if this was a special case. (This assumes that Constellation-type engines were developed after the Constitution refit engines.)


Yes a screen cap would be most desirable!

------------------
When you're in the Sol system, come visit the Starfleet Museum



 


Posted by Masao (Member # 232) on :
 
I don't know if the Miranda/Soyuz in C+E was to be a Constitution refit, but I had heard that in some other show Geordi actually says "Constitution" but his line was later redubbed to say "Constellation" because they sound similar. I guess the ST:TMP Enterprise model is too heavy to work with or too expensive to refurbish.

------------------
When you're in the Sol system, come visit the Starfleet Museum



 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
I don't have "Booby Trap" on tape.

The Pegasus was originally supposed to be a four-nacelled Cheyenne-like ship.

The Constitution/Constellation redub was in "The Battle."

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"We've got some new songs here that are not even on the MP3 thing. They're not available in any format, except of course the bootlegs that seem to proliferate all through our audience, as we watch people lip-synch along to songs that HAVEN'T BEEN RELEASED! DAMN YOU!" - John Linnell
 


Posted by Lt. Tom on :
 
On the topic of models, has anyone considered that they might be the same thing in the 24th century that they are in the 20th--that is, artists' renderings? I mean, people create their own 3D meshes today. Who's to say that someone wouldn't want to show off the Nebula variant they just fed through the replicator?
 
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
There is a scene in "The Pegasus" where a display on that ship shows four oblong shaps grouped in pairs. Some people have interpreted this to mean that the Pegasus actually had four nacelles. Personally, I think it's more likely that each pair represents two wspects of one nacelle (upper and lower halves of the warp coils?). Now, as for whether that display was made before or after they switched to the Oberth model, I don't know. It may have originally been meant to represent four nacelles...

------------------
Rimmer: "Holly, put a trace on Paranoia."
Holly: "What's a trace?"
Rimmer: "It's space jargon. It means 'find him'."
Holly: "No it doesn't. You just made it up to sound cool."
-Red Dwarf: "Confidence & Paranoia"
 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
If the information we have is true, then, yes, it was.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"We've got some new songs here that are not even on the MP3 thing. They're not available in any format, except of course the bootlegs that seem to proliferate all through our audience, as we watch people lip-synch along to songs that HAVEN'T BEEN RELEASED! DAMN YOU!" - John Linnell
 


Posted by Masao (Member # 232) on :
 
I read somewhere that a Ambassador-era scout-type ship was designed as Pegasus but the model was never built. Instead, they went back to Oberth. Maybe this design got as far as an onscreen Okudagram, as mentioned by TSN, but the visual effects with Oberth were added later.

I've only seen part of "The Pegasus" (believe it or not, the cable transmission was knocked out by a typhoon), but I don't remember seeing any schematic. Does this ship look like something from the Ambassador era?

------------------
When you're in the Sol system, come visit the Starfleet Museum



 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
It was just the nacelles, actually. http://frankg.dgne.com/utopics/pegasus.jpg

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"We've got some new songs here that are not even on the MP3 thing. They're not available in any format, except of course the bootlegs that seem to proliferate all through our audience, as we watch people lip-synch along to songs that HAVEN'T BEEN RELEASED! DAMN YOU!" - John Linnell
 


Posted by Mikey T (Member # 144) on :
 
Frank, by any chance do you have a close up of that console?

------------------
"All you people, can't you see, can't you see
How your love's affecting our reality
Everytime we're down
You can make it right
And that makes you larger than life"

-Backstreet Boys



 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Nope; that's as close as it was shown.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"We've got some new songs here that are not even on the MP3 thing. They're not available in any format, except of course the bootlegs that seem to proliferate all through our audience, as we watch people lip-synch along to songs that HAVEN'T BEEN RELEASED! DAMN YOU!" - John Linnell
 


Posted by Bernd (Member # 6) on :
 
Timo: I guess you are right and you have just solved one of the greatest mysteries in the universe I also see the two tiny nacelles. The explanation is also reasonable in that the pod is hardly taller than the saucer, so it can't be the studio model (apart from being too small). The only model of this size that did exist is probably the one from "Future Imperfect", and why change it too much?

