This is topic A Testimony in forum The Flameboard at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/11/452.html

Posted by bryce (Member # 42) on :
 
I am placing this in the Lounge because I do not expect any debate on it. I probably won't even check this any time soon, and if anyone wants to attack me I do not care. I just want all who see this to read it. It may seem unreal to some of you, but I pray you will at least ponder my Saturday night.

Saturday 4/8/2000

I went to Dr. Neff's house tonight and felt that I was to prayed over there. Dr. Neff holds a prayer meeting in his basement every Saturday night during the school year. We prayed to start off as always and worshipped through song as always. Dr. Neff said God told him there was one there that needed to be prayed over who had a chronic illness. I raised my hand and said that earlier I felt I should be prayed over and I told everyone my three illnesses: Allergies, Asthma, and Cerebral Palsy. Everyone immediately agreed that it was me who should be prayed for. I stood up at this point and the entire crowd there prayed over and laid hands over me. Dr. Neff anointed me with a lot of oil and we began to pray. Dr. Neff shook immediately, many people were praying in tongues, and I felt the people on my right vibrating. I could feel a tingle over my entire body as people touched my voice box, my back, the back of my head, and my eyes and nose. They prayed over all this and more, even the nerves in my body and the Central Nervous System. We must have been praying for half an hour and I felt that same tingling in my body for a long time after we were done praying specifically for me. My hands now appear to be the same size and I actually feel taller! I feel taller because my right leg has always been shorter than my left and if God has healed that then I would be taller (I had a limp). My eyes no longer itch and I feel like I never have before.
My right foot is tingling but it is still crooked; yet, that is not a real problem in any way I can think of right now. Regardless of that, I physically feel better than I ever have. Of course, I will have to see a Doctor to see if any physical transformation has taken place. I tell you that my foot is still crooked to help you believe I am not lying to you. Whether any transformation has taken place or not is not the point. When I completely allowed God in my life a few years back He made me content with who I am and He told me that He will use me no matter what. My "life" verse is Exo. 4:12: God told Moses he would help him to speak and teach him what to say. I praise God I have never asked to have my own personal "Aaron" come to speak for me. Even if God has done nothing permanent tonight, just the sheer feeling of his presence and love is more than enough for me to write this and praise His name for�just being who He is!
When I was younger, I did not believe in this kind of healing, but I have seen so much of it this year at school that to doubt it exists is impossible. A lot of people don't believe in it either, but I pray that through this account of my evening all may come to believe in it. For anyone who does not believe in Jesus Christ, I pray this will make you reconsider His existence. He is out there, He is good and He can change your life. He knows what is best for you. I promise this to you, if He is allowed to enter your heart He will eventually make you content with all that you are and all that you have.

In His Love,
Michael J. Peters

------------------
We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the
obvious is the first duty of intelligent men."
George Orwell
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
*sigh* I'm not even going to comment on this. If I said what I was thinking right now, I'd offend enough people to make it too much of a hassle to try to make any logical arguement. Let's just say that I wish for the exact opposite of what you say you hope for.

------------------
"This ship will not survive the formation of the cosmos..."
-B'Elanna Torres, VOY: "Death Wish"
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
I'm beginning to think we should do what the Straight Dope forums do, and add a section for witnessing.

Having said that, you obviously want some sort of debate, else why post?

I truly and sincerely hope you find the miracle cure you're looking for. However, you've made a causal connection between prayer and feeling better without any evidence of that connection.

------------------
"What did it mean to fly? A tremor in your soul. To resist the dull insistance of gravity."
--
Camper Van Beethoven

 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
Hey, look! I can talk in tongues, too! "Anooka weeka wa naga naga del der an tagad bo iuuto bosh! Toron go bosh!"

Criminetly, people.

Yeh, I hope you find your miracle cure too. But i'd not wager a penny on it.

You want to hear about MY weekend? Call this an 'antiwitnessing,' perhaps?

Friday my girlfriend's sister took her to the hospital. She'd been ill for a week, and had suddenly gotten worse.

Now, it should be noted that my girlfriend has a long history of illness, as she not only had to have major surgery to remove sideways cervical (no relation to cervix) ribs that were slowly killing her, but sufferes from constant excruciating migraines, interstitial cystitis (a disease so painful that 20% of its victims attempt suicide), and was severely abused as a child, leading to her needing to have a total hysterectomy, and having post-traumatic stress disorder and panic attacks.

She's also allergic to most forms of pain medication, the exceptions unfortunately being a few unpleasantly narcotic medicines (such as demerol), with reactions ranging from painful to life-threatening.

So anyway, the ER doctor gave her a spinal tap, which anyone whose had one can tel you is not at all pleasant, because he thought she might have meningitis (Uniontown doctors aren't known for their competence.) He categorically refused to treat her with medicine we knew would work. Instead, he gave her something untested, and promptly sent her home.

(I will here remark that this same doctor "treated" my gf's other sister's two girls after they were in a car accident, and not only missed a broken bone and a shard of glass in one, but yelled at the 14-year old because she couldn't read an eye chart -- no wonder, with both eyes swollen nearly shut -- and yelled at the 10-year-old for 'getting off her back board' -- which she had been strapped to and couldn't possiblt have freed herself from without a paamedic.)

Needless to say, the 'treatment' was not effective, and she was back in the hospital 12 hours later... and then again, 8 hours after that. This third time, we ran into the same doctor. By now she was not only completely sick, vomiting and worse, but in the middle of a full-blown panic episode. Our young doctor 'friend' decided she was an addict in withdrawal (FYI, having known the woman for two-and a half years, I can unequivocally state that this is not the case.) And would not treat her with ANYTHING.

Luckily, our demands for another doctor were met, and we got her some treatment... but the damage was done.

Sunday she had an 'episode' which involved a near-regression to childhood, and a withdrawal from reality into somewhere she would be 'safe.' _I_ had to 'go in' and bring her out of this, something which required me to take myself to places of my own that I swore I'd never visit again... but I brought her out... with some fumbling help from her sisters.

