This is topic Enterprise Tech Continued ["Fight or Flight" $$$] in forum Starships & Technology at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/6/1403.html

Posted by Mark Nguyen (Member # 469) on :
 
The first regular episode aired on Tuesday for my area. Since "Enterprise" skipped the pilot stage and went straight to regular production, there were no real differences in story setup or props to be seen. What follows are tech-related notes about the episode of particular interest. Spoilers ahead...

-Name dropping: Dr. Phlox mentions the Nausicaans!Plus, the guest race in this epsiode are the Anxanar, and as a result of Hoshi they eventually get off on a good footing with them. The Axanar are androgynous and live around 400 years, by he way.

-Away missions (no offical term for it yet) are a really big deal. Lots of preparations go into it, and they tend to bring a lot of equipment over to accomplish their mission.

-And they use the shuttles to go there and back. Some sort of docking adapter is on the top on the ship, which rotates as necessary to attach to hatches and stuff. In this episode, they attach to the "top" of the ship to get in, and flip upside down. The shuttle has visible maneivering jets, too.

-Speaking of which, we see *why* the shuttlebay has two decks - you biard the shuttles throught the top, via a drop-down stair that extends to it! Pretty neat. Docking takes a bit of doing, and is a fragile process.

-The "plasma rifles" *are* apparently redresses of the Jem'Haddar rifles, themselves redresses of previous guest weapons. Oh well. The phase pistols have a top/front section that opens up like a revolver, and has a glowey power cell or something inside that can pop out.

-We see the armory this episode, which is probably one of two in the forward section. It features two loading cradles forward, with two tubes into which torpedoes are loaded. The four ports on the underside of the hull are the torpedo tubes. Aft, the torpedo is launched from the suspended pod(!). Whaddya know...

-The torpedoes themselves are long, metallic, pointed and with a pinched section in the middle. They're pretty slow when fired, and the episode is partly about getting them to target and explode properly. Even when they DO work, they still don't seem very powerful.

-This is part of what I am liking about this show - they seem to be clearly outmatched by other races thus far, and have to get out of situations by their wits instead of technobabble crap. Voyager, the E-D, and the E-nil tended to be on equal or greater footing with their antagonists tech -wise, or could use their tech to get out of situations. On the Pre-E, everything is experimental and realtively low-tech.

-The bad guys who were killing the Axanar are unknown, but come in a ship that looks like a Neitzchean fighter from "Andromeda". They have tractor beam technology but use boarding tubes a la later Vidiian episodes. They were killing the Axanar and extracting some compound for their own use. Finding the Pre-E, they start doing the same thing when another Axanar ship shows up to save them, after Hoshi learns their language.

-Speaking of which, this is mostly a Hoshi episode, focussing on her getting used to space travel and exploration. The clip we've seen of her screaming is actually a significant plot point: the first time aboard the ship, Hoshi freaks out when she sees the dead crew, and is really ashamed later about screaming "like a 12 year-old". She eventually gets through her crisis with the help of an obtuse metaphor involving a slug. Overall, not badly done.

Bah, that's enough. You guys fill in the rest tonight.

Mark
 


Posted by Harry (Member # 265) on :
 
In what way did Plox mention the Nausicaans? (and for God's sake,WHY!?)
 
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
The Axanar (sp.) are a good nod to a couple of old TOS stories, and itll be interesting to see how their situation develops into the references made in those shows ('Court Martial', 'Whom Gods Destroy')

Actually i cant think of any good reason why there shouldnt be mention of Nausicaans on Enterprise. I think Enterprise needs to be a vehicle for established races (i.e. our first contacts with them) from the older series, not new races that will mysteriously disappear before the later series begin
 


Posted by Mark Nguyen (Member # 469) on :
 
The Nausicaans were mentioned in a scene between Trip and Phlox in the mess hall. Trip was depressed that they'd been going for weeks without anything exciting happening, and Phlox countered that everything on the ship was eciting to him. Among things, the odor given off by a certain (female) crewman was remarkably like that of a Nausicaan to him.

Mark
 


Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
although i do hate little alien name dropping like that.. like Neelix with his.. look i have *alien name here* pasta and *funny name here* pate. unecessary
 
Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :
 
But isn't it this sort of name-dropping that builds a coherent Trek universe, the sort of thing that the fans are crying out for? Isn't reinforcing the notion that this very much part of the same saga as the one that we've come to learn so many intricate details about just a subset of that term continuity?

Or is it just called continuity when Ron Moore does it and pointless name-dropping when Braga does it?
 


