This is topic Plasma injectors in warp engines... in forum Starships & Technology at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/6/552.html

Posted by TerraZ on :
 
Ok, so by now I must look like a complete Treknology maniac but here I go anyway...

I'm designing a ship for myself (I really can't draw on a computer so unless I scan it you'll probably never see it) and I've been asking myself about what's in those damn engines, plasma injectors in particular. The TNG manual stated that there was a pair of injectors for each warp coil segment but in TNG "Eye of the Beholder" I believe, they only show a single pair at the front of the nacelle. In addition, the Sci-Pub poster of the Ent-nil show a single set of plasma injectors for each nacelle. I know that the show takes precedence, but is there anything I've forgotten? What should I do?

------------------
-If you ask me, I think continuity is highly overrated...
*Brannon Braga*

-Where were you when the brains were handed out?
*Sonic the Hedgehog*
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Do you think we would have let you in here if you weren't a Treknology maniac? :-)

Anyway, that's an interesting question. "Eye of the Beholder" does seem to suggest that there's just a single injection system in the front of each nacelle. However, we really can't see much of what's going on back in the rest of the nacelle. It's possible that there are injectors set between each set of segments, and they were just hidden from view.

I think this is one of those cases where it's impossible to say definitively what's going on. If you want to believe the TM, go ahead. If you want to believe that "Eye of the Beholder" refutes the TM, that's fine, too. No-one can really prove anything one way or the other.

------------------
"...more people buy Harry Potter novels than the works of Alexander Pope, but that's no measure of their quality."
-Tom Aylward-Nally, December 29, 1999
 


Posted by Davok (Member # 143) on :
 
Sorry, but I looked it up in the TM and it says (not literally, I've got the German version) "there is one injector for each warp field coil". I think that's what we saw in EOTB. And the glimpse we got from the interior of the nacelle corresponds perfectly with the schematic in the TM. So where's the problem?

------------------
USS Allegiance LCARS Database


 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
I think the problem is in the definition of "coil". Is a coil the entire engine in one nacelle? Is a coil one segment of the engine? Or is a coil one vertical pair of segments?

------------------
"...more people buy Harry Potter novels than the works of Alexander Pope, but that's no measure of their quality."
-Tom Aylward-Nally, December 29, 1999
 


Posted by TerraZ on :
 
Well, I just checked the picture in the Encyclopedia and we can cleary see that the injector are really close together. The only thing inside the rest of the nacelle (except for the coils) is a conduit of some kind running the entire length of the engine starting from the bottom of the injector. If there are other injectors, they are between the coils and really far apart, so much we can't see them. But I've already made up my mind, I'll go with the Tech Manual. Thanks

------------------
-If you ask me, I think continuity is highly overrated...
*Brannon Braga*

-Where were you when the brains were handed out?
*Sonic the Hedgehog*
 


Posted by Davok (Member # 143) on :
 
Okay, there is one thing I still didn't get: How many plasma injectors are there? One per nacelle or one per coil segment (that would make 18 injectors per nacelle)?

------------------
USS Allegiance LCARS Database


 


Posted by TerraZ on :
 
That's what I'm trying to find out. The show had one pair of injectors for each nacelle. The Tech Manual says a pair for each coil pair, so 18 per nacelle. Thus the dilemma.

------------------
-If you ask me, I think continuity is highly overrated...
*Brannon Braga*

-Where were you when the brains were handed out?
*Sonic the Hedgehog*
 


Posted by Obese Penguin (Member # 271) on :
 
Well according to one of my favortie trek tech sites Daystorm Institute Technical Library
http://www.adeadend.tripod.com

there is only one plasma injector per naccele he also has a pic to back it up .

Also i believe that the tech manuals arnt canon so im going with what ive seen on the show.

------------------
"I am First Omet'iklan, and I am dead. As of this moment, we are all dead. We go into battle to reclaim our lives. This we do gladly, for we are Jem'Hadar. Remember, victory is life."

