This is topic $$$ Impressions of "Broken Bow" and "Enterprise" $$$ in forum General Trek at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/3/2209.html

Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
Just in case you missed the six $'s in the subject line ...

SPOILERS!

With that done ...

Wow. Awesome!

Well written, well acted (well, as well acted as Star Trek can be), great action sequences -- !

I didn't like the gel scene between T'Pol and Tucker. Certainly too fan-boyish. Anyone drooling over Jolene in this month's Maxim ("Well, I love when I sort of come to and I'm on the other side of the room, sweaty and breathing heavy, with bottles and ashtrays tipped over everywhere. I'm, like, 'What just happened? Oh, yeah, I got laid. Gotcha.'") won't be disapointed, but it seemed a bit risque for a Star Trek series. ::shrug::

I love the sets. They're so wonderfully detailed ... although I found myself wondering what Archer would say if he found himself standing on the bridge of the Enterprise-D. "Holy crap, this is big!"

The Rigellian mining station (or whatever it was) looks like something you'd see in TOS ... (except, obviously, better details and such).

I'd like to see more interaction between Sato and Mayweather. She hates spaceships, he loves 'em. I'd like to see something happen there.

I think we can probably add that mysterious room where the Suliban leaders confrences with his leader from the future as one of the standing sets of Enterprise. I think we'll be seeing it again.

I loved the opening credits ... I loved Zephram's speech. I thought the incorporation of some of the familiar opening speeches ("new life, and new civilization... to boldy go where no man has gone before") was done very well, didn't sound all that corny. I was hoping, at the end, Archer would sit down and say, "Space. The final frontier. These are the voyages of the Starship Enterprise, her new mission to seek out strange new life, and new civilizations. To boldly go where no man has gone before!"

Ah well.

I liked that we learn that there are sixty-or so dialects of the same Klingon language. I liked seeing the Klingon Hall, although I was kind of hoping to see a Klingon ship. I guess we'll get to see more of them later. The First Contact didn't seem to be so disasterous ... yet ... of course, the Klingons don't seem very open with what they're thinking, so I guess we'll find out more on that later.

Well, I think that about sums up what I thought of Enterprise. For the first time since Deep Space Nine went off the air, it seems there's finally a series worthy of carrying on the Star Trek legacy.
 


Posted by Phycro Onyx (Member # 579) on :
 

OH MY GOD........(faint)
Great job!!!
paramount out did themselves this time no timeline screwups either
 
Posted by Veers (Member # 661) on :
 
A good show. The best special effects of a pilot so far...an Emmy coming up next year?
I forgot about the Klingons and the Akira-look of the Enterprise and enjoyed myself. Too bad we haven't seen more of them phaser rifles, that
Gomer the farmer was handlin' at the beginnin'.
"Yee-haw! Us Oklahomans will take out them aliens!"

Aside from that, we had a good story and cast (John Billingsley, from those celluar phone commercials). He reminded me of Neelix. We had an exotic chef, now an exotic doctor!
One question: was that James Cromwell on that computer screen near the beginning? It sounded like him, and looked like him in a way. Probably they just took someone who sounded like him and put him on.

No doubt they'll be a future episode about Archer's father, and in another he'll be brought back to life (if he's dead) somehow.

Thos eare my thoughts .
 


Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
No, that actually was James Cromwell. Not a really big surprise -- he guest starred in quite a few episodes of The Next Generation ("The Hunted", comes to mind) before he made it "big."
 
Posted by Dukhat (Member # 341) on :
 
After watching "Broken Bow", I must say this:

I take back everything negative I may have said about Enterprise.

That was one of the most moving opening credits I have ever seen. I would watch this show every Wednesday just to see that again & again.

I'm with Jeff. The only negative aspect of the episode I found was the gel scene, for the same reasons. Even so, it was 100% better than every Chakotay/Seven scene in "Endgame."

There's so much more I want to say, but I think I'll rewatch my tape again first.
 


Posted by TheF0rce (Member # 533) on :
 
i can live with the gel thing

a little bit worried in seeing t'pual behave just like 7 of 9

but over all got a good night's worth of entertainment.

i also did think the infiltrate the sulliban base thing was pretty lazy though.
 


Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
Suliban --> Taliban.

The capital of Afghanistan is "Kabul", and they mentioned something in the episode in reference to the Suliban heirarchy which sounded a lot like Kabul.
 


Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :
 
It was actually Cabal
 
Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
Still, a very strong link to "Kabul" ... don't you think?
 
Posted by Obese Penguin (Member # 271) on :
 
I have officialy joined the Enterprise band wagon.

I agree fully with Jeff , the acting was good , no doubt as the cast begins to get closer the acting will get better as we go along.

The SFX were great , considering and I'm sure that once Paramount sees some returns from Enterprise ratings wise the SFX budget will grow.

The Enterprise looks great , you Akiraprisers , move on!

Dr. Phlox's smile was just werid , very creepy. I like that.

The Decon scene was a bit non trekish but atleast it wasent sexist , the Camera went both ways , Tucker and T'Pol , not to mention Archers Undies , I just hope they dont make that a running gag with Archer like Kirk and his tattered shirts.

Overall I'm very happy with this series premeire , and I will definatly be watching next week , I'm pretty sure by then the acting will be even better and it does look like the crew is starting to take to T'Pol , if they stay on track with this , I will be a very happy viewer.
 


Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
Now, if we can only get you to place your commas directly after the end of the word, and not [space],[space][new word] ...

:)
 


Posted by Soundwave (Member # 138) on :
 
I'm glad I was one of those people with the "Wait and see, give it a chance" type attitude of not judging Enterprise until after it aired.

The only thing I don't like, off the top of my head, if the opening music. Visually it's great... but that music just doesn't fit. I wish they stuck with instrumental stuff.

PS: Think you have enough $s Jeffy? I still think anyone with common sense would relize that there would be spoilers for Enterprise in an Enterprise forum, not to mention the title in this case speaks for itself.

[ September 26, 2001: Message edited by: Soundwave ]


 
Posted by Ryan McReynolds (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Soundwave:
The only thing I don't like, off the top of my head, if the opening music. Visually it's great... but that music just doesn't fit. I wish they stuck with instrumental stuff.

This is a criticism of Enterprise I can mostly agree with. I don't mind the fact that it's vocal so much that it's so "current." Even those who like the song will cringe at Enterprise reruns in thirty years. Maybe if they had made a legitimately "operatic" version, it would work, but the use of soft rock is questionable. I do like the muted, instrumental version used durng the commercial breaks and closing credits, though.
 


Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
Soundwave,

I've been very conservative in my use of spoiler warnings. But I guess you didn't notice the really big emphasis Charles has placed on making sure people don't spoil themselves (All new topics concerning the premiere episode require spoiler warnings. Do so by placing either the word 'Spoiler' in the subject line, or including the customary series of dollar signs.
Example: "Oh mah gawd, that was great $$$$poilers")
, given that many Flare members won't see Enterprise for years, yet might still stop in to the forum for news on Enterprise.

Or, "PLEH!"

[ September 26, 2001: Message edited by: Malnurtured Snay ]


 
Posted by Alshrim Dax (Member # 258) on :
 
I believe that everything I've been saying in defence of Enterprise (Akiraprise, Prequel premise is gonna suck) has been prooven correctly.

*glows brightly*

I FREAKIN' LOVED IT!!!

This was the best acting i've seen come out of a pilot! Jolene was a great vulcan .. and Sato is a great character.

I'm gonna have to get use to Phlox.. but he's cool!

Bakula is a great fit as a captain.. takes no shit, that guy!!!! They play well with character interaction ...

The gel scene was a little much, but am I the only one that doesn't remember ANY of the true dialogue in that scene??? **Just pokin' fun**

Ok .. so..

Thing that some in other threads are picking on!!

The Enterprise takes a pounding ... without shields... WE have to remember that weapons in this century aren't the weapons they are in TOS .. I think as things move on .. we may see phaser on the ship becoming a little more advanced... HOw will they do upgrades without a Starbase ..

There will be no, "Set course to the nearest Starbase."

I think what they did was they took the Voyager premise (Take a lone ship out on its own) and made it a "Where no one has gone before" attitude with characters that aren't bound by a Eutopia mindset. The humans are not the superior morality of the universe here... they are inferior as the Vulcans are reminding them all the time.. (This aspect of the vulcan/human relationship, I think is great).

Also.. people are saying the T'Pol and her ilk were a little too emotional... Well.. they are 100 or so years before "Spock" .. they aren't as refined .. just as the humans aren't as refined... a few 'primitive' differences should be expected.. and IMHO, it makes it fresh.

