This is topic Subspace Weapons in forum Starships & Technology at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/6/6.html

Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
In Insurrection, we learn that subspace weapons are banned in the Federation. However, in the thread just next door to this one, we're analyzing the subspace effects of the common phaser. I've got a refined definition of what a subspace weapon is, and I'm looking for comments.

A subspace weapon is any device that utilizes subspace in a primary role. That is, like the warp drive, it generates a subspace field to produce whatever the effects of the weapon are. A phaser, on the otherhand, only has secondary subspace effects. While it shunts matter into subspace, and possibly pulls energy out of it, it doesn't utilize subspace itself to do this.

In other words, a subspace weapon "pulls" subspace into normal space, while a phaser only utilizes energies present in normal space to produce subspace effects. That is, a phaser manipulates an object to push it into subspace, while a subspace weapon manipulates subspace itself. (For more on how I'm picturing subspace, I'd direct you to Paul Cargile's theories regarding the subject, but they don't appear to be online quite yet.)

Subspace weapons are banned because, unlike phasers, they have the ability to change the nature of subspace in the area they are used, and therefore may cause damage to the very fabric of spacetime.

I guess that's a little less clear then I'd like it to be.

------------------
"I'll turn everything around and confuse you. I'll fix it so you can't remember what was true."
--
They Might Be Giants
 


Posted by Shipbuilder (Member # 69) on :
 
I thought that the reference to banned subspace weapons were specifically those that caused damage to the subspace continuum (effectively making it useless as a means of spaceflight). I think we're saying the same thing here which is that phasers don't actually do harm where as a 'subspace destruction' device obviously does.
 
Posted by Cargile (Member # 45) on :
 
Well, I think they do both. Some use subspace field to tear apart a target, and some damage or destroy subspace.

(Sol, I was waiting on a second return email from you which is why I didn't post the subspace theories before. . .)

But now I have the whole thing that I and Baloo brainstormed on, with three pictures right HERE.


------------------
I'm the only one who understands me, and I ire of my company.
--Paul Cargile



 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Whoops. Sorry about that. I do have some other stuff...I'll post it here and the group can collectively tear it apart.

------------------
"I'll turn everything around and confuse you. I'll fix it so you can't remember what was true."
--
They Might Be Giants
 


Posted by Cargile (Member # 45) on :
 
Either no one cares or there is nothing to disagree with?

------------------
The best thing about being a solipsist is that I'm the only one here.
--Paul Cargile


 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Hopefully the latter.

------------------
"The record of my unspeakable crimes, in previous lives, in previous times, indelibly stains the pages of history."
--
They Might Be Giants

 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3