This is topic 'Enterprise' Concept Confirmed. in forum Starships & Technology at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/6/1201.html

Posted by Wes (Member # 212) on :
 
Please let it be NCV-1701...
http://www.trekweb.com has the story

------------------
Wes Button[email protected]
TechFX StudiosThe United Federation Uplink
------------------
I don't like Wesley Crusher.


 


Posted by Shik (Member # 343) on :
 
You don't read around this forum much, do you?

------------------
"I said 'You are, you are,
The only one who sees.'
I said, 'You are, you are'
The only strength I need.'"
---Kim Leaman, "Mary"

 


Posted by Wes (Member # 212) on :
 
You are right. I should read the damn boards before posting, I always make an ass out of myself. Anyway, doesnt NCV-1701 sound nicer then a prequel?

------------------
Wes Button[email protected]
TechFX StudiosThe United Federation Uplink
------------------
I don't like Wesley Crusher.


 


Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
The registry won't be "1701"

------------------
Star Trek Gamma Quadrant
Average Rated 8.32 out of 10 Smileys by Fabrux (with seven eps posted)
***
"Oh, yes, screw logic, let's go for a theory with no evidence!"
-Omega 11:48am, Jan. 19th, 2001
***
Card-Carrying Member of the Flare APAO
***
"I think this reason why girls don't do well on multiple choice tests goes all the way back to the Bible, all the way back to Genesis, Adam and Eve. God said, 'All right, Eve, multiple choice or multiple orgasms, what's it going to be?' We all know what was chosen" - Rush Limbaugh, Feb. 23, 1994.


 


Posted by Wes (Member # 212) on :
 
source? If it was to take place in the 29the century, (when NCV- regestries take place) wouldnt it make sence for the first timeship enterprise to be NCV-1701?

------------------
Wes Button[email protected]
TechFX StudiosThe United Federation Uplink
------------------
I don't like Wesley Crusher.


 


Posted by Michael Dracon (Member # 4) on :
 
Where have you been?? It's already official and anounced by Paramount. It's called 'Enterprise', and it is set in the 22th century...

------------------
"We have a good arrangement. He supplies the weapons, I use them."
- Blade

 


Posted by MIB on :
 
Altair, Read and weep:

Paramount has finally made it official in a press release from Paramount Network Television: the next 'Star Trek' series will titled 'Enterprise'. The show will star actor Scott Bakula as 'Captain Jonathan (not Jackson, as previously believed) Archer', "a physical and intensely curious captain with a bold personality." Interestingly, this limited press release DOES NOT confirm that the series' premise is, in fact, a prequel; however, if these long-speculated rumors are true, you can bet the rest of it is unless there's a huge curve ball coming.

That was from http://talk.trekweb.com/articles/2001/05/10/989546996.html As you can see. Paramount DID NOT say it was going to be a prequil series.

As for a NCV registry, that's a 29th centrey registry number prefix for Federation time ships. HEY! I had a thought! What if the rumor about Series V being a prequil series IS true. Sort of. What I mean is that if the NCV-1701 Enterprise is indeed a timeship, (With a registry starting with NCV it SHOULD be a time ship) maybe the pilot and a few episodes afterwards takes place before the birth of the federation. Not the entire series. Are you following what I'm saying? Like the pilot starts out with the U.S.S. Enterprise going back in time to investigate a mystery that baffeled the Federation for centeries and while they were doing that, they botch up the time line big time!

I also have a thought for what the U.S.S. would mean on a federation time ship. How about the United Space-Time Ship (fill in blank). It would make perfect sense because the ship travels through both space AND time......


------------------
"We have to get drunk immediately."----Gattaca

[This message has been edited by MIB (edited May 11, 2001).]
 


Posted by Michael Dracon (Member # 4) on :
 
Uhm, not to be rude or anything, but Lolita Fatjo confirmed the 22th century setting.

BUT: I'm won't be surprised if it turns out to be an elaborate scheme to mis-inform the audience. I certainly hope so. I'm not a big fan of the prequel idea, but I will however give such a series a chance.

------------------
"We have a good arrangement. He supplies the weapons, I use them."
- Blade

 


Posted by MIB on :
 
I agree with you Altair. I'm not a fan of the prequil series idea either. I really hope that the whole prequil thing is a ruse.

------------------
"We have to get drunk immediately."----Gattaca
 


Posted by Wes (Member # 212) on :
 
Who the hell is Lolita Fatjo? Paramound press spokesperson?

------------------
Wes Button[email protected]
TechFX StudiosThe United Federation Uplink
------------------
I don't like Wesley Crusher.


