This is topic New TMP FX shots! in forum General Trek at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/3/533.html

Posted by Mark Nguyen (Member # 469) on :
 
Check it out, homeys...
http://filmforce.ign.com/news/2115.html

Of note, look at the second picture of the series. They've moved the location of where that scene took place from the officer's lounge on the back of C Deck, to oneo fo the aft windows where the rec deck was supposed to be. Well, at least now the windows match more properly...

Mark

------------------
"Why build one, when you can have two at twice the price?"

- Carl Sagan, "Contact"



 


Posted by Spike (Member # 322) on :
 
Someone told me, that he bought a special TMP edition with new scenes on VHS, for example Sulu shows Illia how to navigate the ship.

Is this VHS special edition the same as on DVD?

------------------
"Second star to the right, and then straight on till morning."



 


Posted by Harry (Member # 265) on :
 
Wow, that new San Fransisco shot is awesome!

------------------
To know a thing well, know its limits. Only when pushed beyond its tolerances will true nature be seen.
The Amtal Rule (Dune)
---
Titan Fleet Yards - Harry Doddema's Star Trek Site


 


Posted by MrNeutron (Member # 524) on :
 
Fitz,

What your friend has on VHS is the 1980s "Special Longer Version" of TMP that has lots of little extra bits cut into it making a long film even longer, and introducing many continuity errors because it includes footage the director decided to scrap.

The version on DVD hasn't been seen outside of reviewers, and I don't think there's been an announcement about putting it on VHS.

 


Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
Why would Sulu show Ilia how to Navigate the ship? He's the helmsman. Chekov should come over and give her a hand. If he's not too busy "taaaaaaarrrrrrrgeettttttinnnnnnngggggg asssssttttterrrrrroiiiiiddddssss".

God, did Chekov not like his seat? During TOS and the films, he managed Navigation,. assistant science-officer (for reasons that escape me), chief of security, pseudo-captain (in STV. Thank god Sybok couldn't tell motion-picture rank pins apart), and whatever he was in ST V and VI.

------------------
"And Mojo was hurt and I would have kissed his little boo boo but then I realized he was a BAD monkey so I KICKED HIM IN HIS FACE!"
-Bubbles
 


Posted by BRUTUS on :
 
In TOS, Chekov often filled science officer roles.
 
Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :
 
And performing falsetto berserker-rages every third episode...
 
Posted by Psi'a Meese on :
 
I personally think that new shot is beautiful and does fit perfectly on Deck 6, to one side or the other of the Recreation room. Certainly resolves an age old debate amongst Trekkies.

A release of this product in the theatres would be great!

--
Purrr....

[This message has been edited by Psi'a Meese (edited March 08, 2001).]
 


Posted by MinutiaeMan (Member # 444) on :
 
::drool::

I keep hoping that they'll announce a special theater re-release for the film...

------------------
You know, you really should keep a personal log. Why bore others needlessly?
The Gigantic Collection of Star Trek Minutiae

 


Posted by MrNeutron (Member # 524) on :
 
Regarding the view from the Rec Room, Andy Probert wrote to be the other day and commented that the angle was wrong and that the room would have to be jutting 4 feet out the bottom of the saucer to get that perspective. Being that he heped design the darned ship, I guess he oughta know. LOL.

Unfortunately this is a case of fixing one continuity error and creating another, because while the only windows of that shape are on the rec deck, and the view from the lounge is roughly from that position...but the rec dec takes all 8 of the windows seen on the outside of the ship...so maybe they swap rooms into that part of the ship as neede? HAHAHA

 


Posted by Mark Nguyen (Member # 469) on :
 
Well, the rec deck may have been meant to take up that area of the saucer, but the set windows weren't really visible in the one shot we could possibly see them (with hundreds of extras in the way). The rec deck could therefore easily be elsewhere on that deck.

So it's really not a contnuity problem per se - other than screwing up a bunch of fandom blueprints made over the last two decades.

Mark

------------------
"Why build one, when you can have two at twice the price?"

- Carl Sagan, "Contact"



 


Posted by Psi'a Meese on :
 
Since Probert's blueprints from that film do label the rec deck location, I take him at his word.

MrNeutron (by the way, I know you ), am I to understand that Robert Wise or someome else from the production team didn't consult Probert, as to how best to place the room set?

------------------
Purrr...
 


Posted by Dax (Member # 191) on :
 
Is there any reason that the room can't be a lounge within the perimeter of the rec dec? After all, doesn't the complete rec deck take up two decks, and a much larger section of the saucer, than just that small room?