-- Omet'iklan Ds9:"To the Death"
http://www.geocities.com/travlyn2/index.htm

[This message has been edited by Dhunter (edited January 02, 2000).]
 


Posted by TerraZ on :
 
Well, until now, I've always believed the Tech manual's explaination of how a warp field is created but that would appear to contradict that picture.

Originally, I always assumed the warp field was created by the plasma injectors of each coil segment opening one after the other along the axis of the nacelle. The converging plasma stream would collide in the exact middle of each coil and SOMEHOW it would energize the coils. This would then create a peristaltic(?) force along the warp field. Well, that's how I used to understand it.

If we accept the picture, it means there's a single pair of injector per nacelle. Since we lack any canon info on this, we have to theorize. I propose that each injector pair is continusly open; it is the plasma pulse from the warp core which, while passing between the coils along the nacelle, somehow energize them.

I read 2 years ago an interesting theory dealing with the creation of a "Tensor string" with the plasma or something within the nacelle but I don't remember any of the details. Has anyone read it too?

------------------
-If you ask me, I think continuity is highly overrated...
*Brannon Braga*

-Where were you when the brains were handed out?
*Sonic the Hedgehog*
 


Posted by Davok (Member # 143) on :
 
Do you mean Subspace physics by Jason Hinson? I've read it. But I don't think it says anything about the number of injectos. Personally, I think that there is one injector per coil, and they switched off all but one in "Eye of the Beholder" when this guy tried to jump into the nacelle to committ suicide. I still remember he somehow prevented Data from deactivating the plasma injector, but maybe only the one next to the control room. That would explain the picture, wouldn't it?

------------------
USS Allegiance LCARS Database


 


Posted by TerraZ on :
 
Well, there's another picture with a full view of the interior of the nacelle from the control room and we only see one pair of injectors...

Ok, let's summarize! Canon says there's one pair in each, the Tech Manual says there's one pair per coil segment. Since the Tech Manual was the first Trek book I ever got and I always considered it better than some of the Tech shown on screen (especially in VOY), I'll go with it. Case closed (for me at least)!

------------------
-If you ask me, I think continuity is highly overrated...
*Brannon Braga*

-Where were you when the brains were handed out?
*Sonic the Hedgehog*
 


Posted by Obese Penguin (Member # 271) on :
 
I was poking around Ex Astris Scientia today and found this Picture its to big to paste here so im going to post it as a link .
http://www.uni-siegen.de/~ihe/bs/startrek/scans/galaxy-nacelle.jpg

The diagram shows a cutaway of a Galaxy Class Naccle , in this Diagram you can see the pair of Plasma Injectors in the rear of the Naccele .

I know you said thge case was closed but i thought i could just shine a little bit more light on the subject.

------------------
"Marge .. Do you have other men in this House ? .. Radioactive men?"
~Homer "The Simpsons"
http://www.geocities.com/travlyn2


 


Posted by TerraZ on :
 
Oh, I didn't meant that it was closed, just that I had pretty much made up my mind. Which your picture pretty much changed. Thanks a lot for ruining my existence DHunter ! Just kidding...

However, now there's something I don't understand. We now that the plasma stream is responsible for the creation of a warp field. But why is the stream heading toward the FRONT of the ship? I don't really know how to say this, but for the ship to move foward, the coils must be energized by the plasma from front to rear to create a peristaltic motion, not the other way around. And what's that big conduit on the bottom of the nacelle? Anyone care to theorize on the subject?

By the way, that picture and the fact that the injectors are in the rear contradicts the Galaxy MSD seen on screen. In it, the plasma conduits from the warp core end up in the front of the pylon and are connected to some kind of big "plasma distribution system" or something. I know MSDs aren't supposed to represent the ship exactly but I consider them canon unless proven otherwise (which in this case it has been).

Plus, how do they send plasma from both the lower and upper injector ? If both are synchronised, there are two possibilities:

-The plasma conduit, once under the nacelle, climbs inside the wall of the engine and upon reaching the middle of the height, it splits in two, one going up to the upper injector and one going down to the lower one. Quite complicated.