 


Posted by Wes (Member # 212) on :
 
oh... pre-production coordinator?

------------------
Wes Button[email protected]
TechFX StudiosThe United Federation Uplink
------------------
I don't like Wesley Crusher.


 


Posted by Teelie (Member # 280) on :
 
Although she did come out with claiming to be misquoted on Scott Bakula being the Captain so her being misquoted on the date wouldn't be surprising either.

------------------


 


Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :
 
So let's see... the leaked casting sheet had almost the exact name of the captain on it correctly, 5 male roles (one a black male) and 2 female roles (one an asian female), but the premise on it is wrong?

Let's swing this back towards the Starships topic.

Leaving the specific technologies we're gonna find in the 22nd century aside for a second, what kind of ship do you guys think this "Enterprise" likely to be. Big? Small? A "flagship"? Old? New?

------------------
"And as it is, it is cheaper than drinking."
-DT on arguing with Omega, April 30

 


Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :
 
Something very good looking and cool but that always gets its ass kicked before suddenly winning the battle in the end of the episode, like all Trek ships before it.

-Torpedoes, captain?
-No, transfer aux. power to holosuite!! They won't anticipate that, hahaah!
-Torpedoes now, captain?
-No, we could kill them with that. Prepare to start prepearing a pseudo-evasive manouver!
-Aw sod it, I'll do it myself! *boom*
-Huh, we won. But you'll go to the brig for that, young lady. Young boy, escort her to the brig. Young security officer will know what to do with her.
-Fine, whatever, as long as we're alive.

------------------
Don't kill me, I'm charming!

[This message has been edited by Nimrod (edited May 12, 2001).]
 


Posted by Harry (Member # 265) on :
 
The 'new' Enterprise?

No phasers (back to the kitschy lasers!)
No holodecks
No replicators
No Starfleet logos
No "USS" or "NCC"
No "1701"
No Warp 7,8 or 9
No arrowhead-communicators
No LCARS
No glowy things, except for the 'Buzzard' ramscoops

Hopefully, they'll adhere to Jefferies philosophy: "Keep the important stuff inside".
But since Eaves seems to like to show of hardware, this is unlikely. Thank god we still have Okuda to give us sets and a decent computer interface.

------------------
"Fuck L Ron Hubbard and fuck all his clones.
Fuck all those gun-toting
hip gangster wannabes."
-Tool, Ænima

---
Titan Fleet Yards - Harry Doddema's Star Trek Site


 


Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
No holodecks? You mean we won't have a "holodeck malfunctions and traps half the senior staff inside during a crisis" episode?! Dear God -- the horror! The horror -- !

You know, Prakesh, I can't help but feel that the majority of this list is just really stupid nitpicking (sorry -- but...).

No arrowhead communicators? Who cares? They were always used inconsistently thoughout TNG, DS9 and VOY! Sometimes you'd have to tap them to open a line of communication, sometimes not. How'd those damn things work, anyway?

No Starfleet logo? The horror! The horror!

Oh my dear god, we won't have the top three warp speeds. The show will suck without those. It can't be a Star Trek series unless you can get to warp nine point nine nine nine nine seven.

Cool! No replicators! Maybe we'll have a cool cook goin' around. Methinks this could also lend itself better to story ideas ... "Captain, we need to send a landing party to the surface to get some food supplies... it'll be dangerous..."

Unless the USS and NCC designations were in use BEFORE Starfleet was created, and simply transfered over from whichever organization was using them before. Would make sense, since Starfleet seems dominated by Earth. "Hey, we're going to create a unified military. As a show of grace, we're going to donate Earth Fleet's fifty ships to Starfleet..."

Did DS9 have 1701? No. DS9 did great. Let's not go around assuming the series will suck because the Enterprise's registry isn't 1701.

No LCARS? Who cares?

No glowing things? Maybe some stuff in the engine room, but, uh, ... ? Who cares ... ?


------------------
Star Trek Gamma Quadrant
Average Rated 8.32 out of 10 Smileys by Fabrux (with seven eps posted)
***
"Oh, yes, screw logic, let's go for a theory with no evidence!"
-Omega 11:48am, Jan. 19th, 2001
***
Card-Carrying Member of the Flare APAO
***
"I think this reason why girls don't do well on multiple choice tests goes all the way back to the Bible, all the way back to Genesis, Adam and Eve. God said, 'All right, Eve, multiple choice or multiple orgasms, what's it going to be?' We all know what was chosen" - Rush Limbaugh, Feb. 23, 1994.

[This message has been edited by JeffKardde (edited May 12, 2001).]
 


