This is topic New Brunswick Class Long Range Explorer in forum Designs, Artwork, & Creativity at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/7/170.html

Posted by Fabrux (Member # 71) on :
 

New Brunswick Class Long Range Explorer
Length: 549 metres
Beam: 324 metres
Height: 157 metres
Warp Drive: Dilithium regulated Matter/Antimatter Reactor Assembly
Max Warp: 9.99975
Impulse Engines: One Large Fusion Reactor
Max Impulse: 0.55c
Crew: 200 officers, 300 enlisted
Computers: LCARS interface, bio-neural gelpack memory
Armaments: 9 Type-XII phaser arrays; 8 pulse phaser cannons (nacelle mounted; 4 fore, 4 aft); 6 torpedo launchers (photon and quantum equipped)
Shuttlebays: 1
Support Craft: 17
About Ship: The New Brunswick Class was started in 2350 as a long range explorer-type vessel. Fifty vessels were authorized. After the first twenty were built, Starfleet decided to take the remaining thirty spaceframes and put them in storage as the Galaxy Class came into service. After the Borg incursions and the Dominion War, Starfleet decided to complete all spaceframes put into storage, and the New Brunswick class was revived. It was decided that the spaceframes would be upgraded during construction, and all existing ships would be upgraded as well. New systems were added, and nacelle mounted pulse phaser cannons as well. The New Brunswick class has proven itself as a reliable explorer.

Ships of Class:
U.S.S. New Brunswick NCC-50500
U.S.S. Fredericton NCC-50501
U.S.S. Saint John NCC-50502
U.S.S. Moncton NCC-50503
U.S.S. Mirimachi NCC-50504
U.S.S. Bathurst NCC-50505
U.S.S. Cambellton NCC-50506
U.S.S. Edmunston NCC-50507
U.S.S. Lancaster NCC-50508
U.S.S. Nerepis NCC-50509
U.S.S. Welsford NCC-50510
U.S.S. Clarendon NCC-50511
U.S.S. Wirral NCC-50512
U.S.S. Hoyt NCC-50513
U.S.S. Geary NCC-50514
U.S.S. Rothesay NCC-50515
U.S.S. Kennebecasis NCC-50516
U.S.S. Fairville NCC-50517
U.S.S. Quispamsis NCC-50518
U.S.S. Public Landing NCC-50519
U.S.S. Greenwich NCC-50520
U.S.S. Martinon NCC-50521
U.S.S. Ketepec NCC-50522
U.S.S. Belmont NCC-50523
U.S.S. Morna NCC-50524
U.S.S. Buctouche NCC-50525
U.S.S. Cap-Pel� NCC-50526
U.S.S. Richibucto NCC-50527
U.S.S. Belledune NCC-50528
U.S.S. Gagetown NCC-50529
U.S.S. Oromocto NCC-50530
U.S.S. Newcastle NCC-50531-------Under Construction
U.S.S. Shediac NCC-50532---------Under Construction
U.S.S. Dieppe NCC-50533----------Under Construction
U.S.S. Sussex NCC-50534----------Under Construction
U.S.S. Lepreau NCC-50535---------Under Construction
U.S.S. Lorneville NCC-50536------Under Construction
U.S.S. Maces Bay NCC-50537-------Under Construction
U.S.S. Musquash NCC-50538--------Under Construction
U.S.S. Pennfield NCC-50539-------Under Construction
U.S.S. St. Stephen NCC-50540-----Under Construction
U.S.S. St. George NCC-50541------Under Construction
U.S.S. St. Andrews NCC-50542-----Under Construction
U.S.S. St. Martins NCC-50543-----Under Construction
U.S.S. Westfield NCC-50544-------Under Construction
U.S.S. Grand Bay NCC-50545-------Under Construction
U.S.S. Kingston NCC-50546--------Under Construction
U.S.S. Hampton NCC-50547---------Under Construction
U.S.S. Apohaqui NCC-50548--------Under Construction
U.S.S. Riverview NCC-50549-------Under Construction
U.S.S. Blacks Harbour NCC-50550--Under Construction


------------------
This post will self destruct in 10 seconds

[This message has been edited by Fabrux (edited January 15, 2000).]
 


