This is topic Chekov&Ahwahnee update in forum Starships & Technology at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/6/682.html

Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Umm, how to break the news? Mike Okuda just sent a side-by-side shot of the models of USS Chekov, NCC-57302, and USS Ahwahnee, NCC-73620, and asked me not to distribute them any further except in the form of verbal descriptions. He is apparently quite serious about that limitation, and appears to be pursuing a book project that would feature these and other pics.

Okay, now for my 15 lines of fame: The models are resting on a table. The Ahwahnee is seen from about 45 degrees up and from 70 degrees starboard (if a view at the bow from dead ahead is 0 degrees). It is now possible to clealy see the way the lower pylon attaches to the nacelle; it perfectly mirrors the upper attachment. The pylons have few straight contours - they have slight dihedral from the upper central attachment point up and from the lower down, and they taper very slightly and smoothly towards the nacelles, the leading edge curving from a steep 45 degree angle to something like 50 degrees and the trailing edge starting with something a little more than 45 degrees but ending with the same 50 degrees. And just outboard of the phaser strip they perform a smooth 90 degree turn up or down to meet the nacelle.
The pylon hits the nacelle centerline so that a little more of the pylon extends aft of the "constriction coils" than forward of them.

No secondary hull can be seen in the picture, nor any other hints of vertical asymmetry.

*******************************************

The Chekov is seen from perhaps 70 degrees up, and perhaps 45 degrees from starboard. The model rests on the table on a nose-up attitude.

The Chekov has two nacelles identical to the marker pens of the Ahwahnee, except that standard red-streamer Starfleet decals are present on their upper sides. The pylons are square in planform, but have a gullwing structure (outboard part is horizontal, inboard goes down at perhaps 40 degree angle). Their chord is identical to the length of the forward part of the nacelle, and they attach to the inner flanks of the nacelles so that their leading edge is one-third "coil" length aft from the forward end of the "coils".

The primary hull seems to be an unaltered Galaxy saucer, with all the standard bridge features, windows, RCS units, phaser strip and markings and lifeboats in place - except that the main shuttlebay has apparently been sandpapered away.

The interesting part is the secondary hull. Imagine a 20-25 degree ramp beginning just aft of the bridge oval and extending aft, the upper surface spreading from bridge width in the forward end to the width of the removed main shuttlebay in the aft end. This ramp (counting from the aft edge of the bridge to the aft edge of the ramp) is as long as the Galaxy saucer is long. The sides of the ramp go down to the level of the saucer at a moderately steep angle, perhaps 75-85 degrees. Where they reach the level of the saucer, they meet with the lower ends of the pylons (I suppose this is also the bottom of the secondary hull, and it doesn't extend below the level where it meets the pylons). The stern surface of the secondary hull does not go down in the 75-85 degree angle of the side surfaces - instead, it forms an "undercut" like in the Enterprises, so that while the upper edge of the stern surface is about one pylon width aft from the pylon attachment point, the lower edge of the stern surface meets the trailing edges of the pylon roots.

Also, the leading edges of the pylon roots are flared to the trailing edge of the saucer by narrow "ledges" that have some windows in them - the actual ramp part of the secondary hull is windowless, and only has some thin red lining and grey rectangles that look a bit like the "spine" texturing of a Galaxy.

The end result is that the nacelle pylons start from saucer level and go up, so that the nacelles hover over the saucer. The forward tips are over the impulse engines, one "coil" length forward from the saucer trailing edge. The aft tips are one "coil" length aft from the stern of the secondary hull ramp.

Since the Chekov rests on a nose-up attitude, there probably isn't anything below the saucer level in the aft part of the ship. The lowest part of the ship would be the Captain's Yacht. If you looked at the Chekov in silhouette from straight up, you would see a standard Enterprise-like starship with a rather fat and angular secondary hull. If you looked from forward in silhouette, you'd see the saucer, a secondary hull completely above the saucer, and the nacelles above saucer level and even a bit above the upper level of the secondary hull.

Remember Eaves' first pass on the holoship for "Insurrection"? Substitute a Galaxy saucer and Cheyenne marker-pen nacelles, and place this canted "ramp hull" between the nacelles, and you get relatively close.

Timo Saloniemi

------------------

 


Posted by Starship Freak (Member # 293) on :
 
Fantastic! Finally we get some real info on the Chekov. I do hope we get to see that book soon!

------------------
"The Starships of the Federation are the physical, tangible manifestations of Humanity�s stubborn insistence that life does indeed mean something."
Spock to Leonard McCoy in "Final Frontier"

 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Addendum: this picture http://www.uni-siegen.de/~ihe/bs/startrek/articles/wolf359/chekov-chris.jpg by Chris would serve as the Chekov, if turned upside down, the nacelles moved forward, the pylons not angled back, and the smooth Galaxy neck replaced by that angular ramp thing (and the weapons pods removed).