And just when I thought we were past the darkness... her sister calls me at 10 last night and asks if I could please come over and help. So I did, being who I am. This caused unbelievable strife with my parents, who, not knowing the full situation nor really being willing to try, believe she's manipulating me with her illness. It also didn't help that I had to go to work this morning, and sitting up all night in a strange house on an uncomfortable fold-away bed wasn't going to help any... but I went.
And she (and I) finally realized I can't take care of her ALL the time. Which nearly caused its own meltdown all over again.

So here I am. Tired, beat, and through Hell in four short days. I could give tours.

And not a single word of encouragement from 'above.'

so *Thpbthbpthbpthbpth!* :P

------------------
"Nobody knows this, but I'm scared all the time... of what I might do, if I ever let go." -- Michael Garibaldi



 


Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
*Beats head against table*

I would like to say at this point that if there was anyone who I could give a reincarnation pill to, to let them lead a normal, relatively stress and trouble free life, it would be First of Two. He's one of those rare people who says that he's lived through hell, and, amazingly, he actually has. If I were older, and richer, and had some balls, I'd invite him to come live with me for a year, in a non-gay way, so that we could talk and hang and drink and laugh and watch TV and have nothing depressing happen to us apart from maybe missing Buffy. (Don't worry, I'll be screaming at him again by next week).

Okay, next point: They were looking for someone who had a chronic illness. And allergies and asthma count as that do they? Not to be harsh, (and ignoring the fact that asthma is one of the biggest placebo diseases there is. Sure people do suffer from it, but about half the people who have a pumb have it because 1/ The doctor wanted a quite life, or 2/ Their parents are hypocondriacs, or 3/ They are hypocondiriacs, or 4/ They forgot their PE kit and didn't want to do the run in the rain.) but isn't asthma a kind of allergy? And what exactly do you mean by "allergy"? I have hay fever. It's not going to make me want to have strangers run their hands over me and shout gibberish at me.

The cerebral palsey is a bit more serious though. Still, I''ve known a couple of people who've got it. It's hardly in the same catagory as beign blind, or being complety confined to a wheelchair is it?

Also, if this happened to me, the FIRST thing I'd do is go and get some proof. Which maybe why I don't hang around dubious guys who like shouting gibberish at strangers, but anyway, how hard would it have been to check, eh? Five minutes with a tape measure.

But you say that the physical transformation is not the point. Well then, what is? If it's that you feel better, then bully for you. Still, it's not anything that a good psychiatrist, or ten minutes down the pub with your mates, or some good old fashioned opium couldn't have done.


I had more points, but having retyped this after a power-cut, I've reconsidered typing them. Still (and this is more out of curiosity than anything), I thought only God got the Him treatment. I thought Jesus got a small "h".

------------------
"Sometimes I wish the planet would be scoured with cleansing fire. Other times I just wish Frank would be."
Sol System
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Liam: Well, if you believe the Christians, they're the same guy...

------------------
"Compared to you, every male on this ship is an expert on women!"
-Geordi LaForge to Wesley Crusher, TNG: "Sarek"
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Mind you, t'would be nice if we could keep the Christian bashing to a bare minimum. Not that I think there really has been any, but I would like to see us have a reasonable discussion and not have to consign it to the flames, as it were.

------------------
"What did it mean to fly? A tremor in your soul. To resist the dull insistance of gravity."
--
Camper Van Beethoven

[This message has been edited by Sol System (edited April 12, 2000).]
 


Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
I am a Christian. And they're not so much the same guy, as different parts of the same being.

Jesus talks to God in the Bible, and unless he's somehow related to Bruce Banner, I doubt it's a sign of MPD.

And in the bible, I'm pretty sure Jesus doesn't get a capital 'h'.

------------------
"Sometimes I wish the planet would be scoured with cleansing fire. Other times I just wish Frank would be."
Sol System

 


Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
But, to expand on what Sol said, let's also be aware of definitions. Christian = belief in God, Jesus and Holy Spirit. Christian does not equal belief in present day miracle healing, people shouting gibberish at you while holding your voice-box, or belief in con-artists who claim to be emmisary's from God who happen to hold suspicious doctorates.

------------------
"Sometimes I wish the planet would be scoured with cleansing fire. Other times I just wish Frank would be."
Sol System

 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
Thanks, but I'd pass on the reincarnation pill to Julie, for obvious reasons.

I'd also take a tape recorder to any 'speaking in tongues' sessions, then try and find a linguist who can analize it and describe the language.

Since most people have never HEARD any ancient tongues, convincing gibberish isn't hard to manufacture... Okrand did it for the Klingons, after all...

------------------
"Nobody knows this, but I'm scared all the time... of what I might do, if I ever let go." -- Michael Garibaldi



 


Posted by Baloo (Member # 5) on :
 
Occasionally I have spoken in tongues. In my case, the spelling would (especially recently) be rendered "AAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrggggghhhhhhhh!!!!"

Some speaking in tongues is intended to be translated by others. If you know for a fact that person A does not have a working knowledge of language B, yet you hear person A speak in language B (which you do know), this is evidence (though not necessarily proof) that something out of the ordinary is occurring.

I was also, for a time, a member of a Charismatic church. A Charismatic church is kind of like the Pentecostals (though I'm not precisely sure what the difference is) or like the holy rollers (without the rolling ). One way tongues was used would be for one person to pray in tongues. Then another person would receive the translation. These were generally prophetic or instructional (generally the latter) exhortations, given by the holy spirit. It's been a while since I attended that church (over 20 years), so I can't recite any specific examples.

Another way tongues is expressed is in private prayer. What happens when I pray that way is that I just utter nonsense syllables (privately, of course -- I understand it would definitely give someone an inaccurate impression -- I'm weird, just not the way that this would imply ). I figure that God knows what my problems are and what I need -- let Him sort it out. When you were an infant (before you could speak) and had needs, you would cry out to your mother -- she probably had a pretty good idea what your problem was. That's pretty much how that form of tongues works.