That is what ENTERPRISE is ... FRESH

Two thumbs up!!

[ September 27, 2001: Message edited by: Alshrim Dax ]


 
Posted by Proteus (Member # 212) on :
 
I loved it as well. I would give it a 91%. As for the gel scene, although its not very much like trek, as a straight guy I can appretiate a... very nice.. female body..

I cant wait for next week!
 


Posted by Veers (Member # 661) on :
 
Next week:
No one can wait for first contact...
We are boarding the vessel...
*scream*
What could be inside? The UPN archives?

I too, have taken back what I first said about Enterprise, about the Akira and other things.
 


Posted by Ryan McReynolds (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Alshrim Dax:
The Enterprise takes a pounding ... without shields... WE have to remember that weapons in this century aren't the weapons they are in TOS ..

We also have to remember that every time the ship goes itno battle, Archer says "polarize the hull plating" for a reason. For all intents and purposes, Enterprise has shields, they're just integrated with the hull itself.
 


Posted by Stingray (Member # 621) on :
 
I thought it was okay.

My friends who were much more casual viewers (remember that wider audience base we were always talking about?) thought it was okay.

The writing was somewhat wooden. Bakula's acting was great and his writing was above par with everybody else. I fear we may end up getting many many shows focusing on a single person to the exclusion of others again.

Blalock was good, definetely emotional, but I liked where Archer would catch her in the act. All the Vulcans seemed perpetually pissed off at humans. Not the kind of relationship that you think humans would tolerate for a hundred years. They were most likely just pissed off for that particular event, but we should've gotten some better scenes regarding the status quo relationship of human/Vulcans.

Other characters were excellent and would be outstanding if the writing was better. Billingsly did a fantastic job, but his makeup still irks me as being too human. They've done extensive regular character make up before (Worf, Data, Neelix, etc.) that would go a long way for him.

Sets were very nice. I like the entire of the Akiraprize. Though Trek AG shouldn't produce a sweet spot, I'll let that nitpick go for the time being. Special effects were incredible.

I like the ship out of context with the other series. I'm willing and able to watch this show and not get mad about the ship, but my feelings about it's creativity and lineage remain unchanged.

Overall, there was nothing special about the plot. No great premise was set up really. Klingon first contact didn't turn out as horribly as we were lead to believe. We only get the vaguest of notions about the EFG. And at least I got the impression that they weren't interested in Archer/Akiraprize at all. "We don't want to involve the humans. Not yet anyway." The sentence and its tone make it abundantly clear that they are after somebody else. And story wise, where is the fun in that?

I laughed:

At the gel scene. Just because it was completely ludicrous.

At Phlox's line where he sounded exactly like those guys from Galaxy Quest.

The worst thing besides the gel scene:

The couple of flashback scenes with Archer as a kid w/ his father and the model spaceplane. Once again: Star Trek + children = crap. Thankfully, there were very few of such scenes.

Conclusion:

The writing needs to get better, but there is a lot of potential. If the writing were to get on par with TNG or (dare I even suggest it as a possibility) DS9, then we would have one outstanding show.
 


Posted by Kosh (Member # 167) on :
 
The only complaint I have is the "Gel scene", that brought them down to the level of Black Scorpion", but only for the duration of the scene. I was pleasently surprised by the rest of the episode.


 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
quote:
Though Trek AG shouldn't produce a sweet spot...

Why?
 


Posted by Stingray (Member # 621) on :
 
It's just the way I see it, and I should've specified as much. If you have another opinion, good. But I'm not about to get into an argument about it here. Start a thread in Starships and Tech if you're so inclined.
 
Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Just a question. I mean, we've got no idea whether 22nd century gravity generation technology is anything like the stuff described in the TNG tech manual. For instance, the dialogue seemed to suggest a single source for it, rather than the Galaxy's (and presumably many other ships') distributed system. Seeing as how they don't have tractor beams, a single large gravity generator might be all they can manage.

Though Archer's toy certainly seemed to be using antigravity. But maybe the sons of very important engineers get perks (perhaps Vulcan in origin?) that the poor children of doctors and lawyers and meat vendors don't.
 


Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
The gel scene was ridiculous.
The scene was two officers os a ship arguing, or at least debating opinions. The director obviously didnt want the audience to listen though.. several times they cut to close ups of Jolene's body while Tucker was talking. How did this help to advance the story? If Tucker had been checking her out, it would fit the flow of the moment. But he wasnt, aside from the parts where he had to touch her, he was interacting with her verbally and intellectually as they spoke, and not paying attention to her body. The close up of her stomach particularly, just completely detracted from the flavor of the scene, which should have been a little hostile.

Only towards the end of the scene did the dialogue start to synchronize with the action, like T'Pol's parting shots being while she was rubbing him down. That was actually effective to portraying their interaction, having her take the dominant role in the discussion while she took the dominant role in the act of violating his personal space.
But this was after her rubdown was complete. I'd be interested to know whos decision it was to cut the the closeups of her body.. editor? director? producer? studio? network? whoever did it screwed up someone elses well done scene
 


Posted by Stingray (Member # 621) on :
 
[Son of a bitch...]

[ September 28, 2001: Message edited by: Stingray ]


 
Posted by Stingray (Member # 621) on :
 
Personally, I love how they had to rub gel on each others' spots that they could've easily reached themselves. Like the waistline and abdomen.
 
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
I'm glad you two agree on that.

Did anyone notice how they reshot 3 days of Jolene's scenes with the new wig.. the ready room scene seemed to cut back and forth like crazy.
 


Posted by Krenim (Member # 22) on :
 
Hey, Kosh... Since I'm assuming you and I were watching the same channel last night, let me ask you a question. Were you getting the same problems watching Enterprise (volume really low for the first half-hour, really obnoxious video problems the last hour or so, etc) that I was?
 
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
I lost video as T'Pol and Tucker were arriving for their scene on the surface. It degraded into pixels and was replaced by a green scan line, indicating it was interruption before broadcast, and not airborne interference but something digital from their feed. thats on a UPN broadcast affiliate in New England
 
Posted by Matrix (Member # 376) on :
 
Holy Shit! God Damn this was so unexpected for this series. This was definitely something that has so much potential that it could get as popular as Star Trek TNG.

I liked:
Everything, I liked the beginning, the opening shots in the farm, and opening credits. That was different from the rest, in terms of no ship wooshing by, or beauty shots of the ship, just flash back scenes from 'real' life and First Contact.

I hated:
The Gel scene, there was no reason why there had to be a gel scene. That made an almost perfect episode (for once) into a almost Voyager/Shit episode. The writers could definitely rewrote that differently. I guess next episode wil have her taking a bubble bath right?

Characters:
Archer: He obviously is a natural Trek captain. I think the writers will wirte alot of episodes between Archer and T'Pol. (sounds familiar?)

T'Pol: To me she's just there for a new 7 of 9 but this time she will be through the entire series. I think she needs to be more Vulcan because she seems to be alittle 'human'.

Dr. Phlox: He seems to be a mix of the Doctor from Voyager, the people from Galaxy Quest and Neelix. I think he is the comedy relief.

Mayweather: I have no clue what the future for this guy will be.

Tucker: I have no clue, I think he gets pregnant later in the series right?

Sato: I think she's a bit afraid of ships.

Reed: For some reason I think he and the Doctor will be the ones battling each other like Quark and Odo.

If each episode is like the one last night, then we got a winner and a replacement for the TNG crew for the movies.
 


Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
'replacement'.. not my style.. i had fun though.

I was a little sketched by the way Phlox went into that Galaxy Quest riff.. i wonder if it was on purpose? Still at least he isnt Neelix.
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Phlox is a competant Zoidberg. I think that's a good thing.
 
Posted by Commander Dan (Member # 558) on :
 
Well, I watched, and I marginally enjoyed. After mulling it over for 24 hours, here is my take on the premiere of Enterprise:


The Good,

Scott Bakula’s performance. Definitely the best part of the show. I was happy when I heard Bakula was on board as captain and I am even happier now after seeing Archer on-screen.

Homages to TOS. Communicators and their sounds. The bridge “scanner” used by T’Pol. Ship wide intercoms.

The shuttlecraft design. One of few designs in Enterprise that actually has some visual believability as far as existing before the TOS era.

The “uneasiness” the crew has with the transporters. I rather like this aspect of the show.

Archer’s Dog. My wife and I are “dog people,” as we call ourselves, so I liked the dog! The pooch can stay!


