T O P I C ��� R E V I E W
|
The Mighty Monkey of Mim
Member # 646
|
posted
And here, ladies and gents, is the best of the bunch!
NOTE: There are some minor Nemesis spoilers in the very last column of the last paragraph on the second page, and an even more minor one in the last sentence inside the box entitled "Romulan BIRD-OF-PREY: 2152" on the third page. So, as long as you gloss over those little bits, you shouldn't have any problem.
http://www.cdeath.net/monkeyofmim/BoP1.jpg http://www.cdeath.net/monkeyofmim/BoP2.jpg http://www.cdeath.net/monkeyofmim/BoP3.jpg http://www.cdeath.net/monkeyofmim/BoP4.jpg http://www.cdeath.net/monkeyofmim/BoP5.jpg http://www.cdeath.net/monkeyofmim/BoP6.jpg http://www.cdeath.net/monkeyofmim/BoP7a.jpg http://www.cdeath.net/monkeyofmim/BoP7b.jpg (Once again, my scanner bed isn't QUITE big enough to accomodate the whole page and still overlap enough for prospective photoshopping---which I do indeed hope will occur if someone is willing---and so I had to do this twice.)
[from the February 2003 issue of Star Trek: The Magazine, pp. 74-81]
For some reason, this CGI model looks really...well...real to me. I'm not sure whether it shows as well in the scans, but every time I glance at the mag pages I could swear for an instant that it's a physical model!
Enjoy!
-MMoM [ January 01, 2003, 13:41: Message edited by: The Mighty Monkey of Mim ]
|
Sol System
Member # 30
|
posted
"You'll know it's a Romulan ship by [the bird painted on it]"
Boo! As I recall, the episode seemed to go out of its way not to show the undersides of the ships. At the time I thought "Aha! They are waiting to reveal that feature in some dramatic shot in the future."
|
AndrewR
Member # 44
|
posted
Ahhhhhhh could have warned us there were spoilers for Nemesis in the text!! Gah.
We don't get to see the bloody movie until February now.
|
TheF0rce
Member # 533
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by AndrewR: Ahhhhhhh could have warned us there were spoilers for Nemesis in the text!! Gah.
We don't get to see the bloody movie until February now.
You were reading the text?
But...but...but...there were pretty pictures to be glued to.
|
Matrix
Member # 376
|
posted
I have to admit, it's a beautiful ship. But it seems to much of a 24th century ship design than 22nd.
|
The Mighty Monkey of Mim
Member # 646
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by AndrewR: Ahhhhhhh could have warned us there were spoilers for Nemesis in the text!! Gah.
We don't get to see the bloody movie until February now.
God DAMN IT!
I was having a really bad time w/this yesterday. I forgot to mention that about the Sternbach article too.
Anyhow, there's nothing but the merest of plot details in the thing. (The name of the villian and what happens to him at the end of the film---which is hardly a big surprise in an action/adventure film.)
-MMoM
|
Bernd
Member # 6
|
posted
Thanks a lot for the pics, Mim! (and for the Klingon ones too)
|
Dax
Member # 191
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by AndrewR: We don't get to see the bloody movie until February now.
What?! Please tell me you're not serious.
Do we know how big these BoP are? Going by the windows, they seem to have a similar deck count to the TOS Bird so they might be about the same size.
Anyway, thanks for the pics, Mim. Most appreciated.
|
AndrewR
Member # 44
|
posted
Tis true Dax. Pushed from Jan 16th to Feb 6th.
You know that Romulan ship would have been a Beauty in TNG era. Why couldn't they have made it more clunky? We know, we know - CGI - easier to make curvey things look realistic.
|
Dax
Member # 191
|
posted
That sux! Thanks for the information though, Andrew.
Regarding the ENT BoP design, other than the overtly Jem'Hadarish nacelles, I really like it. It strikes me as the way the TOS BoP should have always been and, to be honest, I don't think it'd be good as a TNG era ship -- the Romulans had clearly moved on from that style by that time.
|
Bernd
Member # 6
|
posted
Here are the cleaned up scans (bottom of the page): http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/scans/romulans1.htm
|
Anduril
Member # 654
|
posted
The cgi they used for the pic of the TOS bop in that article is a nasty one. They didn't even bother with putting the plasma launcher on it.
Anyway in case anyone is interested I'm doing a lower poly version of the Ent BOP for use in the Bridge Commander game. As it sit's it is a bit over 2400 polies.
|
Sol System
Member # 30
|
posted
Yeah, that picture of the TOS ship was awful, 100% awful. Too bad it was a screenshot.
|
The Mighty Monkey of Mim
Member # 646
|
posted
I think he meant the one from the Sternbach article, which was a CGI pic. And it was a little...unflattering.
-MMoM
|
Bernd
Member # 6
|
posted
Maybe someone could slightly redesign the TOS BoP to have more surface detail. That would clean up the mess at least a little bit.
|
Anduril
Member # 654
|
posted
And mess with perfection?!
http://www.the-submatrix.co.uk/starfleet-command/GalacticFringe/post/bop.jpg
Yes I was refering to the cgi pic in the article. I'll stick with the "unflattering" description as kids may be reading.
I hope no one got paid for it however.
|
Matrix
Member # 376
|
posted
Yes, I agree. Though doing the same treatment to the Bird of Prey, like they did to the E-nil and D-7 in DS9 would be nice.
|
MinutiaeMan
Member # 444
|
posted
So, now that we've got reliable diagrams to get the ship's proportions, can anyone who's got a bit more of a practiced eye make some calculations on the pre-BOP's size?
I may be remembering wrong, but I seem to recall that the last shot with the pre-BOP behind the ship was after dialogue had said that it was closing to 500 meters -- which is basically 2 ship lengths for the NX-01.
Based on that, it looks like the pre-BOP might be approximately 1.5 times the length of the NX-01.
|
Matrix
Member # 376
|
posted
I always thought around 300 meters. So iguess that sounds right.
|
Dax
Member # 191
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by MinutiaeMan: So, now that we've got reliable diagrams to get the ship's proportions, can anyone who's got a bit more of a practiced eye make some calculations on the pre-BOP's size?
I've done a bit of a structural analysis and I've come to ~200m as the length of the ENT BoP.
Does anyone here have contact with Eaves? He'd be the one to get a definitive design size from.
|
Anduril
Member # 654
|
posted
I would definately like that 200 meter measurement better.
|
The Mighty Monkey of Mim
Member # 646
|
posted
Why so much bigger than the TOS version? (68m according to the Starship Spotter and 131m according to Bernd.)
|
MrNeutron
Member # 524
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Matrix: I always thought around 300 meters. So iguess that sounds right.
300 meters would make it bigger than the TOS BoP for sure.
|
Dax
Member # 191
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim: Why so much bigger than the TOS version? (68m according to the Starship Spotter and 131m according to Bernd.)
I pretty much agree with Bernd on the size of the TOS BoP (140m according to my measurements of the Encyclopedia charts) and, at 200m, the main body of the ENT BoP would be the same size. Notice how the nacelles are much longer and the pylons swing further fwd on the ENT Bird -- the result being an overall longer ship, yet the volume would be almost the same.
|