As far as the rest of the above is concerned, bryce had something interesting and exciting happen to him, of a religious nature, and he wanted to share this experience with his friends. If he'd been a native American telling about his vision quest, you would have asked questions and listened respectfully, if not credulously, or possibbly ignored this thread. As it turns out, he practices a religion you perceive as being filled with charlatans and their idiot-child followers, so you heckle him and call him three kinds of idiot.

Infinite diversity in infinite combination? Well, maybe, but not if you're a Christian. Had he been telling you all how much better he was than the rest of you because of his experience, I'dve been in the front row throwing overripe tomatoes. As it stands, I'm a bit disgusted.

--Baloo

------------------
"Just because you know you're right doesn't mean you are."
-- Me
http://www.geocities.com/cyrano_jones.geo/


[This message has been edited by Baloo (edited April 12, 2000).]
 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Horxnan dishobi lic jerata!

I assume First of Two's segment is nonsense, and it's too small a sample anyway, but it's fun to look at.

"Anooka weeka wa naga naga del der an tagad bo iuuto bosh! Toron go bosh!"

The use of "bosh" in both sentences would probably indicate that it's a noun/pronoun, or perhaps a verb. I'm guessing noun/pronoun because the sentences probably describe related action, being paired up, but that needn't be the case.

The repetition of "naga" might be for emphasis.

-a might be a case ending, because of the string of words ending in it. Maybe one of the words is a noun and the other are modifying adjectives. For example, "Anooka" could be the noun, with the adjectives following it, if "naga naga" indicates an adjective or adverb empasized (like "really really" etc.)

If I'm right about the pronoun thing and the case ending thing, the verb lies somewhere in "del der an tagad bo iuuto." Likewise, the verb of the second sentence could be in "toron go." There's a parallel here, with "tagad bo" and "toron go." The -o words might be tense particles, with the other words the verbs. Maybe the tagading happened in the past, and the toroning is happening now, or something like that.

That leaves "del der an" and "iuuto" in the first sentence. Those could be more adverbs, or a prepositional phrase, etc.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"It's easy to learn to drive a golf cart, but it's hard to express yourself in one." - Larry Wall

[This message has been edited by The Shadow (edited April 12, 2000).]
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Oh, I'm not singling out Christians. That just happened to be the specific example needed, given the reference to Jesus. I consider all religions to be equally illogical. If a Native American were in here babbling about some "vision", I'd regard it in exactly the same light as the first post of this thread.

------------------
"Compared to you, every male on this ship is an expert on women!"
-Geordi LaForge to Wesley Crusher, TNG: "Sarek"
 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
Precisely. One hallucination, whether its brought about by fasting, happy 'shrooms, prayerful intent, or just wishful thinking, is pretty much the same as another.

Same goes for NDE's, Alien-got-me stories, other 'faith healing' instances, et cetera. Until some old guy with a scraggly beard grabs my hand and restores my left middle finger to 100% working order, I will treat these things as I would any other non-credible flight of fancy.

Of course, my totem animal (according to my N.Am. religion-following friend) IS Coyote, so I could just be messing with your minds.

------------------
"Nobody knows this, but I'm scared all the time... of what I might do, if I ever let go." -- Michael Garibaldi



 


Posted by Baloo (Member # 5) on :
 
Niiiice doggy!

------------------
"Just because you know you're right doesn't mean you are."
-- Me
http://www.geocities.com/cyrano_jones.geo/



 


Posted by Jubilee (Member # 99) on :
 
Heehehhee.....

I find this to be very interesting, especially in the fact that you seem to think "miracle" healings happen in only one culture or one religion and are some sort of isolated event.

Well they're not.

As a matter of fact, it is proven that if you THINK YOU ARE GOING TO BE HEALED, YOU WILL BE. Why is this?.. the power of believing is the thing that specifies the "truth" as we know it. So there you have it. You went in, believed you were feeling things, believed you were being healed, and then you were.

This is not necessarily attributed to any sort of power of a higher being, namely your Christian God. As a matter of fact, i can quote many passages in the bible that state that God no longer has dealings with the body of man in that sort of context..... though miracles can sometimes occur it is more likely that your "miracle" can be summed up to the simple healing power of the mind.

As a matter of fact, this his how shamans and pagans have been healing people successfully for years.

so :-P

That's all i have to say about that.

Adios,
your Resident Witch

------------------
"You say don't fear your dreams, it's easier than it seems.
You say you'd never let me fall, from hopes so high.
But never is a promise, and you can't afford to lie." - Fiona Apple


 


Posted by The Talented Mr. Gurgeh (Member # 318) on :
 
Okay, I only spotted this little discussion recently and, being a cold, impassive, scientific atheist, I have to voice my opinion. Feel free to flame me.

Now, before I get condemn'd to th'fiery depths of Hell, I'd like to let everyone know that up until 5 years ago(I was 16), I was an extremely devout Catholic with a strong faith, due to my upbringing, in Dog, beg your pardon, in God. Science saved me from a lifetime of superstition, taboo, and religion. It pains me to see people like bryce led to believe in such nonsense.

------------------
Try not.
Do.
Or Do not.
There is no try.

[This message has been edited by Gurgeh (edited April 15, 2000).]
 


Posted by Vacuum robot lady from Spaceballs (Member # 239) on :
 
How nice of you to voice your opinion and back it up with evidence/and or facts. (Or at least a reason, and not blind rhetoric)

Saying "God Does Not Exist" in an argument about religion carries the same weight as this guy's "Testimony". It's not going to enlighten people one bit, and you come off as an agressive, opinionated ass-head (No offense) who is no less stubborn than Jack Van Impish and other religious zealots.

Religion is a personal choice. We all make the decision in what to believe in ourselves, based on what we need, what we desire, and evidence placed before us.

Trying to combat an argument about the existance of Miracles by saying Religion is brainwashing and that miracles are bullshit, well, you are entitled to your opinion, but try to actually argue the points next time.

------------------
"I have never let my schooling interfere with my education."
-Mark Twain
 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
What UM said.