Like this:
.................____________
................I.....................I
................I.......__..........I
................I......I....^..Injector
................I..+<...............I..<--..Nacelle Hull
................I..I...I__v..Injector
................I..I____...........I
................I____...I...____I
...........................I
Warp core ______I..<--..Plasma Conduit

-Under the nacelle, the plasma conduit splits in two. One stream goes to the top of the nacelle to the upper injector while the other one's plasma is somehow delayed for a short while (to insure synchronisation with the upper injector) before going straight to the lower injector.

Like this:
.................____________
................I...____...........I
................I..I.......I..........I
................I..I.......^..Injector
................I..I..................I..<--..Nacelle Hull
................I..I.......v..Injector
................I..I____I..........I
................I____...I...____I
...........................I
Warp core ______I..<--..Plasme Conduit

Does it make any sense?
Tell me what you think!

------------------
-If you ask me, I think continuity is highly overrated...
*Brannon Braga*

-Where were you when the brains were handed out?
*Sonic the Hedgehog*

[This message has been edited by TerraZ (edited January 04, 2000).] - Sorry for the crappy ASCII TSN, it looks much better in DOS but I made them a little easier to understand. It just shows I much I love you !

(That's a joke just in case you take it the wrong way...)

[This message has been edited by TerraZ (edited January 04, 2000).]
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
I think that that is completely unintelligible. :-)

Anyway, I don't think that cutaway of the nacelle is right. Everything seems to suggest that the plasma injectors (if there is just the one set) are in the front of the nacelle. It doesn't make any sense, otherwise.

------------------
"...more people buy Harry Potter novels than the works of Alexander Pope, but that's no measure of their quality."
-Tom Aylward-Nally, December 29, 1999
 


Posted by Obese Penguin (Member # 271) on :
 
Im not sure this Cutaway is Canon so dont go ruining your existance just yet :-)

I was also puzzled by that schematic , i also thought that the Injectors were at the front of the Naccele.

But in my Surfing I found another pic (yes yet another pic to further confuse *LOL*)


This Picture supports the Schematic's accuracy so now im even more confused , arg! Why do I do this to myself? :-)

My thoery is that the injectors are in the back of naccele and they use some kind forcefield to manipulate the flow of the plamsa in the naccele .

The website i found this pic on is pretty cool buts mostly about cloaks
http://members.aol.com/jgrinter/cloaking.html

------------------
"Marge .. Do you have other men in this House ? .. Radioactive men?"
~Homer "The Simpsons"
http://www.geocities.com/travlyn2

[This message has been edited by Dhunter (edited January 04, 2000).]
 


Posted by Davok (Member # 143) on :
 
TerraZ, what made you think that the plasma is ejected from top AND bottom? I thought ir runs from bottom to top...

BTW, I think the cutaway is from the "fact files"; the guys how composed that picture probably watched "Eye of the Beholder" and took a close look at the Dhunter's pic.. and I still don't think that one proves that there are only 2 injectors. I believe the Technical Manual.

------------------
USS Allegiance LCARS Database


 


Posted by TerraZ on :
 
Well, in "EOB" plasma is ejected from the top and bottom injector, colliding in the middle and sent toward the front of the nacelle.

Otherwise, I don't see why, coming from the bottom one, it would suddenly separate in mid-air, one stream going foward and another one going up through the upper injector (which would no longer BE an injector) and end up nowhere.

Perhaps the colliding plasma stream are part of the warp field creation. Didn't Diana say that the warp field present when the guy jumped in the plasma was responsible for having his thoughts imprinted in the bulkhead even the though they weren't travelling at warp? By the way, I don't remember seeing that pic on screen. Do you think it's from the model?