I haven't seen any obvious Chekov candidates in the screengrabs yet, but the one that is in the background on the right edge of the viewscreen in the "Shelby scene" and has been so far identified as an Excelsior variant is a slight possibility. It doesn't look exactly right, though. In any case, we can be sure the ship we now call the Challenger class Buran (in the center of the picture with the three-naceller in the upper right corner and the E-D prominently on the foreground) cannot be the Chekov - the nacelles are too far back, and too close to each other, even if we are imagining the part about one of them being above and one below the secondary hull). So Buran is probably Buran.

In any case, the Chekov has a full Galaxy saucer yet the engines of a Cheyenne. To avoid a scaling problem, I'm now officially withdrawing my theory that the Cheyenne is smaller than her bridge module would lead to assume... The Ahwahnee and the Chekov have identical bridge modules, and the Chekov couples her module with a full Galaxy saucer, so postulating a non-Galaxy scale from now on would be futile. The Cheyenne is a big bugger!

Timo Saloniemi

[This message has been edited by Timo (edited March 21, 2000).]
 


Posted by Bernd (Member # 6) on :
 
Fantastic. If only I had the time, I would prepare a drawing of the Chekov and you could tell me what is still wrong about it.

------------------
"Species 5618, human. Warp-capable, origin grid 325, physiology inefficient, below average cranium capacity, minimum redundant systems, limited regenerative abilities."
Ex Astris Scientia
 


Posted by D-S on :
 
Timo: Does Okuda's limitations go as far as banning you from tracing the pics and then posting them?

if so looks like I'll have to wait till someone from the ASDB does the pics.
There will be 3D pics up as soon as the drawings are complete.
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
I'm mortally afraid of somehow making life difficult for Okuda as regards these pictures, and thus causing him to shut up. So I'll ask him specifically if he agrees to traced or otherwise "downgraded" images.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Bernd (Member # 6) on :
 
Here is a drawing in "lunch-break" quality:

*image removed, please ask me for URL and promise not to further distribute it*

I have used the New Orleans saucer, since only this one was available. I like it better anyway for this ship.

------------------
"Species 5618, human. Warp-capable, origin grid 325, physiology inefficient, below average cranium capacity, minimum redundant systems, limited regenerative abilities."
Ex Astris Scientia

[This message has been edited by Bernd (edited March 23, 2000).]
 


Posted by Harry (Member # 265) on :
 
Presumably, Okuda & co. used submarine-kits as well.
Here are some schematics from the type of ship they used, the Russian Typhoon Class. Does this look like the Chekov 2nd hull?
Opens in new window
Perspective view: Opens in new window


------------------
"When You're Up to Your Ass in Alligators, Today Is the First Day of the Rest of Your Life."
-- Management slogan, Ridcully-style (Terry Pratchett, The Last Continent, Discworld)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prakesh's Star Trek Site

[This message has been edited by Prakesh (edited March 21, 2000).]
 


Posted by Saltah'na (Member # 33) on :
 
Prakesh, your link is broken. Can someone fix this?

------------------
"My Name is Elmer Fudd, Millionaire. I own a Mansion and a Yacht."
Psychiatrist: "Again."

 


Posted by Harry (Member # 265) on :
 
Hey, while you where replying, I was still working on it. I just had a little struggle with HTML

------------------
"When You're Up to Your Ass in Alligators, Today Is the First Day of the Rest of Your Life."
-- Management slogan, Ridcully-style (Terry Pratchett, The Last Continent, Discworld)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prakesh's Star Trek Site


 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
Timo, don't pester him. (Okuda) I'd rather wait for a nice published version - and buy it rather than getting piecemeal traced types, that would probably discourage him from publishing some type of thing where we could see it.

Andrew

------------------
"Who wouldn't be the one you love
Who wouldn't stand inside your love." - Stand Inside Your Love, The Smashing Pumpkins
 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
Concur. I'd much rather have him know that we all respect his need for keeping it under wraps for now. I think that easing up will allow him to continue to be cooperative and friendly.

------------------
"A gathering of Angels appeared above my head. They sang to me this song of hope, and this is what they said..." -Styx

Aban's Illustration www.thespeakeasy.com/alanfore



 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
At the very least, it's good to see them getting serious about the ship book that I've been pushing for for so long...

"Jane's Starships!" (my title, based on the classic "Jane's" reference books, such as "Jane's Fighting Ships.")

Last I heard, be looking for this in late 2001 or early 2002. But, given the scarcity of info and the need to gather it all coherently, and CREATE what doesn't yet exist in a convincing manner, it may take longer)

------------------
"Nobody knows this, but I'm scared all the time... of what I might do, if I ever let go." -- Michael Garibaldi


 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
Just as long as they don't create starships to fill in the conjectural classes that look like the ones in the DS9 tech man or the new RPG Books from Last Unicorn Games. Those things are hideous!!!

By the by, what class of ship was the Chekov. I can't remember.