The Bad,

The Story. While I found the plot itself “average,” the episode as a whole “felt” (at least to me) as if it had been thrown together somewhat haphazardly, with little regard to detail or continuity. It didn’t seem to “flow” very well.

“Technobabble.” Too much gibberish for my tastes.

The “Temporal Cold War” plot device. Pretty pathetic. It would have been much better to simply focus on the “disastrous first contact with the Klingon(s).”

The disastrous first contact with the Klingon(s). While I agree that “first contact” did not go so well, it seemed to fall short of being the “disastrous” event that I had envisioned.

The Music: I am a musician by trade, so this is a big deal to me. I certainly do not care for the “pop-song” theme, but I do not necessary find it that offensive. No offense to composer Dennis McCarthy, but I really wish that B&B would have considered some new talent so we could get out of that “Voyager/DS9 feeling” that continued to lurk in the background of Enterprise.

Not enough Homages. While I applaud the homages that do exist, I still think that more are warranted. I would have liked to have seen TOS style rank stripes, the “tracer” below the main view screen, rectangular windows, and/or more TOS-like panels and readouts (similar, not exact), just to name a few.

The ship interior. Not too bad, really; but a little bit too “busy” (I thought) for pre-TOS.


The Ugly,

I was immediately disenfranchised when the first images of the “Akiraprise” were released. Still, I originally thought it was a fairly “neat” design, though quite unoriginal and certainly not believable as a ship that predates the TOS Enterprise. After watching Enterprise, I can honestly say that I now like the Akiraprise even LESS.

Klingon Warbirds? Is no one at Paramount doing their homework?

A space-age shotgun? How hokey is that?

Warp Travel. I found myself immediately questioning how and why they were able to travel so quickly from Earth to the Klingon Homeworld. Not to mention their little excursion to Rigel.

The “gel” scene.

I still have issues with continuity…


Overall Thoughts,

I really feel that this show is walking on thin ice, and I just can’t seem to get around that feeling.

Isn’t Spock supposed to be the first Vulcan in Starfleet? Yeah, yeah, I know… This isn’t the FEDERATION Starfleet, it’s EARTH’s Starfleet. And T’Pol isn’t really even a member of Earth’s Starfleet, she is just “tagging along” for tickles and grins.

And what about the “Akiraprise” itself? Obviously this is a pretty big deal with humans just beginning to venture out into the great unknown of space, yet we have only now learned of the NX-01? There has never been ANY previous mention of this “Starship Enterprise,” and in fact, the NCC-1701 has always been referred to as the “first” Starship Enterprise.

Right, right… I got it, EARTH Starfleet versus the FEDERATION Starfleet. Sure… Like I said, Thin ice…

B&B could have avoided SOME of this controversy simply by naming the ship something OTHER than Enterprise (Akiraprise, perhaps?). It just seems that the more Trek that B&B produces, that many more “rationalizations” must be conceived amongst the fans in order to “preserve” continuity.

Is Enterprise just a TV show? Sure… But the problem is, it is based on something that has become MORE than “just a TV show. How many books and articles have been written on the mythos and fandom of Star Trek, not to mention how Star Trek has embedded itself into our 20th Century (and 21st) culture.

TPTB have a certain responsibility to make the show somewhat “believable,” even in Sci-Fi. Because this is a PREQUEL, this should occur on TWO fronts. First, the stories, characters, and events should be believable within the context of Enterprise. Second, the stories, characters, and events should be believable in the context that they occurred BEFORE The Original Series.

This is where I have a MAJOR problem with the Akiraprise. I see it, yet I do not really believe that this is a ship that could have existed before the TOS Enterprise. Even Wednesday night, I had to kick myself a couple of times through the course of the episode to remind myself that this is supposed to be happening BEFORE The Original Series.

I will continue to watch and see how the show turns out. To be fair, I will have to see at least a season (maybe more) in order to really judge the show appropriately. I can say this, however: I never got that “tingly feeling” (sometimes referred to as the “chill factor”) while watching the premiere of Enterprise. In actuality, it has been a long, long time since I last had that feeling while watching Star Trek…

Dan

[ September 27, 2001: Message edited by: Commander Dan ]


 
Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
quote:
Isn’t Spock supposed to be the first Vulcan in Starfleet?

No, not really.
 


