T O P I C ��� R E V I E W
|
Ed / BWC
Member # 818
|
posted
Continuation of the God Forskaen Ship thread, if you havent read it, do it before you read this: God Forsaken Ship Thread
Ok, here it is:
(I'll try to clean it up later.)
|
Nim Pim
Member # 205
|
posted
Cook Class.
And today we shall begin with...omelet! Many people think one should use milk with the eggs instead of water, this is wrong.
|
Shik
Member # 343
|
posted
It's an actioning, not a descriptor, Mr. Odd Biblical Hunter Person Who's From An Icy Land Of Cheese And Topheavy 17th-Century Warships But Is Not Populated By Advanced Cybernetic Organisms no Matter What The Directors of Volvo Might Say.
Oh yeah. Hey, Studly Duct Tape Lad. Why didn't you just throw this in the other thread where there was a little thing we like to call continuity?
"THINK before you ask these questions, Mitch. Pff....twenty points higher than me & he thinks a big guy like that can wear his clothes?" [ July 07, 2002, 13:30: Message edited by: Shik ]
|
The_Tom
Member # 38
|
posted
Bork!
|
Ed / BWC
Member # 818
|
posted
...named after famous sea guy James Cook.
So how do you like it?
|
Shik
Member # 343
|
posted
"Famous sea guy." Hahahahahahaha...
Oh, wwait. That's not funny. That's sad. Commence emo mode.
|
Cartman
Member # 256
|
posted
I think your Cook should've stayed in Class longer. The ingredients are there, but... it just doesn't taste right. You know?
|
Ed / BWC
Member # 818
|
posted
Here is a revision and a variant .
Variant:
(Cant seem to get past that speckled thing on the nacelles. Grr...)
|
Ed / BWC
Member # 818
|
posted
Here is the ship revision with phaser strips and difrent stuff added:
(AARRGGg!!!!! WHY CAN I NOT GET PAST THAT ON THE NACELLES!!!! )
|
Lobo
Member # 669
|
posted
The ship looks really good so far but PLEASE its "Over Phasered"
Lobo
|
Ed / BWC
Member # 818
|
posted
Well, it's mostly because I'm using phaser strips instead of rings, but I'm kinda thinking it could lose some itself. Which ones should I lose?
|
Siegfried
Member # 29
|
posted
I say nix the phaser strips that are on the neck, on the forward part of the secondary hull, and on the nacelles.
The firing range of the neck's phaser array is already being covered by the forward saucer arrays. Same reason for the forward secondary hull strips: the saucer arrays already make up for it. As for the nacelles, I'm just a fan of putting weapons systems on your engines. The remaining phasers I think are fine; and I think the ship overall looks pretty good.
As for the speckling of the nacelle, it's just one of those things with converting .bmp files to .gif files in Paint. Try using a different shade of gray, that ought to help.
|
Topher
Member # 71
|
posted
Nacelles. Neck. Sides of stardrive. Like this...

I added a little touch of my own. ![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif) [ July 08, 2002, 21:43: Message edited by: Topher ]
|
Ed / BWC
Member # 818
|
posted
I kept the one on the neck, becuase it might be useful during saucer seperation. (What? You thought it didn't have it? I'm suprised!)
Oh, Topher, you can't put the Starfleet marking there. It's the sensor pallet.
|
Lobo
Member # 669
|
posted
Ahhh excelent ship and now other views please.
|
Topher
Member # 71
|
posted
Ahh, I see what you're doing there. Cool.
|
Ed / BWC
Member # 818
|
posted
I might be delayed on the other views because this guy over at SCN wants me to design starships for his RPG, but I'll probably have the front tonight sometime.
And if your wondering about the sensor pallets, this is like a step between the Enterprise B and the Enterprise C.
(Did I already say that? It seems like I did...)
|
Ed / BWC
Member # 818
|
posted
Front view:
|
Ed / BWC
Member # 818
|
posted
Fixed front view.
|
Bernd
Member # 6
|
posted
You may consider pulling the nacelles closer to the hull. Otherwise, nice work.
|