------------------
"Life's too short to be pissed off all the time." (Danny Vinyard, American History X)
Dax's Ships of Star Trek
 


Posted by Psi'a Meese on :
 
Dax, All depends upon reviewing TMP already on video. During the crew briefing, prior to Enterprise's departure, the back of the room showed the second level. It was full of crew members. Until I review this myself, I can't be certain of how many windows can be seen behind them or how I really feel about the topic.

------------------
Purrr...

[This message has been edited by Psi'a Meese (edited March 13, 2001).]
 


Posted by Dax (Member # 191) on :
 
It's been a very long time since I've seen TMP but I vaguely remember the crew briefing taking place in the cargo bay. Can anyone with the movie on video confirm (or refute) this?

------------------
"Life's too short to be pissed off all the time." (Danny Vinyard, American History X)
Dax's Ships of Star Trek
 


Posted by Mark Nguyen (Member # 469) on :
 
I *so* refute this. It's the rec deck. Don't you remember the pictures?
http://titan.spaceports.com/~nzcabac/PreFederation/Enterprise03a.htm

Mark

------------------
"Why build one, when you can have two at twice the price?"

- Carl Sagan, "Contact"



 


Posted by MrNeutron (Member # 524) on :
 
Regarding the officers louge/rec deck

Int he widescreen version of the film you can clearly see the rec deck has eight squarish windows in two rows of four. I also seem to recall you can also faintly see a painting of part of the spacedock and a portion of a pylon and nacelle outisde.

On the outside of the ship you can see those eight squarish windows on the back edge of the saucer to the starboard of the impulse engine (notably when the travel pod passes down between the engines).

These eight windows are the ONLY squarish ones on the ship.

The officer's lounge set re-used part of the rec-deck outer wall, and has the same windows. But since the rec deck takes those windows, there's no place for the lounge.

And Psi'a Meese...how do you know me???

Neutron

 


Posted by Peregrinus (Member # 504) on :
 
Um... There are also "square-ish" windows in the botanical section.

--Jonah

------------------
"It's obvious I'm dealing with a moron..."


--Col. Edwards, ROBOTECH


 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
And who knows what sort of shuttered viewports the ship has in other locations? The place that would provide a vista most closely matching the one in the new Lounge VFX would be the aft surface of the connecting neck, somewhat below saucer level...

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by MrNeutron (Member # 524) on :
 
Regarding Officer's Lounge windows. The squarish windows on the secondary hull are very rectangular and very vertical -- much taller than those seen in the officer's lounge. In fact, they're like a whole deck tall. As to shuttered windows, nice try...

Let's face it, it's a continuity error, plain and simple. The rec deck set windows were purposefully mirrored on the model, and the officer's lounge set reused a part of rec deck wall and no analogous windows were fitted to the miniature. As Andy Probert says, it was a budgetary decision because they didn't want to spend the money to build the "real" Rec Room (seen as a miniature when Spock's shuttle arrives).

Andy's suggestion at the time of the production was to rip out the wall with the windows and put a bluescreen there, then matte the miniature set there so it would be like Kirk and Co. were chatting in a back area of the deck, but no one wanted to do that and do reshoots. It's possible Foundation could have done the same digitally (much as ILM ripped out walls in the Special Edition of The Empire Strikes Back), but instead they recognized that the only matching windows to the set were where the Rec Deck is and moved the view from the set to this spot (hence the angle on the engine).

The easiest answer or all would be that these aren't windows at all, but viewscreens. I'm sure that idea could have been easily gotten across and this whole issue would be settled.


 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Speaking of ripping out... Isn't the simplest interpretation actually that after the initial briefing, somebody went and installed private modular cubicles behind each of the eight Rec Deck windows for the duration of the rest of the journey?

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by MrNeutron (Member # 524) on :
 
>Isn't the simplest interpretation actually that after
>the initial briefing, somebody went and installed
>private modular cubicles behind each of the eight
>Rec Deck windows for the duration of the rest of the
>journey?

What, and ripped them out again once they go sucked into V'ger so Decker and the Ilia-Probe could go back to the Rec-Deck and stand in front of those same windows? LOL

Again, nice try!

 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Seriously speaking, I thought the windows were not shown in the Decker-Iliaoid scenes at all? That the camera sat with the cameraman's back facing the windows all the time, or at most panning 90 degrees left or right?

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by MrNeutron (Member # 524) on :
 
You can plainly see the windows beyond the Ilia-Probe in several shots towards the end of the scene...but all you see outside them is blackness...well, until the Director's Edition comes out and we'll see V'ger interior outside.