I mean really, people who argue without any basis in data and logic, just chiming in, are fine, except that they'll never get taken seriously. And they make the rest of us honest skeptics look bad.

Now, the fact that you're coming to us in this manner, having come out of Catholicism isn't entirely surprising to me, as most of the people I know who were raised Cath. and then left it remain very angry at the church. Apparently, they weren't always treated in a civilized manner. Never having been a Catholic, I can't really comment in detail on the lifestyle.

I myself, was baptized a Methodist, mostly to please my grandmother, and I went to church, though the more I think on it the more I understand that my upbringing leaned toward the agnostic side, and my "faith" was never really indoctrinated. It was much easier for me to leave, when the time finally came. I don't hold much ill will towards my old church, except about the petty politicking and the harshness of a few stupid old people.

Now if you want to go after the validity of "faith healing," really the first thing to do would be to challenge someone to have it done in a clinical setting, with a full battery of tests before and after each session, to show any results. (Amazingly, *wink* no faith healer I know of has ever done this.)

Or compare it to Voodoo. It's been demonstrated that if someone BELIEVES in Voodoo strongly enough, and then is 'cursed' they'll get sick, perhaps even die. As Jubes said, the human brain is a remarkable machine, and it's capable of a lot more control over the body than it's given credit for. Ask some of those Yoga types who can stuff themselves into body, or attain such mastery of control over pain that they can stick sharp objects in themselves without significant harm.

------------------
"Nobody knows this, but I'm scared all the time... of what I might do, if I ever let go." -- Michael Garibaldi



 


Posted by Baloo (Member # 5) on :
 
Still, symptom relief is valid as long as it does not harm others. My right to take ibuprophin ends where your pocket begins, as it were.

My grandmother (dad's mom) was a very religious woman, sanctimonious without wanting to seem so -- she was a really nice lady in serious denial. She had been a dyed-in-the-wool Southern Baptist all her life, and believed very fervently that all non-Baptists were going straight to hell on greased rails (and she wasn't too sure about those other, non-Southern Baptists, either ).

When I was in my late teens, Grandma contracted a serious, untreatable abdominal difficulty involving tumors, loads of immobilizing pain, and probable death within a year. I think it was much more serious, but my folks were trying to shield me -- and that was what they thought was okay to tell me.

One of her "lost" (nondenominational) friends invited her to go to church with her. Grandma went with her because she liked her friend (she used to make a point about mentioning that she hoped her friend -- already a Christian -- would get "saved. I presume she meant her friend would see the error of her ways and become a Baptist, preferably Southern ). She was sitting in the back of the church, not paying particular attention to the sermon, when she felt a warm sensation -- almost like sitting in a warm shaft of sunlight. As the warmth seeped into her body, she felt the pain dissolving from her abdomen. By the end of the sermon, the pain was completely gone.

Grandma, skeptic that she was, did not tell anyone until she could get checked out by her doctor. He was amazed -- she had no sign of disease. Mind you, she was still diabetic and had to watch what she ate, but whatever had prompted the doctors to advise her to get her affairs in order right away was gone. More importantly, this formerly holier-than-thou, worry-wartish, judgemental woman we loved just because she was grandma (and not because she was particularly like Mary Poppins) became a warm, caring, accepting person. That transformation was more dramatic than her improvement in health, and if any miracle had occurred, it was the greater one.

Of course, the doctors could have simply misdiagnosed a non-lethal, temporary condition, but the change in her whole outlook on life and the way she dealt with other people was quite a different story.

Grandma attributed her healing to God giving her a second chance. I can provide no evidence to contradict her conclusion, and any attempt to provide a "rational" explaination for what happened would only be rationalization.

--Baloo

------------------
"Just because you know you're right doesn't mean you are."
-- Me
http://www.geocities.com/cyrano_jones.geo/



 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Can I go back to something Ultra said for a moment? He said that religion is a personal choice. The thing is, in most cases, it isn't. Most people are indoctrinated from the time they're born, and they fervently believe in their religion because it was burned into their brains when they were young. Think about it. If you had been raised to age twenty without any knowledge of any sort of religion, and then someone sat you down and explained every single religion in the world to you, are you absolutely certain you would pick the one you're in now (this only applies to people who didn't actually pick their religion themselves, just those who stuck w/ what they were raised in)? Or, better yet, if you had been raised in a different religion, do you think you would have switched over to the one you're in now (again, this doesn't apply if you're one of the few who did do that)?

The other thing is that most people seem to think that religion is a free choice, as long as you choose theirs. Even in a country as big on religious freedom as the US, there are numerous official references to a Mr. "God". "In God we trust", "one nation under God", etc. Just try to tell me this isn't an establishment of religion. "Oh, sure, you can believe in whatever religion you want, as long as you believe in our god."

Maybe if religion really were a matter of personal choice, and if everyone could accept that, we wouldn't have all these problems...

------------------
"Compared to you, every male on this ship is an expert on women!"
-Geordi LaForge to Wesley Crusher, TNG: "Sarek"
 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Maybe parents should tell their kids that they may not, under any circumstances, join any religion until they're 18. Then all the teenagers will be crowding to churches, mosques, etc.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"It's easy to learn to drive a golf cart, but it's hard to express yourself in one." - Larry Wall
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Well, this is starting to turn into a religious debate, which means it cannot be ended. And endless arguments belong in the Flameboard. So off with ye!

(Just a sidenote, but an important one: Don't take this move as a judgement on the quality of the arguments inside. I'm merely moving the thread to a more appropriate venue.)

------------------
"What did it mean to fly? A tremor in your soul. To resist the dull insistance of gravity."
--
Camper Van Beethoven

 


Posted by Fabrux (Member # 71) on :
 
Just a coupla questions. Why do so many people dislike Christian religions? And why is the Catholic faith in particular so unpopular?

------------------
Star Trek: Leeds
Creator, Producer, Only Writer

 


Posted by Vacuum robot lady from Spaceballs (Member # 239) on :
 
TSN: Yeah, I noticed that after I wrote it. I guess I should have clarified that is isn't for most people, expecially ones with feverently religious parents.