Seven variants! I have had only five so far, since I didn't count the CGI. The question is how many different variants of the Nebula exist as real starships. I think there are three or four:

1. The Phoenix with the round pod. The pod is probably detachable and the rest may be identical to other Nebula class ships. Still, it might be a different modular concept considering that also the support pylons of the Phoenix are completely different than the single pylon of the Sutherland.

2. The Sutherland.

3. The Farragut. Some detail changes here, for instance, the RCS thrusters. Might be a different (older) production batch.

(4. The "Future Imperfect" Nebula. The whole situation was only an illusion created by an alien. However, there is no reason to create a non-existing ship and risk that Riker detects that he is being deceived. On the other hand, who prevents 24th century model builders from kitbashing? They might find it equally cool as some individuals today.)

------------------
"When diplomacy fails, there's only one alternative - violence. Force must be applied without apology. It's the Starfleet way."
A somewhat different Janeway in VOY: "Living Witness"
Ex Astris Scientia
 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
1.Frank - can you borrow out "Booby Trap" from the video store

2. Maybe those nacelles are the top and side views!?!

3. I had forgotten how fat Riker got! *grin*

4. Remember Barash in "Future Imperfect" took the "memories" of Riker to create a future... he had Minuet as his mother... now that'd be an interesting concept... The Doctor impregnates someone - and that person can't leave the holodeck

------------------
"Remove your hand or I will remove your arm!" - 7 of 9
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Some further musing about the "Future Imperfect" Nebula model:

The nacelles atop the stern seem identical to Galaxy or Nebula nacelles in shape, despite their smaller size. OTOH, the size seems to come quite close to that used by you and others for the New Orleans nacelles (which are a bit lengthened, though, as you point out).

Now, I keep thinking of those "five-engined" B-747s that ferry spare engines on their port wings. Perhaps this specific Nebula was ferrying these bulky and probably ultra-heavy starship components to a distant yard or a distressed starship? Every good scale model kit of a jet fighter should contain the mundane cargo pods in addition to the more flashy missiles and bombs - so every starship model worth its price ought to have the optional cargo sling as well. And Riker (or the alien kid running the fantasy) might have fancied using this option on his model to make it different from the models found on the desktops of other captains.

The question then becomes, which starship type would this specific cargo be destined for?

And the answer is, of course, Freedom or Niagara. Those could definitely use a canonically confirmed nacelle that's shaped like the Galaxy one, but is smaller to go with the downscaled saucer! Bernd, can you do the honors from that blurry picture (or the better one at Miarecki's home page) to see if they would fit?

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Oh, and by the way... The CGI Nebula definitely ought to be a subclass of its own. There are two significant differences to the Farragut:

-No short phaser strips on aft saucer
-No impulse engines whatsover!

Even the Farragut still had the tiny grilles below the saucer lip to denote impulse engines, IIRC. The CGI doesn't. I'm not sure about the short phaser strips under the secondary hull fantail. They aren't there in the Phoenix or the Sutherland, but the Sutherland does have something that looks like two-sided adhesive tape in this location (according to TNG:The Continuing Mission photographs). The Farragut might have had proper strips fitted, and these could have been copied onto the CGI, or then not.

If the CGI is a distinct design, then there are five "real" Nebulas: Melbourne (as seen in "BoBW II"), Phoenix (as seen flying), Sutherland, Farragut, and the CGI ship. Only one of these is drastically different: the Melbourne has the longer hull. But mercifully, this cannot be seen in "BoBWII". So perhaps the longer hull is a mistake perpetuated by Monogram of the 24th century, and only present in tabletop models!

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Bernd (Member # 6) on :
 
Timo: Nice suggestions about the desktop model. I think this particular Nebula could be ferrying those nacelles indeed.

Another possibility is that the Nebula is used as a testbed for the small nacelles. Maybe this is actually the first Nebula ever built (the USS Nebula NX-60xxx), and unlike the other ships that made it into regular service, it is still in experimental status. It is also possible that the secondary hull was shortened for the subsequent ships, and only the USS Nebula retained the long hull. I know that locomotive prototypes are often used as test vehicles, since the differences to the series models are too many to employ them for daily service (difficulties with maintenance and spare parts).