Posted by Elim Garak (Member # 14) on :
 
I'm not much for quad-nacelled vessels, but as far as they go, this one's rather interesting!

Oh, and what a comprehensive list of names.

------------------
Elim Garak: "Oh, it's just Garak. Plain, simple Garak. Now, good day to you, Doctor. I'm so glad to have made such an... interesting new friend today." (DS9: "Past Prologue")
 


Posted by Enterprise (Member # 48) on :
 
Way cool.......

------------------
Brandon "Enterprise" Grasmick
Commanding Officer, USS Sovereign (NX-74222)

"Captain, the Sona crew are willing to negotiate a cease fire. It may have something to do with the fact that we have 3 minutes of air left."
-- Worf

Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges
-- In time of war the law falls silent.

 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Wouldn't travel at 0.75c cause time dialation problems? And are you sure you want to call the phasers Type XII?

------------------
Frank's Home Page - free pencil with every armadillo!
 


Posted by The359 (Member # 37) on :
 
*thinks for a second*

Uh....don't you have 51 ships listed?

------------------
"I am Sci-Fi"
-The 359


 


Posted by Fabrux (Member # 71) on :
 
Garak: And I only had to look in an atlas for one!
Frank: You're consfusing me
The359: True

------------------
This post will self destruct in 10 seconds

 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Confusing? How?

------------------
Frank's Home Page - free pencil with every armadillo!
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Frank is trying to spare you from the lecture I am inevitably bound to give whenever someone uses the phrase "type XII" "phaser" and "starship" in the same sentence.

You know, I should add this one to the FAQ.

Suffice it to say, should a type XII phaser exist, it would be too large to mount on a starship. At least, on any normal sized starship.

External voices: "But that's just your opinion, Sol! Sure, it's borne out by the evidence, but don't you think you need an IMHO in there somewhere? Hmm? Hmm!?"

Sheesh, ok. I like to think that such a statement should be taken as self-evident.

Um...ignore the last two sentences.

------------------
"And much of Madness, and more of Sin, and Horror the soul of the plot."
--
The Conqueror Worm, by Edgar Allan Poe

[This message has been edited by Sol System (edited September 19, 1999).]
 


Posted by Hobbes (Member # 138) on :
 
Type-XI is considered a planetary emitter right?

Good job on the design and work though. I someday hope my kitbashes can look as great.

------------------
"Let's make sure that history never forgets the name...Enterprise."
Federation Starship Datalink - Yet another site based on the popularity of starships.
 


Posted by Fabrux (Member # 71) on :
 
Seems to me there was a little discussion about type-XII phasers a while ago... In any event, it remains the same. And Frank, I don't get the time dilation thingy.

The359: I just remembered, the prototype doesn't count.
Hobbes: Practice makes perfect!

------------------
This post will self destruct in 10 seconds

 


Posted by Sunspot (Member # 77) on :
 
Time dilation is when the amount of time that passes for the crew of a starship/whatever is less than that which passes in realspace (ie-Earth). This is bad, because after, say a week of travelling at some really high impulse, the Earth may have experienced a year or more, while the crew experienced only a week.

For more information, refer to Page 78 of the TNG Tech Manual. (Section 6.2 RELATIVISTIC CONSIDERATIONS)


As for the phasers, Type XII is WAY to large an emitter to be on a Starfleet ship. Type X is the starship sized emitter (Well, the most recent sized one). I think that X-II will be acceptable to Sol.

------------------
�T� eres que lo como!
 


Posted by Krenim (Member # 22) on :
 
*Physics student steps in*

At near-c speeds, time acts differently. Say you're at 0.75c for one hour. After you go back to rest, you will find that everyone else thinks that you've been travelling for an hour and a half.

------------------
"Alright... Who wrote 'Beavis and Butthead rule' on the back of my skull?"

- Captain Jean-Luc Picard, Star Trek Parody, The Critic


 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
There's really no need to add anything to the X at all. You can have a phaser much more advanced than those on, say, the Enterprise D, and still call them X'es.

