T O P I C ��� R E V I E W
|
MIB
Member # 426
|
posted
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think this topic has ever been discussed. Has anyone ever noticed whenever the holodeck is off, it is quite small, but when it is on, it is huge?I know all about the little treadmill effect generated via forcefields under the holoedeck user's feet so that he/she can cover "huge" distances while staying in the same place. However, this explanation is not satisfactory to me. Many times now we have seen multiple people use one holodeck at the same time and be very far apart from each other. Distances between 2 people would be larger than the floor size of the holodeck! The Voy episodes 'Fair Haven' and 'Spirit Folk' is proof of this. I don't even need to mention the other episodes in VOY and TNG that support this. And so I've been wondering. While a holodeck is on does it become dimensionally transcendental?? In other words, while the holodeck is on, does it literally become larger on the inside than it is on the outside via some wierd quantum flux type thing???? [ July 15, 2001: Message edited by: MIB ]
|
Ryan McReynolds
Member # 28
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by MIB: And so I've been wondering. While a holodeck is on does it become dimensionally transcendental?? In other words, while the holodeck is on, does it literally become larger on the inside than it is on the outside via some wierd quantum flux type thing????
Um, no. This is hardly a new question... the holodeck simply projects a wall between the two people and makes virtual holodecks for each of them, with independent imagery and sound fields.
|
MIB
Member # 426
|
posted
I guess that's a good explanation. But somehow, I don't feel that's right. hmmmm
|
TSN
Member # 31
|
posted
It is right. As I recall, this is the explanation put forth by the TNGTM, and the one that's generally accepted. Not that TPTB seem to care what's generally accepted, but I doubt they'll have any reason to contradict this one.
|
Shik
Member # 343
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by MIB: While a holodeck is on does it become dimensionally transcendental?? In other words, while the holodeck is on, does it literally become larger on the inside than it is on the outside via some wierd quantum flux type thing????
"NEW!! for Starfleet vessels, 2361! The HOLODECK!! From TardisCo!!"
|
Stingray
Member # 621
|
posted
If anybody's read Shatner's novels, there's a part in one of them where Spock and Kirk break out of a Vulcan holding cell which is also a holodeck (to prevent the occupents from finding the exit). They break out of it using the whole independent imagery thing. I think 'Avenger' is the one, they're all very good books.
|
Veers
Member # 661
|
posted
I've learned not to trust his books. A Romulan-Borg alliance? A Defiant-class USS Monitor? The Farragut being assimilated after "Generations?" Kirk's one million lives? They may be good books, but not exactly "canon." (Which isn't a bad thing, actually)
|
Eclipse
Member # 472
|
posted
The really cool holo-trick was in Boogeymen, in which there was a holodeck simulating a blank holodeck.
|
Joshua Bell
Member # 327
|
posted
The "compartmentalization" of holodecks is *not* mentioned in the ST:TNG:TM. At the time that was written, I'm not sure if any episodes actually demanded that sort of technology.
|
PsyLiam
Member # 73
|
posted
Encounter at Farpoint? Riker shouts to Data, and Data doesn't hear him. They have to be over a holodeck distance apart.Elementary Dear Data, Pulaski is kept a long distance away from the rest of the people on the holodeck. Possibly the Big Goodbye too, I can't remember. So, yeah. Pretty much every episode demanded it. Boogeymen was a good book. The weirdo-holodeck stuff was quite original at the time, pre-empting Ship in a Bottle by a couple of years.
|
Treknophyle
Member # 509
|
posted
Encounter at Farpoint? Riker shouts to Data, and Data doesn't hear him. They have to be over a holodeck distance apart.- Not so. Simple sound-cancelling field. Elementary Dear Data, Pulaski is kept a long distance away from the rest of the people on the holodeck.
- Not so. Trick perspective (you know, bending light - the stuff holograms are made of) I'm still trying to figure out how people can play baseball in the damned things.
|
TSN
Member # 31
|
posted
Treknophyle: That was Liam's point. Someone said that, when the TNGTM was written, those issues had never come up in episodes. He was giving examples of episodes in which they did.
|
Joshua Bell
Member # 327
|
posted
In "Encounter at Farpoint" [TNG], another possible explanation is that the simulation was too noisy - there were trees and running water and other distractions. Data also wasn't paying too close attention. Also, that episode shows explicit interaction of a rock with the holodeck walls; in a decent simulation the rock would simply be dematerialized and a hologram projected. The software must differ between that simulation and most of the rest of what we see.In "Elementary, Dear Data" [TNG] it's conceivable that the London simulation was convoluted, and fit within the confines of the Holodeck. The Sherlock Holmes episodes antedate the Bynars upgrade of the holodeck, so it's possible they added the compartmentalization code. ... In any case, I have a FAQ on this: http://www.calormen.com/Star_Trek/FAQs/holodeck-faq.htm Needs updating, but then what FAQ doesn't?
|
Wes1701E
Member # 212
|
posted
Yep thats all TNGTM stuff
|
Stingray
Member # 621
|
posted
quote: Also, that episode shows explicit interaction of a rock with the holodeck walls; in a decent simulation the rock would simply be dematerialized and a hologram projected. The software must differ between that simulation and most of the rest of what we see.
Probably Data programmed that for that special occasion just to examine the nifty techno.
|
TSN
Member # 31
|
posted
"In "Encounter at Farpoint" [TNG], another possible explanation is that the simulation was too noisy - there were trees and running water and other distractions. Data also wasn't paying too close attention." With Data's computerized ears? I doubt it... The throwing-a-rock-against-the-wall thing I understood in EaF. The technology was still kind of slow. But, when they did it in "Ship in a Bottle", it didn't make much sense. Shouldn't the holodeck have been able to accomodate that sort of thing by that time?
|
Bernd
Member # 6
|
posted
quote: And so I've been wondering. While a holodeck is on does it become dimensionally transcendental?? In other words, while the holodeck is on, does it literally become larger on the inside than it is on the outside via some wierd quantum flux type thing????
I don't think so. On many occasions we could see people enter and exit from both sides of the holodeck, and the scale stayed the same. It also wouldn't comply with some of the holodeck failures, most notably in "Night" when it went offline and just froze. It's already hard to explain how this could possible with a 1/1 scale holodeck when the projectors go offline, but in quantum flux it should be quite dangerous if whatever controls everything inside fails (i.e. more dangerous a place than it seems to be anyway).
|
Stingray
Member # 621
|
posted
that'd must be damn dangerous, Bernd, considering the shit that's gone down in these relatively 'benign' holodecks.
|