I am currently working on the side view of the ship. I made 2 vers. (just with little difference in the neck)
Actually I refit the most of the ships cause I discovered that some of them look pretty ugly ^^
Have a nice day Lobo
Posted by Dat (Member # 302) on :
Doesn't this belong in the Designs forum?
Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
Yup. (Also, that's a nice ship, I say!)
Timo Saloniemi
Posted by Lobo (Member # 669) on :
Oh f*** yes of course... sorry i was in a hurry...so i cought the wrong sub forum...sorry
Posted by Jason Abbadon (Member # 882) on :
Are those grey strips alonf the secondary hull intended to be phasers? I like them as phasers!
The phaser strips on the pylons and saucer seem a bit thin considering the ship's size- thinner than on the Sovvie even.
Posted by Lobo (Member # 669) on :
Eh no that are sensor arrays ^^ yes i have chosen a to small line size of the phaser stripes
Lobo
Posted by Kobi (Member # 1360) on :
I presume this ship shall represent the original proposed design for the Ent-D which later was used to represent Ent-C on the lounge display, but was not used as Ambassador class?
Anyway... good art!
Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
Dem good. Dem good, I say!
Posted by Guardian 2000 (Member # 743) on :
I just spent five minutes trying to figure out what the difference in the neck was. Man, you're picky. ;-)
I quite like the vessel, and agree that the new version is nicer-looking. The old version was basically the same, but the contrast between details was too high.
From a technological standpoint, though, the missing lifeboats on the underside of the secondary hull could be a bad thing. Just a thought.
Posted by Bernd (Member # 6) on :
That's a significant improvement of a design that was already great. I don't think the phaser strips are too thin. They may just not be as much raised as on the Sovereign class or Intrepid.