I should have a better image of the Future Imperfect Nebula somewhere, so I could measure the nacelles. If this model was made from two AMT kits (the big and the small Enterprise-D kit), the scale would be obvious, this case the small nacelles would be 56% the length of the large ones. I will try to draw a 2D sketch.

------------------
"When diplomacy fails, there's only one alternative - violence. Force must be applied without apology. It's the Starfleet way."
A somewhat different Janeway in VOY: "Living Witness"
Ex Astris Scientia
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Not to try to hurry you up or anything, but...
http://www.edmiarecki.com/Formatting/p11.html

Unfortunately, the pic also could be used to argue that the ship in question is the Melbourne, not the Nebula - the registry is *almost* visible . Anyway, the top nacelles do seem like 56% versions of the bottom ones, which comes very close to an unstretched variant of the New Orleans nacelles. So those engines would make a Freedom very similar in size to its forebears Hermes and Saladin. Niagara in turn would shrink to Constitution dimensions, provided that the Fact Files image is to be trusted at all.

Dang, I'm getting virtually no work done today

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Dax (Member # 191) on :
 
The blurry name does look like USS Melbourne. Wasn't this design meant to be the Nebula-class study model? Oh, as most of you already know, the USS Melbourne was a Nebula before "Emissary" changed history.

------------------
"Forgive me if I don't share your euphoria!" (Weyoun to Dukat, Tears of the Prophets)
Dax's Ships of STAR TREK
 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
Can ANYONE grab that pic from "Booby Trap"? Or is Frankie-babe our only screen-grabbist around here I must say Frank's grabs are always so crisp and delightful... I'm thinking of getting a vid-cap-card... what is a good one!?! Frank...?

------------------
Ralph: Um, Miss Hoover? There's a dog in the vent.
Hoover: Ralph, remember the time you said Snagglepuss was outside?
Ralph: He was going to the bathroom.
 


Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :
 
What evidence is there that the Melbourne isn't the late Admiral Hansen's Excelsior? Enlighten me.

------------------
-You're crazy!!!
-I thought I was pisces!

 


Posted by Dax (Member # 191) on :
 
1. The ship's rego.
2. That desktop model of the Nebula Melbourne.
3. The destroyed ship in "BoBW II".
4. It's a confirmed fact by Mike Okuda.

They supposedly changed the ship to an Excelsior in "Emissary" simply because they thought it would look better. Just another one of those things...

Anyway Nimrod, I can throw your question right back at you. What is there to prove that the Melbourne was the Admiral's ship?

------------------
"Forgive me if I don't share your euphoria!" (Weyoun to Dukat, Tears of the Prophets)
Dax's Ships of STAR TREK

[This message has been edited by Dax (edited November 13, 1999).]
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Perhaps the Melbourne at Wolf 359 was an Excelsior (as if anyone could tell what that ship in TBoBW was w/o being told, anyway...) and the one seen in the guise of that desktop model was launched later.

------------------
"Alright, so it's impossible. How long will it take?"
-Commander Adams, Forbidden Planet
 


Posted by Dax (Member # 191) on :
 
But they have the same rego.
 
Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
I have an ixTV from ixMicro. The ATI cards are good also.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"We've got some new songs here that are not even on the MP3 thing. They're not available in any format, except of course the bootlegs that seem to proliferate all through our audience, as we watch people lip-synch along to songs that HAVEN'T BEEN RELEASED! DAMN YOU!" - John Linnell
 


Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :
 
Well, Ms. Bouncer, it would be ignorant of the producers of TBoBW to show a ship meeting with the Enterprise, have the admiral refer to a ship to give to Riker, and then hope that the viewers understand for themselves that the one the admiral arrived in was a completely different ship. It would raise questions that would interfer with the pace of the episode.
It's all about making it easy for the viewers to catch on.
And the Excelsior shown in "Emissary" shows that the producers went to great lenghts to eliminate any doubts and explain to us that this ship is the same as the earlier Excelsior. They could've let the Borg destroy it before you could see the registry, but they didn't. You should be thankful that they even bothered to show that they cared about the whole issue.

------------------
-You're crazy!!!
-I thought I was pisces!

 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
The registry in "Emissary" wasn't very legible, at least, not that I've been able to see...

