Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Community » Officers' Lounge » The Discovery of Administratium (Ad)

   
Author Topic: The Discovery of Administratium (Ad)
BlueElectron
Active Member
Member # 281

 - posted      Profile for BlueElectron     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Investigators at a major research institute have discovered the heaviest element known to science. This startling new discovery has been tentatively named Administratium (Ad).

The new element has no protons or electrons, thus having an atomic number of 0. It does, however, have one neutron, 125 assistant neutrons, 75 vice neutrons, and 111 assistant vice neutrons, for an atomic mass of 312. These 312 particles are held together by a force
called morons, which are surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called peons.

Since it has no electrons, Administratium is inert. However, it can be detected as it impedes every other reaction with which it comes into contact. According to the discoverers, a minute amount of Administratium can cause a reaction that would normally take less than
a second to take over four days to complete.

Administratium has a normal half-life of approximately three years. It does not actually decay, but instead undergoes a reorganization in which a portion of the assistant neutrons, vice neutrons, and assistant vice neutrons exchange places.

In fact, an Administratium sample's mass will actually increase over time, since with each reorganization some of the morons inevitably become neutrons, forming new isotopes. This characteristic of moron promotion leads some scientists to speculate that Administratium is
formed whenever morons reach a certain concentration within the medium. This hypothetical quantity is referred to as the "Critical Morass".

------------------
If a diamond is a woman's best friend, why does a man has to settle for a dog?


Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged
Saiyanman Benjita
...in 2012. This time, why not the worst?
Member # 122

 - posted      Profile for Saiyanman Benjita     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
So you decided to put it in the OL. Wonder why it's getting bigger? could it be because you're spreading it?

------------------
Look at the past few years:
Jimmy Carter: Who we kidding, Valium Posterchild. We go to:
Ronald Reagan, Howdy Doody Sr. If it keeps getting benign, we might end up with:
Mr. Rogers, "Can you say Armageddon? Oops, too late." Or we can get macho and have:
Jack Nicholson vs. Clint Eastwood, Shortest debate in history, all Jack will have to say is "How can you debate me, you haven't opened your goddammed eyes in twenty years."


Registered: Apr 1999  |  IP: Logged
BlueElectron
Active Member
Member # 281

 - posted      Profile for BlueElectron     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Is the tread seriously getting bigger??

hmmm.....I wonder why.....

------------------
If a diamond is a woman's best friend, why does a man has to settle for a dog?


Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3