Posted by Omega (Member # 91) on :
 
Just a thought, but is it possible that the cast listed aren't the SENIOR officers on the ship, but the ONLY officers on the ship? Could it be that small?

------------------
"How do you define fool?"
"I don't attempt it. I wait for demonstrations. They inevitably surpass my imagination."
- CJ Cherryh, Invader
 


Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :
 
If they have any decency left in their wretched bodies they WILL portray the klingons WITHOUT ridges, as Worf confirmed that they in fact DID look different back then.
Maybe these "new" old klingons can regain some of the dignity they lost to Gowron, that crazy mother.

------------------
Don't kill me, I'm charming!


 


Posted by MIB on :
 
ummmm. I had a thought. I don't see how this can be a prequil series set on a ship named Enterprise. In Star Trek there were only 9 Enterprises. The Enterprise NCC-1701, Enterprise NCC-1701-A, B, C, D, and E. There was the aircraft carrier Enterprise and the Space shuttle Enterprise. Finally we have a space ship called Enterprise that was built before the NCC-1701 but if memory is serveing me well, it was nothing more than a dinky sublight ship. I can't remember where I read about the sublight Enterprise, but I do remember that you could see a picture of it in ST: TMP. It looked like a long rod with two rings around it. Unless Series V is about this ship, I don't see how it can be a prequil series. (A ship with only sublight capabilities would be kind of boring. No seeking out new life and new civilazations sense it would take to long to get anywhere.) Unless, of course, Berman decides to destroy a little more continuity and throw in yet another Enterprise some time after the sublight ship, but before the NCC-1701

In all honesty, I am hoping for a NCV-1701 Enterprise or, as corney as it sounds, a NCC-1701-G Enterprise or something like that.

------------------
"We have to get drunk immediately."----Gattaca

[This message has been edited by MIB (edited May 12, 2001).]
 


Posted by Shik (Member # 343) on :
 
"Prequil?" Is that a new type of cold medication?

:::sighs::: IS it me, or are we getting stupider in here. Oh wait. Colleges are letting out...which means schools are letting out.

That explains it.

"You've got a brain, son. Use it for something other than filler to keep the air pressure from caving in your skull." --Kenny Bell

------------------
"Boinky ensued, and a great time was had by all." --Book of Nigel, Chapter 4, verse 32


 


Posted by devin.clancy on :
 
We know nothing canonical about the space ship Enterprise except how it looks. The only reference to it ever was the picture on the wall in TMP.

And just to drive this board crazy, they could go and insert a picture from the Prequel series in the Special Edition DVD.

------------------
___________
Devin Clancy
 


Posted by Mark Nguyen (Member # 469) on :
 
THat *would* be kinda cool, woudln't it?

Anyway, regardless of what the new ship looks like, it's hardly the first time they've revised an Enterprise. Remember, the E-C looked nothing like its model on the E-D conference lounge wall... Wasn't that one reason why they got rid of that mural thing in the fifth season?

Mark

------------------
"Why build one, when you can have two at twice the price?"

- Carl Sagan, "Contact"



 


Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
Actually, Nimrod, Worf said: "We don't like to talk about it." He didn't say why the Klingons in D-7 didn't have ridges, he didn't explain it at all. So there's no reason why the prequel Klingons couldn't have ridges.

Omega, that's an interesting thought about the senior staff being the only officers aboard, but somehow, given Trek's enlisted track record, I think we'll still see some nameless ensigns getting blown up every week ...

------------------
Star Trek Gamma Quadrant
Average Rated 8.32 out of 10 Smileys by Fabrux (with seven eps posted)
***
"Oh, yes, screw logic, let's go for a theory with no evidence!"
-Omega 11:48am, Jan. 19th, 2001
***
Card-Carrying Member of the Flare APAO
***
"I think this reason why girls don't do well on multiple choice tests goes all the way back to the Bible, all the way back to Genesis, Adam and Eve. God said, 'All right, Eve, multiple choice or multiple orgasms, what's it going to be?' We all know what was chosen" - Rush Limbaugh, Feb. 23, 1994.

[This message has been edited by JeffKardde (edited May 12, 2001).]
 


Posted by Matrix (Member # 376) on :
 
For once I'll keep my mouth shut, I have no clue on what I should think on this new Enterprise.

------------------
The whole concept of Survivor is that nameless adults go at each other and try to outwit each other. In reality after the first episode of the show, each one will make a least over a thousand dollars for making appearences on some talk show. The first survivor, the Gay Guy now works at E.T. as a Survivor Consultent, where he gives advice to the new survivors. Not only did he win a million dollars that he now makes twice as much as what most of us make in 5 years.