As for the discussion, I know Miracles are real, I see them on that 'Miracles' show on Space every once in a while. Plus, that milk-drinking Elephant, I mean, who can doubt that?


------------------
"I have never let my schooling interfere with my education."
-Mark Twain
 


Posted by Baloo (Member # 5) on :
 
A milk-drinking elephant? Get outta here! Who ever heard of a mammal drinking milk?

------------------
"Just because you know you're right doesn't mean you are."
-- Me
http://www.geocities.com/cyrano_jones.geo/



 


Posted by Curry Monster (Member # 12) on :
 
"She turned me into a newt! But I got better....."


Learn from that people.

------------------
"Blind faith is the crutch of fools"


 


Posted by The Talented Mr. Gurgeh (Member # 318) on :
 
In response to Ultra's suspiciously defensive response to my (admittedly a little aggressive) post, I would like to reiterate TSN's point that for most people, religion is not a matter of personal choice.
Religions perpetuate themselves by exploiting the filial bond. For example, let's just say a person's parents are devoutly Catholic(I choose Catholicism because, although it does not have extrovertly barbaric practices such as circumcision, it is, in my opinion, just as insidious in its propagation as any other I can think of). The Catholic church, the more one thinks about it, is a machine dedicated to increasing its size and power. It does not permit the use of contraceptives or abortion, it wants big families of God-fearing Catholics. It is only natural to follow ones parents when growing up, we all as young children looked up to our parents and never doubted that what they believed was true. So, what you get is this cycle, where the religious beliefs are passed down from parent to child, and so on, with each generation of children having little in the way of choice. If anyone doubts this, there is a film called "A Love Divided" which, I think illustrates this point adequately without expanding the truth.
Some of you may now say that I just have a big grudge against the church. However, I would not care about much of the above if I thought what they were saying was actually true. But I don't. As for "evidence" that God does not exist, well, to illustrate the folly of trying to prove that God does not exist, let me give an analogy:
As many of you may know, a mercury barometer consists of a tube of mercury upturned, with its opening immersed in mercury.

Now, what holds the ~76cm of mercury up? Back in the middle ages, "theories" were proposed which stated that the mercury was held up by angels from heaven using invisible strings. Is there anyone here who does not believe this theory which I am perfectly entitled to have? If so, try to disprove it. Maybe Ultra would like to try.
The point I am trying to make is, without trivialising peoples beliefs too much, is that belief in a God is an inherently unscientific practice, and therefore can not be disproved by scientific, logical, or factual means.

------------------
Try not.
Do.
Or Do not.
There is no try.


 


Posted by Fabrux (Member # 71) on :
 
Very fascinating speech, Guregh. But you didn't answer my question. In fact, no one did. This is one topic that I will not sit by and be ignored, like so many other conversations in which I get ignored...

------------------
"Keep on Trekking"
-D. Kelly

[This message has been edited by Fabrux (edited April 17, 2000).]
 


Posted by Jeff Raven (Member # 20) on :
 
I'm not so sure I agree with you Guresh on what religion is... It can be a personal choice.

Myself, although I don't follow a certain religion, I have chosen my beliefs. Whether or not they pertain to a religion or not doesn't matter. These ideas weren't forced on me. I chose Him.
People get the wrong idea about God. He wants us to choose him, and in the end it is ultimately our choice. That is why I think many religions have it wrong nowadays. Too many of them are all about forcing their views onto each other, when they should be letting people choose instead.

------------------
"No children have ever meddled with the Republican Party and have lived to tell about it." Sideshow Bob

 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
Man I hate to chime in after so much has been written (mostly cause I'm gonna get slammed again), but Fabrux raised a good point. I think the various Christian religions may get so much heat because most are nothing like the original Christian congregation. And despite a definition posted way up there of Christianity, a Christian means simply "a follower of Christ." I don't think most of the "Christian" denominations can claim to do things the way Jesus and the Apostles and the first century congregation did them. But that's me...

------------------
"A gathering of Angels appeared above my head. They sang to me this song of hope, and this is what they said..." -Styx

Aban's Illustration www.thespeakeasy.com/alanfore



 


Posted by BlueElectron (Member # 281) on :
 
Please help me out here.

Since that we're all suppose to be God's children, if a relatively nice person needs help, does he(she) has to "pray" for it? What happens if he(she) is not a Christian? Does he(she) still recieve the help from above?

------------------
Okey, okey, here's my question:

If you are an immortal, do you "rot" simply because of the
nuclear decay of the Carbon-14 particles inside your body?
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Y'know what the other problem is, besides the fact that most people don't "choose" their religion? They also don't tend to know anything about it. I was raised Catholic. Catholic grade school, Catholic high school, mass every Sunday... The whole nine yards. I'm now a freshman in college. It was not until now that I'm taking an ancient history course in a non-religious school, that I've finally been taught the real origins of the religion I was so immersed in. In grade school and high school, we were basically taught what the Bible, at first glance, seems to purport: ou old friend "I Am" has been talking to people since the beginning of time, and the belief in him has been around for as long as you can imagine. How many of you who belong to religons rooted in Judaism (Jews, Christians, Moslems, whatever) are aware that that religion didn't even exist until the time of the Exodus? "Yahweh" was a local god of the Sinai, whose worship the Egyptian Hebrews picked up on their trek between Egypt and Canaan. Back then, there was barely even a hint of monotheism. Ever noticed how, in those early writings, you get things like "your god" and "the god of Abraham", etc.? That's because early Judaism was completely polytheistic. They all believed in the Egyptian gods, the Mesopotamian gods, etc. They thought Yahweh was superior to the others, but they had no doubt that the others were just as real as their own. The only thing that made the early Hebrew religion any different than the Egyptian, Babylonian, Greek, Roman, etc. theologies was that they associated their god w/ themselves as a people, rather than associating him w/ a place, like most other cultures did. I was incredibly surprised to learn that Christianity (and the others) evolved from something that started out as nothing different than the other ancient pantheonic religions. Not only was I shocked, but I was apalled that I had spent thirteen years in Catholic schools, and never once had they even touched upon this fact. The religion was presented as being perfectly adherent to modern beliefs as far back as anyone could think. This is the sort of lying and manipulation (and matbe even self-delusion) that I find completely intolerable in religions. Maybe if more people actually knew what is was they were putting their faith in, they wouldn't be so quick to jump to it...