Posted by Vogon Poet (Member # 393) on :
 
Yes, because he was stated to be the first Vulcan in the original series, which isn't canon anymore. . .
 
Posted by Alshrim Dax (Member # 258) on :
 
Technically, T'Pol isn't Starfleet! She's a chaperone!
 
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
nobody EVER said Spock was the first Vulcan in Starfleet.. that idea was started in a couple of novels
 
Posted by Vogon Poet (Member # 393) on :
 
Wait a minute, you absolutely sure about that?! I mean, it's one of the biggest contradictions in original-series Trek, that how can Spock be the first Vulcan in Starfleet when the Intrepid has an all-Vulcan crew. Now you're telling us that one half of that contradiction is actually non-canon? Or is this typical TOS-hating Retcon, that Spock CAN'T be the first Vulcan in Starfleet because T'Pol is?
 
Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
I don't believe anyone has ever been able to find anything in TOS that proves or even suggests that Spock was the first. But I'll keep looking. In the meantime, by all means, let's keep believing as much fandom crap as possible to make sure this series fails.
 
Posted by Ryan McReynolds (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Vogon Poet:
Wait a minute, you absolutely sure about that?! I mean, it's one of the biggest contradictions in original-series Trek, that how can Spock be the first Vulcan in Starfleet when the Intrepid has an all-Vulcan crew. Now you're telling us that one half of that contradiction is actually non-canon?

Is this news? Spock was never stated to be the first Vulcan in Starfleet in any filmed Star Trek episode or movie. Go ahead, watch them all, it's nowhere to be found. I though everyone knew that by this point...
 


Posted by Alshrim Dax (Member # 258) on :
 
Actually... I read this from www.startrek.com in Spock's Bio
quote:

Because the young Vulcan chose to join Starfleet, he and Sarek opened an 18-year rift over Sarek's hope his son would attend the Vulcan Science Academy. Spock was the first Vulcan to enlist in the Federation Starfleet, serving aboard the U.S.S. Enterprise under Captain Christopher Pike as a lieutenant, and later for James T. Kirk

http://www.startrek.com/library/individ.asp?ID=112508

Read it an weap boys and girls!!

But it clearly states FEDERATION STARFLEET!....
 


Posted by Ryan McReynolds (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Alshrim Dax:
Read it an weap boys and girls!!

What relevance does a quote from a Web site have with regards to the fact that, canonically, there was no mention of Spock being the first Vulcan to join Starfleet. Did I miss some ceremony in which the writers of the official Star Trek Web site gained the power to have their statements carry even the slightest authority?
 


Posted by Alshrim Dax (Member # 258) on :
 
Umm. Ya!! The site is run by Paramount!! Who owns the rights to Star Trek!!! I'd say they have an authority on Star Trek. Just reporting what's there man ... nothing more..

It's also in the encyclopedia if I'm not mistaken... I'll go home and check it for sure!
 


Posted by Obi Juan (Member # 90) on :
 
I am going to have to dig out the videos, because I swear it was said. It may have been slightly different though, like "first vulcan Starfleet officer" or "first vulcan through the academy." And we have already filled up numerous threads arguing/explaining how that comment does not necessarily contradict the fact that there were starships fully staffed by vulcans during the period of TOS (Vulcan membership in the Federation could have been provisional, with the Vulcan military not being absorbed into Starfleet until after Spock had attended the academy.

Of course the first vulcan in Starfleet line didn't seem to make much sense at the time it was said and I wouldn't really mind if it was ignored.

quote:
No offense to composer Dennis McCarthy, but I really wish that B&B would have considered some new talent so we could get out of that “Voyager/DS9 feeling” that continued to lurk in the background of Enterprise.

I couldn't agree with you more. I didn't like the score at all. It really gave the show a DS9/Voyager feeling that it otherwise wouldn't have had (and that detracted from the mood they were trying to create).
 


Posted by Obi Juan (Member # 90) on :
 
quote:
Umm. Ya!! The site is run by Paramount!! Who owns the rights to Star Trek!!! I'd say they have an authority on Star Trek. Just reporting what's there man ... nothing more..
It's also in the encyclopedia if I'm not mistaken... I'll go home and check it for sure!

Said or shown onscreen = canon.