I highly doubt that hes gay, made his own son run, and walk naked around the site. It was all tactics to get him win a million dollars. Right now I bet hes fucking some girl. Jerry from the second Survivro is something because everyone talks alot about her. The whole concept of Surivivor sucks, and it should end with the second one.



 


Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
Er.

This became a Survivor rant? Or is that your sig?
 


Posted by Harry (Member # 265) on :
 
About my previous post:

Those points were *not* things I don't like about the new ship.
It is more of a checklist: the new ship has to adhere to these points to be believable. It was just to show that they'll probably screw it up.

Just a little misunderstandment.

------------------
"Fuck L Ron Hubbard and fuck all his clones.
Fuck all those gun-toting
hip gangster wannabes."
-Tool, Ænima

---
Titan Fleet Yards - Harry Doddema's Star Trek Site


 


Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
Ahh - ! Gotcha.

------------------
Star Trek Gamma Quadrant
Average Rated 8.32 out of 10 Smileys by Fabrux (with seven eps posted)
***
"Oh, yes, screw logic, let's go for a theory with no evidence!"
-Omega 11:48am, Jan. 19th, 2001
***
Card-Carrying Member of the Flare APAO
***
"I think this reason why girls don't do well on multiple choice tests goes all the way back to the Bible, all the way back to Genesis, Adam and Eve. God said, 'All right, Eve, multiple choice or multiple orgasms, what's it going to be?' We all know what was chosen" - Rush Limbaugh, Feb. 23, 1994.


 


Posted by Tech Sergeant Chen (Member # 350) on :
 
The ringship appeared in more than just TMP. According to a Star Trek - The Magazine article, it's based on an early Matt Jefferies design for 1701. The article is reproduced here:
http://thefsd.tripod.com/sttm/1701.html

The admittedly non-canon Spaceflight Chronology, an official tie-in with TMP, says this was not a sublight ship, but a Declaration-class starliner with a cruising speed of Warp 3.2.

------------------
Never give up. Never surrender.
 


Posted by Harry (Member # 265) on :
 
So, these rings are likely to be two giant warp coils.

------------------
"Fuck L Ron Hubbard and fuck all his clones.
Fuck all those gun-toting
hip gangster wannabes."
-Tool, Ænima

---
Titan Fleet Yards - Harry Doddema's Star Trek Site


 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Probably not unlike the Vulcan ships in "Unification II".

------------------
Lister: "Cat, what are you doing?"
Cat: "I'm courting."
Lister: "Courting who?"
Cat: "Whoever shows up!"
-Red Dwarf, "Me�"
 


Posted by MIB on :
 
[Quote]The admittedly non-canon Spaceflight Chronology, an official tie-in with TMP, says this was not a sublight ship, but a Declaration-class starliner with a cruising speed of Warp 3.2.[End Quote]

hmmmmm. A starliner named Enterprise. Wheather this info is correct or not, the ring ship was the ONLY enterprise that was cruising the galaxy before TOS. Unless Bermen decides to destroy more Star Trek continuity. A 'prequil' series would HAVE to take place on this ship. But a super slow, apparently non-starfleet (I'm assuming it's non-starfleet because it doesn't have any starfleet markings. IE: a registry number.) starliner? *sigh* That would be kinda lame.

------------------
"We have to get drunk immediately."----Gattaca
 


Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
Erm.

Could someone tell me where someone says, "this is the only previous starship Enterprise?"

Or, did you forget the NASA shuttle Enterprise? God-damn NASA, destroying Star Trek continuity! The BASTARDS!

You guys must've had a fit when Saavik was played by two different people. Or the Klingon ship's bridge changed between III & IV.

Chill.

------------------
Star Trek Gamma Quadrant
Average Rated 8.32 out of 10 Smileys by Fabrux (with seven eps posted)
***
"Oh, yes, screw logic, let's go for a theory with no evidence!"
-Omega 11:48am, Jan. 19th, 2001
***
Card-Carrying Member of the Flare APAO
***
"I think this reason why girls don't do well on multiple choice tests goes all the way back to the Bible, all the way back to Genesis, Adam and Eve. God said, 'All right, Eve, multiple choice or multiple orgasms, what's it going to be?' We all know what was chosen" - Rush Limbaugh, Feb. 23, 1994.

[This message has been edited by JeffKardde (edited May 13, 2001).]
 


Posted by MIB on :
 
I meant before TOS, but after 'real' modern time. As for the changing Klingon bridges and two different Romulans played by the same guy; I really don't gave a rat's ass about that.

------------------
"We have to get drunk immediately."----Gattaca

[This message has been edited by MIB (edited May 13, 2001).]
 


