This is topic Unknown ship in forum Designs, Artwork, & Creativity at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/7/377.html

Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
here is a ship I did.

Andrew.

------------------
"Who wouldn't be the one you love
Who wouldn't stand inside your love." - Stand Inside Your Love, The Smashing Pumpkins
 


Posted by Fabrux (Member # 71) on :
 
Ooh! Very nice..

------------------
Ross: "Inter arma, enim silent leges."
Bashir: "'In the time of war the law falls silent.' Cicero. Have we become a 24th-century Rome, driven by the fact that Caesar can do no wrong?!"
-Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges


 


Posted by Michael Dracon (Member # 4) on :
 
WOW!! Looks great!

Got a top view??

------------------
E-mail Dot at: [email protected]

(-=\V/=-)
 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
Thankyou, I did it last night - in fact I did two over the weekend - but I guess a little more time would produce a little more detail...

there is no top view at the moment - but I'll try.

Andrew

------------------
"Who wouldn't be the one you love
Who wouldn't stand inside your love." - Stand Inside Your Love, The Smashing Pumpkins
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Which end's the front? I'm guessing the right...?

------------------
Jackson: "Basically, he was the original Satan."
O'Neill: "Well, isn't that special?"
-Stargate SG-1: "Serpent's Song"
 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
yes the right - I was waiting for that question - cause it looks like it could go the other way eh?

I want to know how RW does his ships!!!!!!!!

------------------
"Who wouldn't be the one you love
Who wouldn't stand inside your love." - Stand Inside Your Love, The Smashing Pumpkins
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Very well, I'd say. :-)

------------------
Jackson: "Basically, he was the original Satan."
O'Neill: "Well, isn't that special?"
-Stargate SG-1: "Serpent's Song"
 


Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :
 
The nacelles could be a little bigger. You know, for the aesthetics(?) of it.

------------------
-At least I can get it up without biomechanical pumps.

-Try falling into a pit of lava, Moffy. Then see how horny you feel.

[This message has been edited by Nimrod (edited February 29, 2000).]
 


Posted by Bernd (Member # 6) on :
 
That's really interesting. A future design, I suppose. 25th century?

------------------
"A few more calculations"


 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
Well, I don't think the nacelles have to been any bigger - cause the aft section isn't very 'big' - i.e. not that wide... its not a 'deep' ship - and they're comparitively the same nacelle:hull ratio that the Galaxy nacelles are... but not as bad as the Intrepid - nor as over done as the Sovereign...

oh you said aesthetically speaking

well - the 'rear' of the nacelle - isn't rounded - that hull plate part above the grill is - a 'spine' - i.e. not entirely covering the superior surface of the nacelle - there is also (possibly) aux impulse engines and RCS thrusters...

sorta like this:

from above:

|-----------------\
|======connecting==|
|==========spine===|
|-----------------/
aft forward

------------------
"Who wouldn't be the one you love
Who wouldn't stand inside your love." - Stand Inside Your Love, The Smashing Pumpkins
 


Posted by Laz1701 on :
 
Very cool. Nice to see something that looks this good and isn't a kitbash. And it certainly does look like something from the 25th Century or beyond. Looks better than the Relativity.

------------------
The Starship Encyclopedia
 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
I have another ship that I did before this one - its in the same vein... I'll post it when I get home this evening... I also have it separated too...

Andrew

------------------
"Who wouldn't be the one you love
Who wouldn't stand inside your love." - Stand Inside Your Love, The Smashing Pumpkins
 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3