T O P I C ��� R E V I E W
|
The Mighty Monkey of Mim
Member # 646
|
posted
Wow. They're mighty pretty! Check it out...
http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/sfmuseum/constitution-2views.jpg
-MMoM [ April 27, 2002, 16:14: Message edited by: The Mighty Monkey of Mim ]
|
Mark Nguyen
Member # 469
|
posted
Mighty pretty? Pretty mighty, I'd say.
Mark
|
Dax
Member # 191
|
posted
A bit of nitpicking:
There are too many rows of windows on the side view. There should be only five rows on the neck, and eight on the rest of the secondary hull.
Unfortunately this is hard to explain unless you already know about it. Apparently the bottom of the secondary hull shouldn't have the weird curve. All the official schematics have it but it's inaccurate.
|
Masao
Member # 232
|
posted
It's close enough for government work! But I'll have to check on the windows again.
Anyways, this is my first schematic using the accurate, slightly greenish "Starfleet Gray." I think it makes the ship a bit more interesting, don't you agree? I also put in a very subtle deflector grid and the tan ring. I'll probably have to go back and redraw all my other ships using the same shade of gray
|
Dax
Member # 191
|
posted
Another minor bitch: I think the tapering of the nacelles is meant to be more subtle.
But please don't get me wrong, Masao. The schematic is beautiful and infinitly better than I could produce.
|
Wraith
Member # 779
|
posted
I like!! I also like the new fighters, good work!
|
Masao
Member # 232
|
posted
BTW: My schematics were based on blueprints by a guy named Alan Everhart, who died in the turret explosion aboard USS Iowa. I got them from a 3-D modeling friend (sorry, I can't distribute copies). Everhart's schematics are regarded by modelers as the most accurate available, since they were based on measurements of the 11-foot miniature rather than on previously circulated "official" schematics.
Edit: The Everhart schematics were recently posted at Cult TV man's SF modeling site: http://www.culttvman.com/assets/images-STAR_TREK/dmerEndia-001a.JPG As, I said, these are considered extremely accurate, but I think the deflector grid on the top of the primary hull are incorrect, as can be seen from this photo of the never-repainted surface (from the IDIC page): http://www.uah.edu/~jim/nasm4.jpg [ April 13, 2002, 07:02: Message edited by: Masao ]
|
Matrix
Member # 376
|
posted
Wow, a guy did Trek stuff was in that turret. For some reason that suprises me.
I like the schematic, but really don't think any Starfleet ship had that type of greyish look to it. All throughout TOS, we see a slight light bluish Enterprise.
|
Sol System
Member # 30
|
posted
Those dates are kind of curious.
|
Masao
Member # 232
|
posted
Dates? What do you mean?
Anyway, he's another article about the color of Enterprise from CultTVman. It says Enterprise was greenish gray. http://www.culttvman.com/what_color_is_the_classic_ente.html
|
Dax
Member # 191
|
posted
Everything else is arguable but there's definitely only 5 rows of windows on the neck.
|
Sol System
Member # 30
|
posted
quote: CAPTAIN KIRK,J T. 09 05 2264 - 01 14 2270
CAPTAIN DECKER, D W. 01 14 2270 - cco
|
Masao
Member # 232
|
posted
Oh, those dates. I didn't read them. Don't really care, anyway.
I agree that they are too many windows on the neck (and probably elsewhere). They must have bled through from an earlier version of my schematic. I'll fix 'em.
|
Anduril
Member # 654
|
posted
Here is a side shot Masao. It's of the latest renovation.
Be careful of your choice of colors. The last renovation has the ship almost green. It's supposed to be the color of the ship before the harsh lights of the 60's film industry washed it out to the color it appears on screen.
The plastic modelers have their own theory. Basically a sample of the overspray was taken in and matched to a color called Sears Weatherbeater Stoneyhurst gray. I've also read that it's a close match for some gray that GM used on it's cars at the time. So its pretty much a crapshoot.
Alan E's plans are outstanding but even they have some inconsistancies when compared with all the photos available on the ship. I think I have managed to find about 300 diffenent shots now.
Any way just a few tidbits of info.
Did the Lt Cmdr like the pic of the Bataan? [ April 24, 2002, 20:08: Message edited by: Anduril ]
|
Masao
Member # 232
|
posted
Hey, Jay! The LCDR liked the render of Bataan very much. Thanks again.
The base color I used was matched to the paint chips in the CultTVman article. It's similar to the grey suggested by McCullar's (the IDIC page guy) article in ST Communicator. Both are slightly green. The color recommendations in both articles are based on samples of the paint (overspray on schematics) and the recollection of Richard Datin (spelling?), one the builders. He also debunks the use of the GM paint.
Thanks for that picture. It'll help with the window placement. But I really hate Mirecki's "renovation." He made Enterprise look like a rusted-out garbage scow! I hope they repaint Enterprise soon.
|
Harry
Member # 265
|
posted
What's the RGB value (or CMYK value) of the color you use, Masao?
|
Anduril
Member # 654
|
posted
I know I cringe everytime I go into the folder with the various photos from people who've shot the latest renovation.
Good grief Is all I can say.
I use those pics for windows and the other more permanent detail like that. I used the term renovation since there is no way I'd refer to that as a restoration.... [ April 25, 2002, 03:44: Message edited by: Anduril ]
|
CaptainMike
Member # 709
|
posted
yes, the burn mark at the base of the pylons almost makes me cry
|
MinutiaeMan
Member # 444
|
posted
Burn marks? Why, oh why???
*sigh*
None of the TNG ships were ever that old, or looked that crappy...
|
Masao
Member # 232
|
posted
The color I use RGB 176 191 189 and CMYK 20 9 14 0. The color was originally worked out by 3-D modeler Thomas7g, but the shade I use is slightly lighter than the one he suggested since the color looked to dark on the white backgrounds I always use.
|