------------------
-If you ask me, I think continuity is highly overrated...
*Brannon Braga*

-Where were you when the brains were handed out?
*Sonic the Hedgehog*
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Okay, here's a way to figure out where the injectors are (front or back)... In that nacelle cutaway pic, there's a vidcap from EotB. Unfortunately, Troi is blocking most of the view. Do we ever get to see clear to the other end of the nacelle in such a way that we can tell if the blue grills get wider there (as they do at the front of the nacelle), or if they just go straight on (making that the back, meaning the control room is at the front)?

------------------
"...more people buy Harry Potter novels than the works of Alexander Pope, but that's no measure of their quality."
-Tom Aylward-Nally, December 29, 1999
 


Posted by Davok (Member # 143) on :
 
Okay, it is injected from top and bottom. Good.

I am quite sure that I saw this pic on screen.

TSN, I don't see why we should doubt that the control room is in the back (this is given by the TechManual).

------------------
USS Allegiance LCARS Database


 


Posted by TerraZ on :
 
Actually, the Tech Manual doesn't say anything about a control room, it only says that the docking port under the nacelle near the back allows officers to enter the nacelle, but the top view of the interior of the nacelle doesn't have room for a control room in the back (there's some sort of off-axis field controller there instead).

And as for the blue grills, the edges of the warp coils end up just beside the blue grills. So even it it gets bigger, we wouldn't be able to see it because them. I suppose with all the evidences we have, the location of the control room is now a matter of choice unless someone can get some picture from the show to resolve the issue.

------------------
-If you ask me, I think continuity is highly overrated...
*Brannon Braga*

-Where were you when the brains were handed out?
*Sonic the Hedgehog*
 


Posted by Davok (Member # 143) on :
 
I didn't notice until yesterday that I actually have that episode on tape...
I watched it and there is one scene were you can see the blue grills very clearly (sorry, no pic). They don't seem to get any wider.

Anyway, I don't think the control room can be in the front. In EOTB, they get into the nacelle through a Jeffries tube which ends just behind the control room's door. If this tube runs through the nacelle's pylon, it can't end in the front of the nacelle (it' a vertical tube).

------------------
USS Allegiance LCARS Database


 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Well, that logic would but the control room in the middle of the nacelle.

Presumably, the Jeffries tube runs vertically up the pylon, then turns horizontal (either fore or aft, but I prefer fore), then goes back to vertical when it comes even w/ the control room.

------------------
"...more people buy Harry Potter novels than the works of Alexander Pope, but that's no measure of their quality."
-Tom Aylward-Nally, December 29, 1999
 


Posted by Davok (Member # 143) on :
 
But I remember Worf climbing up at least four decks at the very beginning of the episode. I don't think the nacelle has vertical tubes spanning more than two decks, if there are any at all.

------------------
USS Allegiance LCARS Database


 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Paramount doesn't have a vertical Jeffries Tube set four decks high, so there are bound to be cuts in that scene. And if there are cuts, then there can also be horizontal sections we missed because of the cuts...

The Tech Manual shows injectors on every coil, but IIRC, they are not between the coils - they are UNDERNEATH them! Or then inside the coil ring. They only become visible because parts of the coils are cut out in the picture.

Perhaps in drive mode these eighteen individual injectors fire from "below", "into" the coils, energizing them from "outside", and the one injector we see in the episode when the engine is on idle is just a sort of a "negative pole" that generates the nonpulsating inside plasma stream. The individual injectors take care of the pulsating effect that creates a proper propulsive field.

I can't understand what Mike and Rick were thinking when drawing the injectors "below" the nacelles - except if they are intended to fire "into" the nacelles. Or am I remembering the drawing incorrectly?

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Hm... I like your idea, if I'm understanding you correctly. Are you saying that the individual injectors at each coil are the ones that fire in succession, front to back, to make the ship go forward, while the big one in front is the one that stays active constantly, keeping the subspace field around even when they aren't in warp? I mean, we know there's still some sort of subspace field outside of warp, since the nacelles keep glowing, and there isn't any time dilation at impulse speeds. This could even explain why the control room might be at the back of the nacelle. If the big injector is not the one creating the moving field, it doesn't need to shoot from front to back.