Posted by Michael_T (Member # 144) on :
 
As long as they don't mention Q or show him during the 22nd Century stint, I should be fine.
 
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
Well, if you are going to refer to Andorian blues or something, yes i approve.. but the random things like Andonian tea, Tarkalean tea, ad infinitum builds up an array of useless and often contradictory references (because they are nearly impossible to keep track of) Who are the Andonians? who are the Tarkaleans? all we have of them is their tea.. are they species? it is approaching critical mass (see: five species of Talarians, Takarans, etc....)
Why not concentrate on fleshing out things we already have?
The Nausicaan reference seemed to have little to do with the Nausicaans themselves.. and if thats the way it goes.. does it mean Nausicaans smell good? or did that woman smell bad? Is anybody going to care later.
Its like saying Vulcan has no moon, but nobody is really going to stick to that when they have a chance to show you this Big Moon over Vulcan

[ October 03, 2001: Message edited by: CaptainMike ]


 
Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :
 
It wasn't pointless. What do you think a woman's like if she's said to smell like a large angry ugly alien? What do you think of a person who delivers such a line? It's blunt observations like this that will give Phlox his alien-ness. Especially interesting about the name-dropping is the fact that Berman and Braga, are, *gasp*, writing something into the script that only a tiny portion of the audience will get. Few viewers will even know what a Nausicaan is, let alone put a name to a face to an episode.

As for name drops being useless. Well, let's take my favourites, the Breen. The entire culture was built-up in a series of little name drops here and there over six years.

You're right about there being essentially a criticial mass of already-established names, and "Tarkalean" being a throwaway line that is truly throwaway. But why complain about an episode that uses two already-established names and recycles them? How exactly is a Nausicaan reference any different than an Andorian one?
 


Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
my problem isnt as much with Phlox's comment, as much as it is with how common this became in Voyager.. especially by Neelix

And the Breen thing was awesome, because they kept threading it through. Although they did lose track of the original reference, which was that the Breen used disruptors ('Hero Worship' & 'Generations', but by the time we saw a Breen they had left phaser burns ('Indiscretion'). but i had fun figuring that out too

[ October 03, 2001: Message edited by: CaptainMike ]


 
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
I'd guess Neelix' alien references were just silliness. After all, didn't he refer to things like "[random alien name] spaghetti", and such? Aliens wouldn't make spaghetti. Neelix was probably making spaghetti, and throwing in something that's associated w/ such-and-such race. Then he calls it "such-and-such race spaghetti". After all, that's what Neelix did. He mixed and matched foods to come up w/ a "new" and "exciting" menu for the crew.

At least Phlox' reference to the Nausicaans is a real observation about something on his part. If he had said something like "This food tastes remarkably like a Nausicaan spaghetti I once had...", then I would worry.
 


Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :
 
Tim: Well, a Nausicaan foodstuff might be called "gorush-daana" and consist of a hardened extruded paste of grains from a native Nausicaan wheat-like plant that is subsequently boiled in water and served with a sauce made from the tails of an amphibious creature that lives in tropical swamps near Nausicaa's equator. The Universal Translator might work its hocus pocus and figure out that the stuff is pretty similar to spaghetti in concept and change "gorush-daana" to "Nausicaan Spaghetti."
 
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
Except that if they put that in the show it would be Neelix-like, it would suck, and i would hate them forever and ever and hope that they died
 
Posted by The359 (Member # 37) on :
 
The armory is definatly nice looking. Torpedoes are loaded just like the big guns on naval battleships.
 
Posted by Siegfried (Member # 29) on :
 
I just saw the first act of the episode, and I'm in agreement with The359. The torpedo/armory set is definitely nice-looking. It reminds me a lot of a submarine. That was a nice effect of the rapid loading of the torpedo and watching it get fired. I would really have liked to see the actual loading of the torpedo onto the launcher. I liked the console layout in the room. Is this just one of two rooms (since it had two visible launch tubes) or is there just the one room (with each launcher feeding two tubes)?
 
Posted by The359 (Member # 37) on :
 
There appear to be 4 tubes, so I'm guessing here is 1 room per 2 tubes. Makes sense. Not smart to put the entire armory in one single room.
 
Posted by Siegfried (Member # 29) on :
 
Towards the end of the episode, Archer made a reference to "both tubes." So it sounds like only two of those holes are for the torpedoes. I guess the other two holes are for the plasma battery we saw in "Broken Bow." Plus, there's also, apparently, a rear tube in that pod. Damn it, and I was so hoping that was the engine room.
 
