This is topic (Spoilers) Connections to The Original Series? in forum General Trek at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/3/2229.html

Posted by Siegfried (Member # 29) on :
 
I've noticed that a few Star Trek fans on the Internet have the opinion that Enterprise is completely overlooking The Original Series (and I'm not just talking about here at Flare). So I sat down and jotted down a list of things I saw in "Broken Bow" that have a direct connection to The Original Series. I'm sure that there are some more out there that I missed (in particular, the characterizations and dynamics amongst the crew). Anyway, here is what I have; please add any that you think I missed.

Starship Exterior:

Starship Interior and Set Designs:

Uniforms and Props:


 
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
I appreciate a lot of the things they did to give us a kind of feeling of homage.. unless its a red herring to throw us off the track that they are using the time-travel set up to abort TOS before it happens... just one thing:
quote:
The weapons for the Starfleet crew are pistol-style weapons that were used in TOS and in the TOS-era movies.

Quite dissimilar actually.. unless you mean they both series use pistols. But then, so does NYPD blue, yet with no TOS homage intended. And the nomenclature of said pistols is wierding us out.

You made a lot of good points though
 


Posted by Ryan McReynolds (Member # 28) on :
 
Sound effects: the ship doors have the same sound as those on the original, not later ships. The communicators also have the same chirpy-opening sound.
 
Posted by David Templar (Member # 580) on :
 
While people are talking communicators: did the communicator in "Broken Bow" simply lack range and power, or were the Sublibans actively jamming it? Just a personal curiosity.
 
Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
I also noticed the deication plaque on the bridge. It looks very similar to the TOS enterprises plaque.

Who wants to bet that it has a dedication of "To boldly go where no man has gone before." ?
 


Posted by Michael_T (Member # 144) on :
 
I think that the comm system was being jammed.
 
Posted by Siegfried (Member # 29) on :
 
Which communicator problems are you talking about? We have the first one that is just before Sato and Archer are captured by the renegade Suliban. I think that in this instance, Archer couldn't contact T'Pol or Tucker because they had already been captured. The second time was when Reed and Mayweather are trying to contact Archer and the gang on the roof of the trading complex. Mayweather says that there's a lot of interference messing around with the sensors and such.

As for my comments on the style of the personal weapons, I was simply noting that the style of the plasma and phase pistols marked a return to the pistol-style weapons used in TOS. The personal weapons in modern Trek were essentially wands with a curved handgrip. Star Trek is going back to more "aggressive" looking sidearms now (as compared to that same trend in "aggressive" looking rifles that began with First Contact).
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
At the beginning of TNG, perhaps. As Lee has documented for us, 24th century phasers got more...dare I say it, sensible, as time went on.
 
Posted by Commander Dan (Member # 558) on :
 
Your observations are well presented and fairly accurate, but I will argue one point with you:

quote:
Originally posted by Siegfried:
The windows on the new Enterprise, while more numerous than on the original Enterprise, maintain the same shapes as on the original’s: circular or horizontally rectangular.

I have noticed that some (O.K., one) of the “horizontal” windows (as seen from the interior set) are rounded at the corners and NOT rectangular.

I just had to find SOMETHING to complain about!

[ October 09, 2001: Message edited by: Commander Dan ]


 
Posted by Siegfried (Member # 29) on :
 
I think I'm correct in using the describer "rectangular" for these windows on the sets and model. But forgoing that for the moment, the main point I was getting across was the orientation of these windows is horizontal. The only starships we've seen with horizontally orientated windows are the Daedalus-class, Constitution-class (original and refit), Oberth-class, Miranda-class, and Excelsior-class. All of the later starships have these "rectangular" windows orientated vertically: the Ambassador, Galaxy, Sovereign, Intrepid, Nova, etc.
 
Posted by Commander Dan (Member # 558) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Siegfried:
the main point I was getting across was the orientation of these windows is horizontal.

Ah. O.K. then...


 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3