------------------
"The Earl of Sandwich invented the sandwich. Samuel Morse invented the Morse Code. Plato invented the plate."
-Holly, Red Dwarf: "Parallel Universe"
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
That's exactly what I'm thinking. I think that the individual injectors are under the coils and "heat" them like the burners of a gas stove, in a pulsing peristaltic order, and the horizontal stream in the middle stays more or less static and serves as a sort of a "negative pole" to the "positive poles" of the excited coils.

It's pretty obvious that the engine doesn't work by constantly creating new plasma and pumping it through the nacelles like so much water or gasoline - if that were true, then the ship would be venting used plasma all the time. Instead, the warp core apparently just excites an existing plasma loop so that waves of energy travel along it to the nacelles. Of course, some residual plasma is created in incomplete annihilation and parasitic fusion reactions, and some is vented or used as impulse propellant. Mostly, though, it's the same plasma suspended in one place or perhaps being circulated.

The individual injectors firing on the undersides of the coil segments simply fire the energy - they do not constantly pump out volumes of plasma. Or perhaps the plasma somehow flows along the outer surface of the coil from bottom to top, to "plasma drains" we haven't seen yet? (It can't go inside the coil since a segment isn't hollow...)

As a ship reaches warp one, a huge white flash is created. I think this flash is the mark of an active subspace field (as is the red glow of the photon torpedoes). The blue glow that is also present on idle isn't the color of a warp field IMHO, but just plasma glow seen through a grille that lets "subspace radiation" and incidentally also blue visible light pass through. "Idle" subspace fields that keep Einstein sedated are probably more or less invisible to the naked eye.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Black Knight (Member # 134) on :
 
Kudos, Timo!
Once again, you got the basic idea of what I was going to say in a LOT MORE DETAIL! That 'heating' of the coils is the most viable in my opinion.

------------------
new siggy coming soon.


 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Well, I haven't got the TNGTM, so I can't look this up and I may be wrong, but...

I thought that the blue glow was supposed to be an indication that the coils were "active" (generating a subspace field).

Also, I was under the impression that the subspace field was a direct result of the contact between the plasma and the verterium cortenide (sp?) in the coils. Therefore, the stream shooting down the middle wouldn't have much contact w/ the coils, and thus wouldn't produce much of a field. However, the individual injectors at each segment would be shooting plasma right onto the coils, making a much more potent field. As for what happens to the plasma, it probably cools back down into a gas and either recycled or, if the plasma/coil interaction somehow makes it unusable, vented invisibly out of the nacelles. The few times we have actually seen plasma being vented, it could either be the fact that it is plasma, thus hot, thus glowing, making it visible, or it might be that it would normally be invisible, but they show it to us on TV so we get a better effect (kinds like sound in space; we know it isn't there, but we accept it as something added in for effect).

------------------
"The Earl of Sandwich invented the sandwich. Samuel Morse invented the Morse Code. Plato invented the plate."
-Holly, Red Dwarf: "Parallel Universe"
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
All very good ideas. Perhaps the role of the centrally firing horizontal plasma stream is not so much to excite the coils but to serve as a "return loop" of sorts? Since the plasma that hits the coils must travel on their surface instead of inside them, perhaps some leaks away, and is collected in a centrally mounted forcefield "drainpipe" which feeds it back to the overall plasma loop? I'd still be happier if the horizontal stream had an active role in transmitting energy, though.

The only cases where we see the grilles of TNG-era ships black are when the ship is completely shut down, crippled, or changing its dilithium crystals as in the beginning of "Skin of Evil" (although a "hot swap" later becomes a possibility). Even quayside ships (like the E-D at DS9) usually keep their grilles lit. The Defiant seems to be turned off when docked, though.

I'd assume that the blue glow is directly related to presence of plasma in the nacelles but not to other status of the nacelles (idle, sublight, warp). When powered down, the ship purges the plasma loops completely so the grilles go black. When on idle, plasma is present in the loop but not firing at the coils, just flowing through the nacelle horizontally - enough to cause the blue glow. When active, plasma begins to fire at the coils, too. Ultimately, the warp flash results.