Posted by Shik (Member # 343) on :
 
It's not necessarily the "only" one. There's actually a precedent.

The TNG bas-relief went from nuclear carrier to Constitution. No shuttle, not ringship, nothing. Nothing before the carrier, either. So fidget room exists.

------------------
"Boinky ensued, and a great time was had by all." --Book of Nigel, Chapter 4, verse 32
 


Posted by MIB on :
 
No. That's not true. In ST: TMP you can see a wall in the rec-room that had pictures and presumably brief histories of all the previous Enterprises that came before the NCC-1701. There was the Aircraft carrier Enterprise, The Space shuttle Enterprise, The "Ring ship" Enterprise, and the NCC-1701 herself. If there was another Enterprise, wouldn't it have showed up on the rec-room exhibit? I would think so.

------------------
"We have to get drunk immediately."----Gattaca
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
What he's saying is that the TNG wall display excluded the sailing ship, space shuttle, and ring ship. So, why couldn't there have been ships that the TMP display excluded?

As a matter of fact, the US navy has had two aircraft carriers named Enterprise. So the CV-6 (the original non-nuclear carrier) is already missing from the TMP display. Who knows what else might be...?

------------------
Lister: "Cat, what are you doing?"
Cat: "I'm courting."
Lister: "Courting who?"
Cat: "Whoever shows up!"
-Red Dwarf, "Me�"
 


Posted by Shik (Member # 343) on :
 
A brigantine, a bark, & Masao's Yorktown-class carrier. That's just the USS Enterprises, mind you; there have been some HMS Enterprise as well.

------------------
"Boinky ensued, and a great time was had by all." --Book of Nigel, Chapter 4, verse 32
 


Posted by Matrix (Member # 376) on :
 
I'll change my sig.

Anyway could it be possible that Starfleet did build a another Enterprise before the TOS version? Of course the ship will have a different number possibly in the three digit range. This is possible because why would anyone count that ship as being THE newest Enteprise anyway. In that same REC room they don't have the other carrier Enteprise, which in my opinion is a more famous one than the nuclear one.

------------------
The whole concept of Survivor is that nameless adults go at each other and try to outwit each other. In reality after the first episode of the show, each one will make a least over a thousand dollars for making appearences on some talk show. The first survivor, the Gay Guy now works at E.T. as a Survivor Consultent, where he gives advice to the new survivors. Not only did he win a million dollars that he now makes twice as much as what most of us make in 5 years.

I highly doubt that hes gay, made his own son run, and walk naked around the site. It was all tactics to get him win a million dollars. Right now I bet hes fucking some girl. Jerry from the second Survivro is something because everyone talks alot about her. The whole concept of Surivivor sucks, and it should end with the second one.



 


Posted by Tech Sergeant Chen (Member # 350) on :
 
It's been a long time since I last watched TMP and I really don't want to haul out the laserdisc (bastards aren't going to make me shell out again for DVD copies). But I could have sworn there was some kind of sailing vessel in the display.

In OUR history, CV 6 had a more distinguished history than CVN 65. No telling in the Trek universe. 65 would have been still in service during the Eugenics War and possibly World War III and might have racked up a very impressive combat record.

I was always under the impression that the Klingon bridge changed because Scotty was one goddamn miracle worker.

------------------
Never give up. Never surrender.
 


Posted by MIB on :
 
*sigh* whatever. In all honesty I'm trying to build a false world for myself. A world where series 5 ISN'T a prequil series. Eventhough it hasn't been confirmed to be a prequil series, I have this sinking feeling that it is. So please let me live on in my dream world. *sniff. sob.*

------------------
"We have to get drunk immediately."----Gattaca
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Chen: Yes, there was.

------------------
Lister: "Drop dead, Rimmer."
Rimmer: "Already have done."
Lister: "Encore."
-Red Dwarf, "Kryten"

[This message has been edited by TSN (edited May 14, 2001).]
 


Posted by Siegfried (Member # 29) on :
 
Here are my thoughts on the previous Enterprises debate. Neither the mural in the Enterprise-D observation lounge nor the picture alcove in the recreation room on the refit Enterprise are wholly correct.

As has been pointed out earlier, the Enterprise-D's mural had an Enterprise-C that differed fairly significantly from the actual Ambassador class model. In addition, it neglected the "Declaration class" starliner and the NASA space shuttle. The refit Enterprise's pictures showed the aircraft carrier, shuttle, starliner, and original Enterprise.