 
Posted by Quatre Winner (Member # 464) on :
 
I'd just like to see more of V'Ger. That is one alien ship i've never been able to wrap my brain around....

------------------
In this crazy world of lemons, baby...you're lemonade!
 


Posted by MrNeutron (Member # 524) on :
 
Quatre Winner wrote...

>I'd just like to see more of V'Ger.
>That is one alien ship i've never been able to
>wrap my brain around....

Your wish is my command! I scanned one of Syd's Mead's sketches for the model and it can be found at...
http://home.pacbell.net/mauricem/vger.gif

This image appears in the Star Trek Phase II book, but is incorrectly labeled an "early" concept...but it's very near final. Some small details changed at the very back, but it's essentially correct in shape to the final.

It's not clear in the film, but the Enterprise initially approached V'ger from behind, passes along it, and then is sucked into the "maw" at the front end (an ingenious mechanism that's actually very simple but looks more complex than it is).

My wish is that they'd actually SHOW V'ger in the DE version...there's a storyboard showing V'ger eclipsing the sun, and such a shot would allow a hint of the overall shape without having to show it in great detail. Imagine seeing THAT in the sky!

Neutron
 


Posted by Daniel (Member # 453) on :
 
I agree with mrneutron. The best explanation is that we are looking at a small room with a viewing screen. The window visible in that shot is too SMALL to be one of the rec-deck windows. As a matter of fact, (although I KNOW it's non-canon), Mr. Scott's Guide has a floorplan of the officer's lounge which has two small lounge areas with viewers about the size in the picture. These are forward of the main lounge windows in the B-C deck aft hull superstructure.

Timo ... nonononono. I'm sorry, but that shot cannot be made from the aft dorsal. If it were, you'd be looking at the "matter-acquisition-sink," (or whatever), on the inside of the starboard nacelle. The angle is all wrong. It has to be right where the rec-deck windows are or that other place sticking out of nowhere that someone else mentioned.

[This message has been edited by Daniel (edited March 18, 2001).]
 


Posted by MrNeutron (Member # 524) on :
 
>The window visible in that shot is too SMALL to be
>one of the rec-deck windows.

But it IS one of the windows fromthe Rec Deck set.

>Mr. Scott's Guide has a floorplan of the officer's
>lounge which has two small lounge areas with viewers
>about the size in the picture.

Actually, what that book did was copy and slightly modify Andy Probert's floorplan of how to tie the live action set into the miniature set. Andy's idea was to reshoot the shots of the characters in front of the windows but replace the wall with a bluescreen and then matte in the miniature lounge beyond. The book's version just leaves the wall in. So, if you presume the windows are "screens" then that room could be just about anywhere in the ship.

Neutron

[This message has been edited by mrneutron (edited March 21, 2001).]
 


Posted by Daniel (Member # 453) on :
 
Mrneutron, I never said the rec-deck SET. IMO, they are too small to be the windows of the rec deck if the measurements of the windows on the Enterprise model/schematics were used. The windows on the model, if scaled up appropriately, couldn't possibly be as small as the screen/window in the lounge.

Assuming we're rescaling the schematics of the Enterprise so that the decks are 9-10 feet in height with 1 foot deckspace between, then one of the STANDARD windows, (i.e., the round/ovalesque portholes), would probably be, (I'm most definitely estimating here), 3 or 4 feet from top to bottom. The rec-deck windows if scaled accordingly would be between 5 or 5.5 or 6 feet from top to bottom.

The window seen in that screenshot didn't appear to be 5 or 6 feet from top to bottom. However, please note that I understand the decklines/windows don't line up on the Enterprise, so my suppositions may be incorrect or invalidated.

I do know that the floorplan in Scott's Guide was modified. I've seen both versions. It just seemed to make more sense that they were in the officer's lounge and I thought that was what the assumption was. There could definitely be more lounge areas elsewhere aboard in the primary hull, (I hope there are), but the officer's lounge is, well, for the officers. I highly doubt that they would have gone anywhere in the secondary hull to have their little chat. (Besides, why would they PUT a lounge in the secondary hull? That whole area seems a bit restricted on space.)

***

I took another look at that pic, and it actually looks to be about five feet high even though the width would be wrong, as it should be half again the width in the screenshot. Still, if the height is right, I humbly digress and apologize for my overzealous nitpicking.

[This message has been edited by Daniel (edited March 21, 2001).]
 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3