Stated in script or series bible, written by the Okuda's, posted on the official website, stated by Braga, Berman, Pillar, Roddenberry, and God but not said or shown onscreen = noncanon

[ September 28, 2001: Message edited by: Obi Juan ]


 
Posted by Ryan McReynolds (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Obi Juan:
I am going to have to dig out the videos, because I swear it was said.

By all means. I assure you the search will be futile, but it's always fun to rewatch original series episodes.

For what it's worth, I think the myth originated with "Journey to Babel." Because Sarek disapproved of Spock's decision to join Starfleet, fans may have misinterpreted that to mean that Vulcans don't usually join Starfleet in general. In fact, it actually referred to Sarek's preference that Spock attend the Science Academy. But it's easy to see how pre-VCR fans might think otherwise... and that could grow very quickly through word of mouth.
 


Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
Um.. the guys on the website have made up a lot of shit.. a lot of it that will be or could be proven untrue.. i wouldnt trust it any more than the stuff that Okuda made up for the Chronology. Just because he works for Paramount doesnt mean that everything he makes up is canon (or is even plausible!)

For the record, i think that two of the older novels that could be considered canon are The Motion Picture novelization by Roddenberry and Vulcan's Glory by D.C.Fontana (the TOS staffer who crafted the Vulcans as a race in writing 'Journey to Babel' and 'Amok Time'), Since the two of them are much more important to Trek's history than those jokers B&B. Fontana's book is set during Spocks first mission on the Enterprise under Captain Pike and features a half-dozen Vulcan crewmembers of varying degrees of seniority. But its a book not filmed canon, so i cant force it down anyones throat.

[ September 28, 2001: Message edited by: CaptainMike ]


 
Posted by Balaam Xumucane (Member # 419) on :
 
I don't know whether Spock was supposed to be the first Vulcan in Starfleet, and I don't really care. I have my own supicions about how this "Temporal Cold-War" may alleviate many of the inconsistencies people are posting...

But enough Felderkarb about Vulcan primacy, back to the episode;
First the good: Liked the technology/sets/props a lot. The acting was pretty darned good and certainly above and beyond, say, "Encounter at Farpoint". The Suliban are going to be fun bad guys, and I loved that Tony "Tiny" Lister was playing a Klingon. The crew shows a lot promise both in terms of characters and actors. I like Scott Bakula a lot, but I am still having a hard time buying his character as a kind of a hard-ass. He just seems like such a nice guy. I don't know if the gel scene really needed to be in there, but I'm glad there was dialog happening (funny, but I do seem to be having trouble remembering exactly what that dialogue was...). The scene did seem a little too much. Maybe I'll like her better when the show gets its legs, but so far T'Pol is no 7of9 in my book.

And I'm sorry if you like it, but that title song really must go. It is sub-wretched. Cheapens the whole thing. "Dawson's Nebula" and all that...
 


Posted by targetemployee (Member # 217) on :
 
My mother: "Tiring."

Me: "There is something missing."
 


Posted by Tora Ziyal (Member # 53) on :
 
Has the actor who played Phlox appeared anywhere else in Trek? He sounded strangely familiar.

I'm still upset over the opening theme. It doesn't sound Star Trek! Reminds me more of those music videos they put together at Trek conventions. Give me a full orchestra any day.

The plot was okay, though I should probably watch it again since I got distracted several times during the show. I thought the females and Phlox had pretty strong characters, but the other guys are rather bland, though that's probably temporary. And that thing with Archer about not being afraid of the wind was kind of forced.
 


Posted by Shik (Member # 343) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Tora Ziyal:
And that thing with Archer about not being afraid of the wind was kind of forced.

"Captain's Log, supplemental. Henceforth, baked beans, burritos, & curry are forbidden from being served aboard ship. Most esPECially all together."
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
John Billingsley hasn't been in Trek before, but you might have seen him in something else. According to the IMDb, he's been in quite a few things before. More than any of the other cast members aside from Bakula...
 
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Okay, I finally saw the show tonight, and the "afraid of the wind" thing was just silly. When Archer says it to Mayweather, I mean. Of course they shouldn't be afraid of the wind. But no-one was talking about the wind. He was talking about an ion storm. And, a minute earlier, Archer and Tucker had just talked about how much repair the hull needed.

Afraid of the wind? No. Afraid of ion storms? Yes.
 


Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
I'm sure Ms. Sato is scared of just about everything
 
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Well, yes. But, in this case, she would be justified. :-)
 


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3