However, the Enterprise has a proud history as wooden naval vessels. http://home.att.net/~enterprise1701d/sailships/ is a list and description of some of the early sailing ships named Enterprise. None of these were ever illustrated on the mural or pictures (although one was portrayed in the holodeck scene of Star Trek: Generations).

I'm mentioning this to make the point that the possibility of a pre-TOS/pre-Starfleet Enterprise that is not a "Declaration class" starliner existing is plausible. We've never had anyone sit down and completely list all the Enterprises of history anywhere in Star Trek.

------------------
God (using a Devil hand puppet): Yaagh! I'm the Devil! I'm evil! I'm spooky! I'm dark! And I'm evil! Gimme an "E!" Gimme a "V!" Gimme a "U!" Gimme an "L!" What's that spell? Evil! Goooo EVIL!
Devil: Hey, yo, that shit ain't funny!
--from Tatsuya Ishida's Sinfest

Founder, president, CEO, CFO, COO, under-secretary general, mascot, and caterer of the APAO

 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
In addition to Siegfried's and others' listings, there's a third aircraft carrier Enterprise missing from the displays - the one that we saw in ST4. It definitely wasn't CV-6 nor CVN-65, but a CVN of a fictional type.

I think I once suggested this already, but I think the TMP display could be "grouped". Each of those five display screens could be more than an inert painting. Instead, each would portray the full histories of ships named Enterprise and belonging to a certain category. The first one would display sailing ships Enterprise. The second one would display modern warships Enterprise, including the three carriers and possible other seagoing modern Enterprises. The third one would display primitive spacecraft Enterprise, including the space shuttle and potential other craft. The fourth display would then show advanced spacecraft Enterprise, including the ring ship plus umpteen others. And finally, the fifth display would show the first starship Enterprise, before her refit.

The level of detail would increase display by display, while the number of vessels would decrease - from the dozens of sailing ships in the first display to the single starship in the fifth.

And the previous user of this display had simply left it so that the fourth screen displayed the ring ship, instead of the soon-to-become-famous hero ship of Series VI.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Shik (Member # 343) on :
 
Yeah...the ST4 carrier was actually USS Ranger (CV-61), a Forrestal-class conventionally-powered carrier.

------------------
"Boinky ensued, and a great time was had by all." --Book of Nigel, Chapter 4, verse 32
 


Posted by Harry (Member # 265) on :
 
Maybe Starfleet decided that Series V was crap and covered the entire existence of the new old Enterpise up.

------------------
"Fuck L Ron Hubbard and fuck all his clones.
Fuck all those gun-toting
hip gangster wannabes."
-Tool, Ænima

---
Titan Fleet Yards - Harry Doddema's Star Trek Site


 


Posted by Wes (Member # 212) on :
 
Remember? The "Starfleet" logo we see in the 24th century was originally the NCC-1701 logo, in other words the Enterprise logo. I belive we will see this logo in Enterprise.

------------------
Wes Button[email protected]
TechFX StudiosThe United Federation Uplink
------------------
I don't like Wesley Crusher.


 


Posted by Reginald Barclay on :
 
You shouldn't even expect any semblance of continuity with the Trek universe as we know it. This is Braga we're talking about here. They've already officially announced that they will violate established continuity not once, but twice, in one fell swoop. The early Klingons will be knobby heads. This not only invalidates TOS, but also Worf's "We don't talk about it with outsiders."
 
Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
How does that invalidate Worf's "we don't talk about it with outsiders?" Please, explain.

BTW: it DOESN'T violate seeing Koloth, Kor, and Kang with bumpy heads in DS9, yet smoothies in TOS. Does it now?

------------------
Star Trek Gamma Quadrant
Average Rated 8.32 out of 10 Smileys by Fabrux (with seven eps posted)
***
"Oh, yes, screw logic, let's go for a theory with no evidence!"
-Omega 11:48am, Jan. 19th, 2001
***
Card-Carrying Member of the Flare APAO
***
"I think this reason why girls don't do well on multiple choice tests goes all the way back to the Bible, all the way back to Genesis, Adam and Eve. God said, 'All right, Eve, multiple choice or multiple orgasms, what's it going to be?' We all know what was chosen" - Rush Limbaugh, Feb. 23, 1994.


 


Posted by Reginald Barclay on :
 
Actually, even the Trials and Tribble-ations episode scene introduced problems. How can Bashir and O'Brien not know that Klingons were once smooth-headed? This is not some alternate reality, since Worf's comment confirmed they were once smooth. Bashir in particular should have studied about Klingons sometime in medical school and would have read about some strange change that befell the race in the 23rd century.

How this invalidates Worf's comment is that Berman & Braga have now said Klingons have always been knobbies, consistent with what GR said. If so, then that whole scene in T & T doesn't make sense anymore.

