T O P I C ��� R E V I E W
|
Mark Nguyen
Member # 469
|
posted
http://www.gilsostartrekschematics.co.uk/index.htmlPardon my French, but - Holy Poo! Mark
|
Malnurtured Snay
Member # 411
|
posted
I would 'ave ter second yer there! Oi! 'oly poo! Blimey!
|
Veers
Member # 661
|
posted
It looks good, but not yet "poo" quality, I say.
|
The Vorlon
Member # 52
|
posted
Hey, good! Gerard finally got his page up! He'd been supplying my blueprints for years... =]Speaking of schematics, would anyone like scans of the 1701-C blueprints from the 2002 TNG calender? They are by far the most accurate diagrams of the ship ever...
|
Mark Nguyen
Member # 469
|
posted
Duh! Please!Mark <--- E-C nut
|
Reverend
Member # 335
|
posted
Yes, by all means!
|
AndrewR
Member # 44
|
posted
What was the reason for them using the E-C blue-prints this year? Any particular reason?Andrew
|
Gerard Gillan
Member # 684
|
posted
Well to the gentleman who said Poo to the site. Please point me to yout Url of the same subject and I can give you my opinion. I have been at this for 3 Years scanning learning HTML, PhotoShop 6.0 programme, Corel Draw 9.0 graphic programme just to mention a few things etc. You cannot please every body.. but thank you for taking the time to view my site and making a comment. Its is still under Construction. Gilso
|
Mark Nguyen
Member # 469
|
posted
Hi Gerard - my "poo" comment was a compliment to your work, as a potentially humourous alternative to saying "shit". My apologies if that was misinterpreted as an insult, which is far from the truth. The site rocks, man!Mark
|
Gerard Gillan
Member # 684
|
posted
Mark I was not refering to your good self I understand your "Poo" statement, that you where taken back by the site in general. The quality and the quantity was better than what you had come to expect.... My statment was directed at Veers Senior Member # 661 who make his opinion at this notice board. I thank him for his time anyway and well no matter how hard you try, there will always be people who are just out to try and put people down... And just to finally put the nail into the coffin on the "Poo" statement. The idea of the design of the site was to give a blueprint/schematic but under construction feel to the site, redrawing and improving on a design etc, if you look at the title headers they have construction arrows on them.. Use the nav graphic's and you see they change with a mouse over effect to solid text. This was the idea. Such is with the world.. The site still needs fine tuning, on the index page, I still have to add the Comments section, links page and a counter etc... Thanks to all who have visited my site and made there comments welcome, specially to Adam the Vorlon, his work I have greatly admired over the years and helped him develop his own charts... Gerard
|
Aban Rune
Member # 226
|
posted
Nice Gerard. The site looks great and there're alot of neat pics. Is that Nova Class MSD official? It looks cool but I don't think I've ever seen it before.
|
Timo
Member # 245
|
posted
I have seen it around but I'm not sure if it is original. It does have incorrectly placed forward torpedo launchers and other errors, but I'd guess the real thing could have those as well.Timo Saloniemi
|
CaptainMike
Member # 709
|
posted
Saladin Saladin Saladin
|
Malnurtured Snay
Member # 411
|
posted
POOO!In a good way, of course. Great site. I'd love to see Enterprise in those size-comp charts, though.
|
Gerard Gillan
Member # 684
|
posted
Some body ask for a look at the Enterprise-C schematics from the 2002 TNG calander.. Here is it hot off the press.. (1mb d/load size) http://www.gilsostartrekschematics.co.uk/bprintlinks/ent-calander.jpg This is for you Reverend as you asked for it, and Mark Nguyen as Scotty said "Up your Shaft" in Star Trek III "The Search for Spock" -------------------------------------------------
CaptainMike you posted a few Words Sadalin x3 times. Could you please enlighten! us other poor mortals to your Request.. ----------------------------------------------- I personally do not really like the way the Ent-C has been wired framed here.. Any-Body else want to comment.. GilsoGilso Star Trek Schematics
|
PopMaze
Member # 302
|
posted
Holy crap! That's one sweet set of blueprints of the Ent-C. Is that foward torp launcher actually two small launchers? It looks like it.
|
The359
Member # 37
|
posted
It's SALADIN, you misspelled it on your page as SADALIN. We were just trying to tell you to correct it.While you're at it, you're history write-up on the DS9 schematics needs to be checked, there are a load of sentence fragments and it makes no sense.
|
Balaam Xumucane
Member # 419
|
posted
Wow. Really nice, Gerard. Really, really nice. So the outlines were done in CorelDraw? Damn. Very great job. Very impressive.
|
Gerard Gillan
Member # 684
|
posted
I accept that I made an error in spelling the word Saladin and thank you for pointing this out. The DS9 History was an idea, but the feedback from other people say that it really does not go well. I will update when I can.. Well again thanks to everyone who has help me out this day, will be in touch soon. Gilso
|
Sol System
Member # 30
|
posted
Er...woah.
|
Aban Rune
Member # 226
|
posted
The "wire framing" on those Ent-C blueprints are actually the hull plate divisions. I have the AMT model and it looks very similar to that. It looks like there's a mesh laid over the whole thing.I think the reason it looks funky is because the outlines of the ship aren't thicker.
|