Posted by The359 (Member # 37) on :
 
I believe the plasma shots we saw in "Broken Bow" came from the top of the saucer.
 
Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :
 
Yup, the plasma artillery came exclusively from the top of the saucer.

Perhaps the other two tubes are fired from a second armoury room that has yet to be fully outfitted?
 


Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
I'm just waiting for them to try to convince us its old style by showing the gun crews rolling out the plasma cannons, swabbing them out, dropping in the plasma, opening the port and touching the fuse to fire

a guy can hope....
 


Posted by TheF0rce (Member # 533) on :
 
haha
you got to hand it to enterprise, their weapons suck ass!

and mesa likes!
its quite a change to see how earth ships don't simply rule the galaxy becuase they're the good guys...

i got a whole babylon 5 feel toward enterpirse's weapon capabilities, by that i mean earth force ships in B5 were pretty bad and were almost always outgunned by aliens.

I hope they will improve her weapons slightly,
its brings great luaghter to see the enterprise fire off a barrage of pulse fire and miss every shot!

Then she fire her precious missiles and you can hear the tension, then the aliens just brush them aside with their shields and weapons!!! LOL
"oh my god, ha!" they're screwed and its fun to see.


Now back to more serious note, what more can we conclude about the enterprise's "shields" or primitive version/armor hybrid.

The first alien fire that impacted on the front of the bridge seemed to have resulted in a more shield like effect than some field enforced armor[ as previously hinted from dialogue]
The second fire went clean through, i'm surprised the enterprise is not in a much worse state since the alien ship pounded her several rounds while the shuttle ever so slowly got back into the hanger.

One last comment, i have to say that the explosions were a little "fake" and the alien harvestor ship too, something about her outer hull lighting was very fake,
the design is good though, very menacing looking even when sitting still.

[ October 03, 2001: Message edited by: TheF0rce ]


 
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
'mesa likes'?

ugh
 


Posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim (Member # 646) on :
 
I didn't like that rear-firing torp tube. It seemed wrong. Wasn't there something in the TNG tech manual that said they didn't cover the rear "blind spot" until the 23rd century?

On the whole though, I like this new show. They haven't yet fucked over continuity of events, even though tech-wise it doesn't look older than TOS. Liked the reference to the Axanar.

-MMoM
 


Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
I don't remember that.
 
Posted by Siegfried (Member # 29) on :
 
I just checked, and the TNG Technical Manual doesn't say much about rear-firing torpedo launchers. Mr. Scott's Guide to the Enterprise does talk about adding a rear-facing torpedo launcher to the Enterprise-A, but it was only said to be elimenating a tactical blindspot. Of course, I don't think the Enterprise-A had a rear-firing torpedo tube in the first place.
 
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
Um, not to say that the TNG tech manual was leaving a blank, but the E-D's rear firing tube as featured quite prominently in 'Encounter at Farpoint' .. (remember. it was the first one?) and is visible in many graphics in thst book
 
Posted by Siegfried (Member # 29) on :
 
But we're not talking about "Encounter at Farpoint." We're talking about whether the TNG Technical Manual says that rear-firing torpedo launchers were an advancement installed on starships in the 23rd century. I checked, and the TNG Technical Manual does not say such a thing.
 
Posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim (Member # 646) on :
 
I stand corrected. I probably got it from Mr. Scott's Guide. Still seems a bit wrong though, doesn't it? I mean, the E-nil was supposed to be Starfleet's "best" ship, and it didn't have a rear tube...
 
Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :
 
...that we saw.

We also didn't see any lifeboats, are we to assume that if the ship was critically hit everyone was screwed?

We didn't see thrusters, either, so are we to assume it could only perform tight maneuvers using its main impulse engine?
 


Posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim (Member # 646) on :
 
Well, unlike those other things, from looking at the model there's no possible way for there to be a rear torp-tube. As to thrusters and lifeboats, those could be interpreted as things on the model. Perhaps the lifeboats are deployed from that big round yellow hatch on the underside of the engineering hull. Perhaps the thruster are hidden in the nacelle ends or are those little dots we see near the impulse engines. But there is definitely NO rear torpedo tube.
 
Posted by Siegfried (Member # 29) on :
 
It's hard to discern anything on the original Enterprise model by watching The Original Series. If I recall correctly, the underside of the saucer section didn't have anything looking like weapons ports. Yet, we saw the phaser beams and photon torpedoes come from there. I guess the designers of the Constitution class really wanted that smooth look by hiding everything with seamless covers (like the lifeboats, weapons ports, thrusters, airlocks, etc.).
 
Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :
 
Indeed. I think Siegfried makes the most valid point of all: The 1701 had about as much evidence of a rear-firing launcher on the model as a forward-firing launcher.
 
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
Sigfrieds explanation is the reality of why the 1701 was designed the way it was.. Matt Jefferies decided that, since it would be dangerous for anything that needed to be serviced to be on the exterior of the hull, the rationale was that any equipment or ports would be safely inside the protection of the hull, and this was decided to keep with Gene Roddenberry's call for the ship to lack technical detail, basically he didnt want there to be any greeblies on it.

By the way, it seems likely 1701 couldnt rear fire, what does that have to do with NX-01? Just because the Constitution's design didnt lend itself to the addition of a rear firing tube, whos to say that its predecessor wouldnt be able to? Theyve been making cars with power windows for decades, but they still make cars without power windows too? Why? Cost, feasibility, design preference.. etc.. the point being that even though one ship had them, doesnt mean theyd be added to every ship after them.

Ships of the Star Fleet depicted an upgrade of the Constitution-class refits, the USS America that was identical to the E-A except with the back of the torpedo tube module containing a rear tube. It'd be interesting to see the studio model in that area, most blueprints of the E-no suffix refit label it as the torpedo waste vent, but if the E-A model had an area that lookedl ike it could launch a torp, then maybe it could have.

And if somebody said starships didnt have rear firing tubes before the 24th century, then f*ck that because its obviously wrong. The NX-01 had them.

[ October 05, 2001: Message edited by: CaptainMike ]


 
Posted by Siegfried (Member # 29) on :
 
The only thing I don't like about the rear-firing torpedo launcher on the new Enterprise is that the torpedo was launched from that pod. Damn it, I so wanted that pod to be the engineering section!
 
Posted by David Templar (Member # 580) on :
 
What is that pod for, then? Seems kinda silly to devote an entire pod to torpedoes, unless of course, the NX-01 really is an Akira in disguise.
 
Posted by pIn'a' Sov (Member # 293) on :
 
I�m wondering about the second Axanar ship. Is that a different design than the first?
 
Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
It could be that the pod exists mainly to house that blue glowing dome thingamabob, and any additional equipment is just, well, additional.

The blue thing could be very, very important to the ship - after all, the Constitution-refits, Sydneys and some Excelsiors had one, and Constellations, Mirandas and some Excelsiors actually had two. It could also be completely superfluous, since the TOS ship and the TNG vessels had none. But whatever it is, it's reasonably large and reasonably radiant. Perhaps it's a good idea to keep it away from the inhabited parts of the hull...

Putting the aft torp launcher there seems like a jolly bad idea to me, though. Especially if the pod already houses big and dangerous equipment, and torp preparation and launching requires manual labor. A properly designed ship (from the TV show standpoint, even if not necessarily from the engineering one) ought to have weapon emplacements that look like weapon emplacements and are all installed using a common logic, like a seagoing warship's gun turrets or torpedo tube clusters or VLS cassettes. You don't mount one gun in a turret on the forecastle and then have another one swing from cables between the masts. If the main hull is good enough for forward torps, it ought to be good enough for the aft ones as well.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by NightWing (Member # 4) on :
 
quote:
The only thing I don't like about the rear-firing torpedo launcher on the new Enterprise is that the torpedo was launched from that pod. Damn it, I so wanted that pod to be the engineering section!

Well, actually, someone in the episode said that a 3 meter difference on a target could mean you'd hit the warp core instead of the weapons. He could be refering to the Enterprise here, meaning the pods holds both the rear torpedo launcher and the warp core.
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
No, he was talking about the target ship. If you aim for their weapons, trying to disarm them, and you aim wrong, you could hit the warp core and kill them all.

As for the rear torp launcher... If it were in the main hull, wouldn't you have to shoot around the pod? That doesn't seem very efficient.
 


Posted by NightWing (Member # 4) on :
 
What target ship? They were talking about it before the target practice. There was no ship around at that time.
 
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
A hypothetical target ship. The point was that they needed to get everything working properly before getting into a real battle. Otherwise, when they shoot at a real ship, they run the risk of hitting the wrong thing and blowing it up.
 
Posted by David Templar (Member # 580) on :
 
And being without energy shielding and slow, the subspace shockwave from the core breach would turn the Enterprise into little bits of matter. The relatively short range of the weapon doesn't help.
 


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3