------------------
"A gathering of Angels appeared above my head. They sang to me this song of hope, and this is what they said..." -Styx

Aban's Illustration www.thespeakeasy.com/alanfore


[This message has been edited by Aban Rune (edited March 21, 2000).]
 


Posted by Spike (Member # 322) on :
 
Will these pictures be published in the Fact Files too? The FF are canon, aren't they? If just get #112. So I have Constitution, Excelsior, Ambassador, Galaxy, Sovereign, Defiant, Intrepid, Danube, Miranda, Constellation, Sydney, Oberth, Nebula, Daedalus, Prometheus, Freedom, Niagara, Olympic and "Aeon". What other classes will follow?

------------------
"No matter where you go, there you are."
 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Fitz: The shows and movies are canon. That's all. Stuff like the encyclopedia is semi-canon...we assume that everything in it comes from the show, but if there's a contradiction, the show wins. The Fact Files have included erroneous information in the past, so it tends not to be trusted.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"So, anyways, this is the 24th century. Starfleet officers have injections once a month or so so that they don't go getting each other pregnant. How would it be a problem for my character and Joral to be rocking the casbah?" - Fabrux
 


Posted by Starship Freak (Member # 293) on :
 
The Chekov is a springfield-class starship
USS Chekov - NCC 53702

------------------
"The Starships of the Federation are the physical, tangible manifestations of Humanity�s stubborn insistence that life does indeed mean something."
Spock to Leonard McCoy in "Final Frontier"

 


Posted by Spike (Member # 322) on :
 
Wasn't there a U.S.S. Springfield in a movie?

------------------
"No matter where you go, there you are."
 


Posted by Dat (Member # 302) on :
 
Fitz, it was in ST6, but that can't be considered the prototype of the Springfield class. Based on her registry, many people have conjectured that the Springfield might be either Miranda or Excelsior class. The Springfield class is based on Galaxy parts and so would not be in ST6.

------------------
7 alarm clock: "Do not touch me."
Dilbert: "Then how do I turn you off?"
7: "Believe me, I am plenty turned off."
 


Posted by Spike (Member # 322) on :
 
It's the same with the Korolev, isn't it? How can the Springfield be an Excelsior vessel with the registry NCC-1936?

Where can I get a clear picture of the Operation Retrieve-plans and the monitor in ST IV?

------------------
"No matter where you go, there you are."

[This message has been edited by Fitz (edited March 21, 2000).]
 


Posted by Dat (Member # 302) on :
 
Well, if not an Excelsior, than maybe a Miranda or even a Soyuz, but the Soyuz wasn't even introduced until a year later on TNG's 5th season.

------------------
7 alarm clock: "Do not touch me."
Dilbert: "Then how do I turn you off?"
7: "Believe me, I am plenty turned off."
 


Posted by colin (Member # 217) on :
 
Timo
Is the registry on the USS Chekov NCC-57302?
I think, not completely certain here, that there is a USS Springfield in the episode "Eye of the Beholder".

------------------

takeoffs are optional; landings are mandatory
 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
OK, our hopes and/or dreams for a 'starships' book...

-I'd really like to see some beauty shots of each ship examined - not just Doug Drexler's diagrams from the Encycs.

Margret Clark?? Was saying something over at Trekweb re Pocket Books and new ship/station artwork... She never went into detail - but it sounded like a lot of unneccessary counterarguments... If they are serious about such a book - and they want us to BUY it they have to impress us... If they can make delicious artwork like the E-A/E-D over the blue planet (A History in Pictures), The DS9 station/runabout and E-D with shuttle (for calendars/the making of DS9) and several beauty shots of the E-D in nebulas and such for diaries and calendars - they can do it for the other ships. She said that they needed the 'models' - crap - I reckon by the end of DS9 it was 100% CGI wasn't it... and the ships looked great! And they would be all saved in the Foundation's Computers. PLUS any physical model can be 'scanned' into computers - MUCH more easily than making CGI models from scratch. That covers all the ships...
I don't reckon the problem is models etc. its the red tape.

Andrew

------------------
"Who wouldn't be the one you love
Who wouldn't stand inside your love." - Stand Inside Your Love, The Smashing Pumpkins
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
I just received a reply from Okuda. He doesn't want any graphics related to the picture to be made or spread. And I agree with Aban and Andrew that pestering or ignoring him on this won't do good to anybody. It simply isn't worth it to "grab what we got and run", since Mike has so much to give to Trek fans (in books and other forums, even if he won't indulge us directly) and might not like being inconvenienced by what he has done already.

So please do not place any graphics on websites, or even spread news of the picture beyond this forum, no matter how unlikely it would be for Paramount or Pocket Books to go hunting for Mike's head if a "leaked" picture was spotted. The odds of that are not our problem, but they are Mike's.

All that said, Bernd is a mean artist And in fact the only thing he has trouble with as an artist is some red lines on ramps - the rest is 99% perfect! (It is a NO hull after all, just with a few extra windows - sorry about that.)

Timo Saloniemi

 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3