------------------
"Compared to you, every male on this ship is an expert on women!"
-Geordi LaForge to Wesley Crusher, TNG: "Sarek"
 


Posted by The Talented Mr. Gurgeh (Member # 318) on :
 
My name (username) is not Guresh. It is Gurgeh, and when, some day, I get Senior Member Status and my choice of status line, it will read: Gurgeh, The Player of Games.

Sorry, I just had to get that out of the way.

Oh yes, the religion thing. Good point by TSN. By ignoring, or at least skimming over the finitenes of the church's history, the church has aimed to enhance people's perception of it as a long-standing, infallible institution, and, I suppose, have partially succeeded in this.

Blue Electron, I think that you may find the knowledge you seek in my first post in this thread.

------------------
Try not.
Do.
Or Do not.
There is no try.


 


Posted by Jeff Raven (Member # 20) on :
 
Sorry, Gurgeh...my bad.

------------------
"No children have ever meddled with the Republican Party and have lived to tell about it." Sideshow Bob

 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
Well, Christianity did "evolve" from Judaism, no doubt. The Christian covenant was a replacement for the rejected Jewish covenant and Jesus followed Jewish law. And it is true that the Bible records the ancient Hebrews many times fell away as a nation and began worshiping the Gods of the surrounding nations. Like in the book of Judges. You'll notice though, that bad times usually followed. Things like drought and captivity usually resulted from false worship in the midst of Isreal. When the nation's attitude was corrected, they could once again enjoy their special relationship with Yahweh (or YHWH). The difference here is between the worship they were PRACTICING and the worship they were SUPPOSED to be practicing. The "pure" Hebrew religion had only one god. They of course recognized that the God's of the nations were real to the nations that worshiped them, but those god's were not a part of the Hebrew religion.

------------------
"A gathering of Angels appeared above my head. They sang to me this song of hope, and this is what they said..." -Styx

Aban's Illustration www.thespeakeasy.com/alanfore



 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
*plays the SOB again*

Oh, yeah, the Book of Judges. That's the one where the Jews practice human sacrifice. (Well, Jepthah, Judge of Israel, does, but it's mainly because he made a rash promise to God that if God helped him win this battle he was going to fight, he'd sacrifice the first thing he saw when he got home as a burnt offering. Well, to make a long story short, he won, and the first thing he saw when he got home was his own dear daughter.)
"Thanks, Dad!"

Of course, taking what is written in Judges etc. as factual history, is again dubious. It wasn't written then, after all, but much later. And is in the same tone that the Fundie Loons use to blame hurricanes and earthquakes on the US's 'turning away from God, booga-booga.'

------------------
"Nobody knows this, but I'm scared all the time... of what I might do, if I ever let go." -- Michael Garibaldi



 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
BTW, if you add vowels to "YHWH" you can get "Yahoo-Wahoo."

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"Frank, sometimes you are frightening on a scale that boggles the human imagination." - Krenim
 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
I believe Jeptha said he would offer the first person he saw to Jehovah (or God). He certainly didn't offer has a human sacrifice. The text says she went off with her friends for a month to "weep over her virginity". It then says that she never had sex during her life (evidently due to the nature of the service she was performing, I'll have to look it up) and that people would visit her all the time. Nowhere does it say she was given as a human sacrifice.

And I believe that any attempt to use the book of Judges to say that God now causes earthquakes and what not is pure craziness. God had a covanent relationship with the nation of Isreal which they were blatently violating. No such relationship has ever existed with any other physical nation nor does any such relationship currently exist.

00000 Addendum after rereading the Account 00000

My bad. Jephtha does in fact use the term burnt offering. My reason for saying that he didn't intend to actually burn someone alive are these:
1. Child sacrifice was explicitly and specifically condemned by Jewish law in Deuteronomy. Such a vow would never have been acceptable.
2. Jephtha's daughter apparently lived for many years after this account because people would visit her every year to give encouragement. This even thought his daughter went along with the vow and the vow was fulfilled.

The temple service conclusion is not arbitrary. There are other examples (Samuel I think) where parents had the right to devote their children to God's exclusive service in the Temple. This would also account for the fact that she never got married or had sex. This may be viewed by some as another example of "convenient metaphor" but I guess it all comes down to whether you view the Bible as consistant or inconsistant.
------------------
"A gathering of Angels appeared above my head. They sang to me this song of hope, and this is what they said..." -Styx

Aban's Illustration www.thespeakeasy.com/alanfore


[This message has been edited by Aban Rune (edited April 18, 2000).]

[This message has been edited by Aban Rune (edited April 19, 2000).]
 


Posted by Diane (Member # 53) on :
 
Fabrux: Christianity is the most targeted because, at least in western countries, it is the most visible and has the largest following. As for Catholics, nearly every Protestant Christian I've ever met who has had little or no direct contact with Catholic Christians have misconceptions and prejudices against Catholicism. Catholicism has almost entirely different rituals from Protestant churches (except Anglican and maybe Episcopal), and some people like to hate others for being different.

The Catholic Church, in some instances, is also liberal on social issues and Bible interpretations compared to the rest of the Christian denominations (although that is not to say that there aren't conservative Catholics), and that, I know for a fact, annoys the heaven out of Protestants. The Catholic Church believes that Creation is "just a story" (words of my religion teacher), and they believe in a non-literal interpretation of the Bible. Gurgeh's theory on Catholics and abortion are rather maliciously incriminating, since all Christians should be against abortion if they believe in the Ten Commandments ("Thou shall not kill"?). In the opinion toward homosexuals, the official message is this: they are not approved of and cannot get married within a Catholic setting because they cannot procreate. On the other hand, some churches have support groups for homosexuals, and that is far more tolerant than you can say for Protestants (another factor that annoys them).