Unless the Klingons from TOS were all surgically altered to be smoothies, including Kang, Kor, Koloth and all of their personnel. Then later they were returned to their original appearance. Why? Who knows? B & B couldn't care less and they've said so. See Bernd's editorial at Ex Astras Scientia. Enterprise is off to a bad start and it hasn't even aired yet.
 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
If they've always been 'nobbies' then what about the Romulans.

And if they've always been 'nobbies' a way to explain Worf's comment and the smooth heads might be - the Klingon Empire went through a 'fasion craze'... probably by some Ferengi... where everone was filing down their 'ridges'... I'm sure not everyone will be wanting to reveal that Earth had a thin leather tie craze in the 1980's!!

Another explanation... still a 'plaugue'/'virus' but that it's the opposite effect - for a few years nearly all the klingons's ridges began to reduce - maybe a problem with their ships!?!

Maybe an Emperor at the time had been smooth headed - and in 'respect' Klingons everywhere began filing down their ridges.

------------------
Homer: I'm gonna miss Springfield. This town's been awfully good to us.
Bart: No, it hasn't, Dad. That's why we're leaving.
Homer: Oh, yeah. [pokes his head out the window] So long, Stinktown!
 


Posted by Austin Powers (Member # 250) on :
 
Somehow I'm getting the terrible feeling that I'm beginning to lose interest in Star Trek - at least the current installments. I liked TOS, loved (and still do) TNG, hated DS9 in the beginning but took a liking to it in the end.
Voyager has a few (very few) good and even less great episodes. Overall rather poor quality.
And since they have confirmed that Enterprise will be a prequel I'm not sure if I'm very curious to see it.

MIB, I'm with you. I'm dreaming my little dream about Enterprise (STAR TREK: ENTERPRISE) being set in the future. Sob.

I think they are killing Star Trek with this show - and they know it - why else would they have left "Star Trek" out of the title?

------------------
Kryten: Pub? - Ah yes. A meeting place where people attempt to achieve
advanced states of mental incompetence by the repeated consumption of
fermented vegetable drinks. - Red Dwarf "Timeslides"


 


Posted by Matrix (Member # 376) on :
 
A couple of months ago, the TV Guide had an article that said that the producers were "milking the show". They even suggested that Paramount should stop at Voyager and wait a few years wehn popularity gets highter then introduce a new series.

------------------
The whole concept of Survivor is get your average Joe and put him/her on the show and see how they react. Afterwards even though they did not win they make money by appearing on shows. There is no point in having to win a million dollars! They will make that amount in 2 months after appearing on 100 different shows!
 


Posted by Wes (Member # 212) on :
 
You're overanalizing it.

------------------
Wes Button[email protected]
TechFX StudiosThe United Federation Uplink
------------------
I don't like Wesley Crusher.


 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
Totally agree with you Matrix/TV Guide.

------------------
Homer: I'm gonna miss Springfield. This town's been awfully good to us.
Bart: No, it hasn't, Dad. That's why we're leaving.
Homer: Oh, yeah. [pokes his head out the window] So long, Stinktown!
 


Posted by Shik (Member # 343) on :
 
"Overanalizing?" Ew.

Sounds painful. And unsanitary.

------------------
"'I don't CARE who started it, I'm tired, and I WANT QUIET!!!!! Or I'm going to come up there and flatten the BOTH of you!' And he meant it. And we'd stop. Or he would." --Foreign policy as laid down by First of Two's dad
 


Posted by Mikey T (Member # 144) on :
 
Well, now I wish Voyager had another season comming up instead of the new series...

------------------
"When I said to get involved in the gay community, I didn't mean to sleep with everyone in it."
Michael_T
 


Posted by Lee (Member # 393) on :
 
Ouch. . .

------------------
Phasers

 


Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :
 
Getting back on track, is there any updated info on this new Enterprise?

------------------
"Babies haven't any hair;
old men's heads are just as bare;
between the cradle and the grave
lies a haircut and a shave."

Samuel Hoffenstein
 


Posted by Starship Freak (Member # 293) on :
 
I�m hoping we�ll see it soon. Didn�t someone say we�ll see some footage from "Enterprise" with the Voyager finale "Endgame"?

------------------
"The Starships of the Federation are the physical, tangible manifestations of Humanity�s stubborn insistence that life does indeed mean something."
Spock to Leonard McCoy in "Final Frontier"



 


Posted by Michael Dracon (Member # 4) on :
 
Yes, there will be a behind the scenes promo right after 'Endgame'. At least that's what Trektoday reported...