------------------
"Alright, so it's impossible. How long will it take?"
-Commander Adams, Forbidden Planet
 


Posted by Starship Voyager on :
 
Though I've yet to make an actual link to the page, I have uploaded the "Constitution-Class Refit Model" page for those screaming for vidcaps:

http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Zone/6630/picfsentabt.html

I can imagine that this might might be of some interest...

------------------
Phase III: Where No One Has Gone Before...
"A man's reach must exceed his grasp, or what's a heaven for?"
Robert Browning, Andrea del Sarto

 


Posted by The359 (Member # 37) on :
 
Well....it's just a Constitution...

With sideways stuck on sideways...

And large black notches on the saucer...

As for a class? Korolev? Springfield? Doubtful if it's Constitution, right?

------------------
"The things hollow--it goes on forever--and--oh my God!--it's full of stars!" -David Bowman's last transmission back to Earth, 2001: A Space Odyssey


 


Posted by Masao (Member # 232) on :
 
Vidcaps! Vidcaps! Vidcaps!

What the caps don't show clearly are the ends of nacelles. I thought that the nacelles ends were blunt, like Constellation nacelles. Also, the "blotches" are where the windows pieces were left off from this crappy model kit.

However, new engines would not justify a new class designation in the absence of other changes to the hulls. Aircraft get new engines all the time without changing names or numbers: at most a letter is added.

------------------
When you're in the Sol system, come visit the Starfleet Museum



 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Considering that what we were seeing was probably the private office of Leah Brahms... What would be the odds that the low-quality model of the Constitution refit was in fact made by one of Leah's kids, aged 3�
or something? The same would go for the one in "Neutral Zone", with the nacelles glued in backwards. And possibly some other desktop models we see are also hobby projects by the respective kids of the characters - Jake Sisko could have been doing the ships in Sisko's office.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Dax (Member # 191) on :
 
Nimrod: Ms Bouncer??? Your theory is sound but still only a theory. There's nothing canon that proves the Melbourne was the Admiral's ship, whether it's an Excelsior-class or not.

Okuda did confirm that the ship was originally the study Nebula and was later changed to the ILM Excelsior. So really, the ship is either or both, depending on how you want to look at it. The rego wasn't clear (or visible at all) in any of the sightings.

------------------
"Forgive me if I don't share your euphoria!" (Weyoun to Dukat, Tears of the Prophets)
Dax's Ships of STAR TREK

[This message has been edited by Dax (edited November 15, 1999).]
 


Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :
 
Sorry for that. I still like you.

------------------
-You're crazy!!!
-I thought I was pisces!

 


Posted by Dax (Member # 191) on :
 
Apology sincerely accepted, Nimrod. Just don't do it again

I'm in transition between internet providers and have about 10 minutes left of my existing account. I'll see you all again as a new net entity...

------------------
"Forgive me if I don't share your euphoria!" (Weyoun to Dukat, Tears of the Prophets)
Dax's Ships of STAR TREK
 


Posted by Bernd (Member # 6) on :
 
Considering that the window insets are crap and can hardly be handled by children it is a good suggestion that the "Constellationized Constitution" was actually built by children. However, I hope that AMT crap will not exist anymore in the 24th century. As for Jake building starship models, there was actually a short time when he was interested in technical things and worked with O'Brien. Unfortunately he then developed the wrong interests. A hopeless case

------------------
"When diplomacy fails, there's only one alternative - violence. Force must be applied without apology. It's the Starfleet way."
A somewhat different Janeway in VOY: "Living Witness"
Ex Astris Scientia
 


Posted by Bernd (Member # 6) on :
 
Timo: This is exactly the picture I was talking of. It is definitely an AMT 1/1400 model, and the secondary hull is probably adopted without changes, only the neck is removed, as opposed to the custom-built hull of the detailed Nebula studio model. In this case it is obvious that the small nacelles are taken from the 1/2500 model. Actually, this Nebula entirely consists of existing components. Even I had been able to build it.

------------------
"When diplomacy fails, there's only one alternative - violence. Force must be applied without apology. It's the Starfleet way."
A somewhat different Janeway in VOY: "Living Witness"
Ex Astris Scientia
 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3