Today's Clarification on Catholicism is brought to you by an agnostic from Ramona Convent Secondary School, a very liberal Catholic all-girls school.

------------------
"One more day before the storm
At the barricades of freedom!
When our ranks begin to form
Will you take your place with me?"
--Enjolras, "One Day More," Les Miserables

[This message has been edited by Tora Ziyal (edited April 18, 2000).]
 


Posted by Fabrux (Member # 71) on :
 
TZ: Thanks ever so for answering my question. This reminds me a bit of the situation with the high schools of my city - the students of the 3 other high schools in central Saint John are always putting down my school and it is postulated that this is because we offer so many things that those other schools don't.

------------------
"Keep on Trekking"
-D. Kelly
 


Posted by Curry Monster (Member # 12) on :
 
Judiasm itself was derived from Zorastrianism. You'll note that around the time of (supposedly) the parting of the Red Sea Persia ruled northern Egypt, Ramses III was a vassal. The most common religion of the time was Zorastrianism, as this is what the conquerors took with them. Judiasm and Christianity are much further down the track in the evolutionary timespan.

------------------
"Blind faith is the crutch of fools"


 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Aban: No, the Hebrews still believed in the existence of the other gods, they just weren't supposed to worship any other than Yahweh. It wasn't until somewhere around the time of David and Solomon and that lot, that they decided that Yahweh was the only god, rather than just being the only one that mattered. This is the problem. People are taught and believe that their monotheism is some sort of eternal constant, and that's why it's "right". And that's not even the only example of this sort of thing. Religions change over time, and yet everyone assumes "this is the way it, so this is the way it's always been, because it's 'right'". I mean, look at Buddhism. It started out w/ a prince who had some neat philosophical ideas. Now, he's a god. How does that work? And of course, if you suggested to a Christian that a similar situation could have caused the deification of Jesus, they think you were nuts. The gospels say Jesus performed miracles that no human could have, so he must have been a god, never mind that the gospels were written well after he was dead by people who wanted to convinve everyone that he was a god. People are quick to find the flaws in all other religions, while simply remaining willfully ignorant of the ones in their own. I hate willful ignorance...

------------------
"Compared to you, every male on this ship is an expert on women!"
-Geordi LaForge to Wesley Crusher, TNG: "Sarek"

[This message has been edited by TSN (edited April 21, 2000).]
 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
According to the Gospels and the Epistles, the first century Christians didn't believe Jesus was God. A spirit creature, yes. God, no. The Trinitarian philosphy didn't enter into 'Christian' worship until later.

And I'll be the first to admit that there are things I am ignorant of. But when I have questions, I ask. When I don't understand something, I do research. I simply can't understand why discussions like this must always include insults as well as an exchange of ideas. I have yet to call someone else's beliefs stupid. I totally understand how difficult it is believe in ANYTHING these days.

------------------
"A gathering of Angels appeared above my head. They sang to me this song of hope, and this is what they said..." -Styx

Aban's Illustration www.thespeakeasy.com/alanfore



 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
I re-read the Jepthah passage last night.

A couple of points:

1. Jepthah DID promise a burnt offering, as you admit to above.

2. It also states that when his daughter returned from bewailing her virginity, Jepthah kept his promise.
3. It does NOT say that people went and visited HER later, rather that they went out and bewailed her fate. You ASSUMED she was in the temple, based on your previous erroneous interpretation of Jepthah's promise.
So, either he actually did cook her, or the Bible is inaccurate.

------------------
"Nobody knows this, but I'm scared all the time... of what I might do, if I ever let go." -- Michael Garibaldi



 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
I will readily admit that this is a very tricky passage and there has apparently been a lot of debate and alot of criticism of this scripture. Indulge me for a moment though in a couple of other points. Before you read, this is again based on the conclusion I've made after studying it that the Bible is internally consistant. If you don't believe that the Bible is internally consistant, then none of this really matters since it's just all made up anyway. But that's a whole other discussion.

1. As I stated above, Jewish law expressly forbade "making children pass through the fire" or offering human sacrifice.
2. The Judges, including Jephthah were selected by God to deliver or serve as Judge for the Jews. This would necessitate that person being "righteous" or following God's law.
3. The account also says that God's spirit came over Jeptha when he made the vow. This would preclude the vow being unjust.
4. The only other example I can think of where human sacrifice was involved in a test of faith was when Abraham was told to sacrifice Isaac. When it came down to it, God didn't let that happen. He didn't require the actual murder of a child to prove faithfulness. And this was before the Law.
5. Burnt offerings symbolized whole devotion to God and accompanied many ceremonies likely including the presentation of a child for temple service. Jephthah may have been using the term "burnt offering" to denote the wholeness of the dedication he would make of whoever met him.
6. My translation says that the "daughters of Isreal would go to give commendation to the daughter of Jephtah." This to me suggests that she was still alive at this point.
7. In addition to the term "burnt offering", Jeptha also says that this person who meets him "must also become Jehovah's". Become Jehovah's could easily mean being dedicated to his service.

Again, I admit there is no direct evidence in the passage to back this up. I still believe though that the fact that the daughter did not bewail her impending death, but rather her virginity suggests she was not going to be roasted. I'm also taking the Bible as a whole and using some reasoning. And it comes down to a belief in the consistancy of the Bible based on a study of the rest of it.

------------------
"A gathering of Angels appeared above my head. They sang to me this song of hope, and this is what they said..." -Styx

Aban's Illustration www.thespeakeasy.com/alanfore


[This message has been edited by Aban Rune (edited April 20, 2000).]
 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
Over lunch, I ran downstairs to the adult library and picked out a half-dozen other versions of the Bible.

The exact translations vary, of course, from Bible to Bible (no wonder there are so many fights about what it says, nobody can TELL!), so it is really impossible to know for sure what happened here, although in both of the annotated Bibles I looked at, the annotators seem to hold my opinion that Jepthah did in fact kill his daughter (who was not really a child, but probably an adult), although one took the annual lamentations to mean that this had been a BAD thing to have done -- rather as a lesson on making rash promises to God.