------------------
"I don't poke my head into business world too much. All I care about is making the show. And naked stuff."

- Joss Whedon, creator of Buffy the Vampire Slayer

 


Posted by Daniel (Member # 453) on :
 
You people do know that it's been confirmed as a prequel, yes? According to my local TV guide and I think the NY Times one, it's a prequel to TOS set 100 years in the past, as has been rumored. No info yet on characters etc. AFAIK.

------------------
"A celibate clergy is an especially good idea because it tends to suppress any hereditary propensity toward fanaticism."

-Eleanor Arroway, "Contact" by Carl Sagan

 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Uh...you can go see the official character list, or part of it anyway, at startrek.com.

------------------
OH NO< THE OLD MAN WALKS HIS GREEN DOG THAT SHOTS PINBALLS!~!!!
--
Jeff K
****
Read three (three!) chapters of "Dirk Tungsten in...The Disappearing Planet" and nothing at all will happen.



 


Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :
 
Dannyboy, I was talking about the ship in particular.

------------------
"Babies haven't any hair;
old men's heads are just as bare;
between the cradle and the grave
lies a haircut and a shave."

Samuel Hoffenstein
 


Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :
 
Oh, and to hopefully head off any dissapointment, by the sounds of things only UPN 9 from New York will have this "behind-the-scenes" look at Enterprise. But I could be wrong.

Original news story on this
------------------
"And as it is, it is cheaper than drinking."
-DT on arguing with Omega, April 30

[This message has been edited by The_Tom (edited May 23, 2001).]
 


Posted by Harry (Member # 265) on :
 
New info on inside of starship Enterprise (the new old one, that is):
control panels are going to resemble contemporary NASA styled controls (@ TrekToday.com). I see nothing wrong with that.

------------------
"You know, putting up a tent is like making love to a beautiful woman. You undo the zip, pop in your pole and slip into the old bag."
- Swiss Toni, The Fast Show (British comedy show)
---
Titan Fleet Yards - Harry Doddema's Star Trek Site


 


Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :
 
That actually sounds very very cool! White painted hulls and bulkheads with classic crome flip-switches for "missiles" and lots of bolts! And LCD-TFT monitors!!!
And that yellow-black striping on dangerous equipment and such. I'm beginning to look forward to this.

I just finished "The Abyss - DVD Special Edition" and am feeling pretty filled with joy and love!
And those white submersibles always looked cool, so I'm relating here...

------------------
"Babies haven't any hair;
old men's heads are just as bare;
between the cradle and the grave
lies a haircut and a shave."

Samuel Hoffenstein
 


Posted by Hobbes (Member # 138) on :
 
I've kept out of most, if not all talk on Enterprise. Because I don't know what to say exactly. I don't want to judge something before I see. I mean the show itself could actually be good...if you're willing to forget about 30 years of Trek history.

I guess Berman & Braga want to recreate Star Trek in their own vision. "We're going back to the fundamentals of Star Trek [mean while throwing out everything Roddenberry established]."

------------------
Captain Archer: "Leap me out of here Al."
Transporter Chief: "Uh, captain, it's 'beam' not leap, and stop calling me Al."
This post sponsored by the Federation Starship Datalink.

[This message has been edited by Hobbes (edited May 23, 2001).]
 


Posted by Reginald Barclay on :
 
Imagination? We don't need no stinking imagination.

Why should Zimmerman & company come up with something new when they can just use stuff off the shelves? Just because controls from the '50s look ridiculous today doesn't mean today's stuff will look ridiculous in 150 years, right?

If Majel is so upset about Enterprise, does this mean we'll finally get a series without that annoying computer voice?
 


Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :
 
Perhaps even four point seat belts! At least for the tactical officer, if they even have weapons.

You know, there once was a dream of Trek seat belts, but it was so fragile that if anything more than a hwhisper was uttered about it, it would vanish!!! So come, let us whisper for a while...

------------------
"Babies haven't any hair;
old men's heads are just as bare;
between the cradle and the grave
lies a haircut and a shave."

Samuel Hoffenstein

 


Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :
 
Well, it would appear that New York trekkers didn't get Enterprise footage after all:

quote:
UPN 9 News in New York City aired this segment May 23, 2001. Despite their promises of "extensive coverage" of the finale, and a behind-the-scenes look at Enterpise, their Trek coverage was even shorter and fluffier than usual. There was no Enterprise coverage to speak of. Don't know if they were lying in their promos, or an expected interview didn't come through.

*sigh*

Well, back to waiting to see what the 22nd century might look like.

------------------
"And as it is, it is cheaper than drinking."
-DT on arguing with Omega, April 30

 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3