T O P I C ��� R E V I E W
|
AndrewR
Member # 44
|
posted
here is a ship I did.Andrew. 
------------------ "Who wouldn't be the one you love Who wouldn't stand inside your love." - Stand Inside Your Love, The Smashing Pumpkins
|
Fabrux
Member # 71
|
posted
Ooh! Very nice..------------------ Ross: "Inter arma, enim silent leges." Bashir: "'In the time of war the law falls silent.' Cicero. Have we become a 24th-century Rome, driven by the fact that Caesar can do no wrong?!" -Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges
|
Michael Dracon
Member # 4
|
posted
WOW!! Looks great!Got a top view?? ------------------ E-mail Dot at: Dot@DotAt.at (-=\V/=-)
|
AndrewR
Member # 44
|
posted
Thankyou, I did it last night - in fact I did two over the weekend - but I guess a little more time would produce a little more detail...there is no top view at the moment - but I'll try. Andrew ------------------ "Who wouldn't be the one you love Who wouldn't stand inside your love." - Stand Inside Your Love, The Smashing Pumpkins
|
TSN
Member # 31
|
posted
Which end's the front? I'm guessing the right...?------------------ Jackson: "Basically, he was the original Satan." O'Neill: "Well, isn't that special?" -Stargate SG-1: "Serpent's Song"
|
AndrewR
Member # 44
|
posted
yes the right - I was waiting for that question - cause it looks like it could go the other way eh?I want to know how RW does his ships!!!!!!!! ------------------ "Who wouldn't be the one you love Who wouldn't stand inside your love." - Stand Inside Your Love, The Smashing Pumpkins
|
TSN
Member # 31
|
posted
Very well, I'd say. :-)------------------ Jackson: "Basically, he was the original Satan." O'Neill: "Well, isn't that special?" -Stargate SG-1: "Serpent's Song"
|
Nim
Member # 205
|
posted
The nacelles could be a little bigger. You know, for the aesthetics(?) of it.  ------------------ -At least I can get it up without biomechanical pumps. -Try falling into a pit of lava, Moffy. Then see how horny you feel. [This message has been edited by Nimrod (edited February 29, 2000).]
|
Bernd
Member # 6
|
posted
That's really interesting. A future design, I suppose. 25th century?------------------ "A few more calculations"
|
AndrewR
Member # 44
|
posted
Well, I don't think the nacelles have to been any bigger - cause the aft section isn't very 'big' - i.e. not that wide... its not a 'deep' ship - and they're comparitively the same nacelle:hull ratio that the Galaxy nacelles are... but not as bad as the Intrepid - nor as over done as the Sovereign...oh you said aesthetically speaking  well - the 'rear' of the nacelle - isn't rounded - that hull plate part above the grill is - a 'spine' - i.e. not entirely covering the superior surface of the nacelle - there is also (possibly) aux impulse engines and RCS thrusters... sorta like this: from above: |-----------------\ |======connecting==| |==========spine===| |-----------------/ aft forward ------------------ "Who wouldn't be the one you love Who wouldn't stand inside your love." - Stand Inside Your Love, The Smashing Pumpkins
|
Laz1701
|
posted
Very cool. Nice to see something that looks this good and isn't a kitbash. And it certainly does look like something from the 25th Century or beyond. Looks better than the Relativity.------------------ The Starship Encyclopedia
|
AndrewR
Member # 44
|
posted
I have another ship that I did before this one - its in the same vein... I'll post it when I get home this evening... I also have it separated too...Andrew ------------------ "Who wouldn't be the one you love Who wouldn't stand inside your love." - Stand Inside Your Love, The Smashing Pumpkins
|