------------------
"Nobody knows this, but I'm scared all the time... of what I might do, if I ever let go." -- Michael Garibaldi



 


Posted by Jeff Raven (Member # 20) on :
 
I'm finding many similarities with the stories of the Bible and ancient Greek Myth...

------------------
"No children have ever meddled with the Republican Party and have lived to tell about it." Sideshow Bob

 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
Try old Zoroastrian myth. Or if you can find them, Assyrian mythology and the Egyptian Aten-worship.

Of course, there are many similarities among the 'dying and reborn gods' mythological customs, too... Like Osiris, Dionysus, Orpheus, The Green Man, Apollonius of Tyria, etc.

------------------
"Nobody knows this, but I'm scared all the time... of what I might do, if I ever let go." -- Michael Garibaldi



 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Or the whole thing where the baby gets put in the river and is raised in one group, but later returns to where he started to fulfill his destiny, or whatever. The Bible has Moses doing it. Other stories based on the same premise include that of Oedipus, some other Greek one I forget, I think Gilgamesh, the first king of Persia whose name I also forget... Basically, the first part of the Bible is a mythology, no different from any other, except in that people still believe in it.

BTW, since the whole thing w/ Jephtah almost certainly never happened, maybe they couldn't decide whether or not to have him kill the girl, or just ruin her life, so the authors left it ambiguous... :-)

------------------
"Compared to you, every male on this ship is an expert on women!"
-Geordi LaForge to Wesley Crusher, TNG: "Sarek"
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
What form of Buddhism are you talking about, TSN?

------------------
"Oh, it's an anti-anti-WTO song. It's essentially a pro-Starbucks song. I saw this picture of a guy sticking his foot through a plate-glass window in a Starbucks in Seattle, and he was wearing a Nike. Man, couldn't you just change your shoes?"
--
M. Doughty


 


Posted by The Talented Mr. Gurgeh (Member # 318) on :
 
As this "discussion" has degenerated into a pathetic mythological debate about books written by ignorant people thousands of years ago, the truth of whose contents are highly questionable(Zorastrians, I mean, for fucks sake!! It sounds like something out Zelda64!!), I hereby withdraw any previous remarks I made and leave you to your idle chatterings. I'm sure I'll be missed, but logic has no place here.

------------------
"Try not.
Do.
Or Do not.
There is no try."
-Yoda, Jedi Master.



 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
How fortunate for you, as it doesn't have much place in your comments, either. :P

------------------
"Nobody knows this, but I'm scared all the time... of what I might do, if I ever let go." -- Michael Garibaldi



 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Gurgeh: Actually, there has been a surprising lack of illogic so far, considering the theological (and, thus, inherently illogical) nature of the discussion...

Sol: Erm... I don't know. I'm not really all that familiar w/ the internal workings of Buddhism. The point I was going for is how a group can see something in one group while totally ignoring the sae quality in themselves. Christians can see that ol' Siddhartha Gautama was a normal guy who was elevated to the level of a god by his followers, but most of them would never even consider the possibility that the same thing could have happened to Mr. Jesus from Nazareth, Judea.

------------------
"Compared to you, every male on this ship is an expert on women!"
-Geordi LaForge to Wesley Crusher, TNG: "Sarek"
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Well, he was elevated to the level of the Buddha, which isn't the same thing.

Though both do involve improbable metaphysical leaps.

------------------
"Oh, it's an anti-anti-WTO song. It's essentially a pro-Starbucks song. I saw this picture of a guy sticking his foot through a plate-glass window in a Starbucks in Seattle, and he was wearing a Nike. Man, couldn't you just change your shoes?"
--
M. Doughty


 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Well, it isn't the exact same thing. But there's still a parallel, which many people would be loath to admit.

------------------
Harold: "You're missing the point!"
Red: "Well, I don't like points."
-The Red Green Show
 


Posted by Curry Monster (Member # 12) on :
 
Gurgeh, just out of random curiosity, what's your problem with Zorastrians? I'm just trying to determine if your are either ignorant or just plain stupid. Please fill me in at your earliest convenience.

This may help bring you up to speed, it shows the regions ruled by Persian (Zorastrian) Emperors and Kings. If you want more, take a trip to a major library.
http://solareclipse.net/fmmp/persia.jpg


------------------
"Blind faith is the crutch of fools"

[This message has been edited by Daryus Aden (edited April 24, 2000).]

[This message has been edited by Daryus Aden (edited April 24, 2000).]
 


Posted by The Talented Mr. Gurgeh (Member # 318) on :
 
It seems I have been dragged back into the fray.
First of Two: Assimilate this \/ !!!

My problem isn't with Zorastrians in particular, I just don't see the point in sifting through old history books whose contents are thousands of years old and have probably been expanded far beyond what actually may have occurred. Just as TSN said, theology is inherently illogical, this is my gripe with this thread.

------------------
"Try not.
Do.
Or Do not.
There is no try."
-Yoda, Jedi Master.



 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
"Those who refuse to examine and learn from history have no past. And no future." -- T.Paine

------------------
"Nobody knows this, but I'm scared all the time... of what I might do, if I ever let go." -- Michael Garibaldi



 


Posted by Curry Monster (Member # 12) on :
 
Hmm. If that's your view, then ok. You're entitled to it.

------------------
"Blind faith is the crutch of fools"


 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
When I loaded this page this morning, it was stalled for a long time with my little loading bar reading "6% of 66K."

THREE SIXES?!?!?!?!
It's a SIGN!!!
I KNEW it! I KNEW this thread was the work of the Dev-ile!

*Dumps a gallon of blessed gatorade on his terminal*


.


.

See how easy it is to misinterpret coincidence?

------------------
"Nobody knows this, but I'm scared all the time... of what I might do, if I ever let go." -- Michael Garibaldi



 


Posted by Curry Monster (Member # 12) on :
 
lmao

------------------
"Blind faith is the crutch of fools"


 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3