Timo Saloniemi

 


Posted by Davok (Member # 143) on :
 
BTW, I think the blue glow at the side the nacelles results from the Cherenkov Radiation emitted by the plasma stream (I remember the TechManual saying something like this).

------------------
USS Allegiance LCARS Database


 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
*wishes he had the TM, so he could see exactly what it says* I'm gonna have to go get me one of those, eh? :-)

------------------
"The Earl of Sandwich invented the sandwich. Samuel Morse invented the Morse Code. Plato invented the plate."
-Holly, Red Dwarf: "Parallel Universe"
 


Posted by Treknophyle (Member # 509) on :
 
"As for what happens to the plasma, it probably cools back down into a gas and either recycled or, if the plasma/coil interaction somehow makes it unusable, vented invisibly out of the nacelles. The few times we have actually seen plasma being vented, it could either be the fact that it is plasma, thus hot, thus glowing, making it visible, or it might be that it would normally be invisible, but they show it to us on TV so we get a better effect (kinds like sound in space; we know it isn't there, but we accept it as something added in for effect)."

Agree on all counts exdcept recycling.
1) When the vessel is producing a lot of plasma (which as I understand it is a gas which has been so thermally-excited that electrons are stripped from their nuclei - thus ionizing it), the vessel is travelling at multiples of c. Thus, the amount of used-exhaust plasma being vented at any particular POV in space would be infinitesimal - but would in fact exist.

2) Vessels travelling at warp leave an ion trail which can be detected and tracked later. This could be the residual plasma, which although cooled back down to ambient temperature (2-3 degrees Kelvin?), would still be ionized, as the stripped electrons would not always re-affix to all nuclei. Could it be this ion trail which, repeated by vessel after vessel, causes the degradation of the subspace continuum mentioned in various episodes? And that said problem has been counteracted/alleviated by better de-ionizing or less transatating of plasma in newer vessels such as the Sovereign and Intrepid classes?

3) As I recall from phaser discussions, over-stimulated matter "dematerializes" - which is to say it 'transtates' from normal space into subspace (it does not convert to energy, or everytime a red-shirt was dematerialized, there would be an earth-shattering kaboom). It might be reasonable to postulate that, in the extreme conditions involved in the creation of a subspace field in the nacelles, some or most of the plasma is transtated into subspace as well.

4 I doubt that the leftover plasma could be recycled. Although it is ionized deuterium (highly-energized bonded proton pairs with one or no electrons), handling same prior to cooling would be almost as hazardous a task as handling antimatter plasma. [Although, since it is ionized, a magnetic field could manipulate it). It is much more likely that the used plasma is somehow made to proceed laterally to the glowing blue grids, and passes through them into space. This might be facilitated by the gap between the upper and lower coil halves.
 


Posted by Daniel (Member # 453) on :
 
On the issue of the glowing nacelle grilles . . .

(possible spoiler for VGR "The Void")

$
$
$
$
$

When Voyager's warp engines were completely off line, after trying to escape the void, the core powered down, the nacelle grilles were still lit. It's clear as day that the core is defunct. No swirling blue patterns. But for some reason, the nacelles still had power.

Is this a continuity error?
 


Posted by Michael Dracon (Member # 4) on :
 
I'd count that as a continuity error.

On a side note: How in the world did we end up with this thread again? This thing is over a year old...

------------------
Terry: "Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, ...."
Max: "And?"
Terry: "I forgot."
Max: "Come on, Clinton was the fun one, then came the boring one."
Terry: "They're all boring."

- Batman Beyond (aka: Batman of the Future)

 


Posted by Treknophyle (Member # 509) on :
 
My fault (maximus culpea).

I'm new to the BBS, and just replying for the fun of it whenever I see something interesting. Unfortunately, as my wife says, I'm interested in EVERYTHING.

- Fijagdh
 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3