------------------
"And much of Madness, and more of Sin, and Horror the soul of the plot."
--
The Conqueror Worm, by Edgar Allan Poe
 


Posted by Fabrux (Member # 71) on :
 
I don't have the TNGTM *ducks*

------------------
This post will self destruct in 10 seconds

 


Posted by Black Knight (Member # 134) on :
 
That's way too confusing. You go like 6, 7, 8, 9, and then stop at ten? Type-11 planetary sure. Then make the next more advanced one type-12. You need something to distinguish the Ent-D emitters from the Ent-E. They can't keep getting more advanced and then call them the same thing. I wan't a distingtion.
I don't see the probelem with Type-12.

------------------
A-"Dippidy Doo." Q-"What forms on your dippity early in the morning?"--Johnny Carson



 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
The types seem to denote size, not how "advanced" they are or anything.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"Yes, I routinely run any car with Canadian plates off the road. It makes it easier to yank them out, blind them, and put them to work in my underground salt mine." - Simon Sizer
 


Posted by The359 (Member # 37) on :
 
Type distinguishes size/power, not advancement.

It's actually pretty obvious. Just look at this:

Type I Hand Phaser (Cricket):
Originally used in TOS, able to connect to Type II for more power. Still used in TNG, and though it is more advanced, it's still called a Type I.

Type II Hand Phaser:
Actually looks like a 'gun'. Bigger and more powerful then the Type I. Most of the time the Type I can fit within the Type II. Again, the phaser from TOS and from TNG, relativly the same size, are both called Type II, even though the TNG version if more advanced

Type III Phase Rifle:
Largest and most powerful hand held phaser available. Bigger and more powerful then Type I and II. Though never officially called a Type III in TOS, it is assumed to be called this, so, yet again, the TNG version is called the Type III, just like the TOS version, but is more advanced. Also, note, there is a Type IIIA and a Type IIIB, as evidenced by the DS9TM. The Type IIIB is more advanced then the Type IIIA.

Type IV Shuttle Mounted Phaser:
Larger then all hand held phasers. First seen in TNG, therefore, there is no comparison to TOS.

Type X Starship Mounted Phaser:
Currently known as the largest phaser array capable of being carried by a Federation Starship. These phasers are definatly more powerful then the Type I, II, III, and IV listed above.

Type XI (X+) Planetary/Starbase Mounted Phaser:
Currently known as the largest and most powerful phaser built. Listed in the TNGTM, the X+ (most likely referring to numbers ABOVE 10) phasers are deamed suitable only for planetary surface instalation. Apparantly, the design was able to be mounted to starbases, as evidenced from the DS9TM.

As you can see, as the Roman Numeral goes up, the phaser becomes larger and more powerful, therefore, it's safe to assume, the Type XII would be too large to be handled by a starship. By my guess, a starship bassed off the Ambassador class would use a phaser roughly the size of a Type VIII or IX. The Sovereign class also most likely uses Type IX or X.

Note, as I said with the Type III Phase Rifle, there is a Type IIIA and a Type IIIB, and the IIIB is more powerful. Therefore, if you want a phaser like a Type X, but a lot more advanced, then maybe you should called it Type XB or XC, or however far down the alphabet you want to go to show more advancement.

Also, it would be good to right now state the 'scales' used by starfleet and such, and how groupings work. Here are the three major ones I can see:

CLASS: Denotes vessel or technology that are all relativly the same in design. Evidence: Practically all Constitution class starships look exacly the same, with exception of minor differences.

TYPE: Denotes size of vessel or technology. Evidence: Type II phasers are larger and more advanced then a Type I. Also, a Type III shuttle is larger then a Type II (Class-9 Shuttles are Type II as well)

MARK (Mk.): Denotes advancement. Evidence: A Mark X tricorder is more advanced then a Mark IX Tricorder

Now, I know these don't agree with what has been said on screen (Like shuttles being called 'Type'), but I believe this is a bit of mistake, and the terms 'Mark', 'Type', and 'Class' aren't fully understood by Paramount, and they are just spitting out whatever sounds good. Therefore, from what I said, Shuttles should be referred to by Class, not by Type.


------------------
"I am Sci-Fi"
-The 359

[This message has been edited by The359 (edited September 19, 1999).]
 


Posted by Black Knight (Member # 134) on :
 
I see your point about the phasers, but I think that the Type-9 is a class-2 shuttle. The class might be that it is a smaller faster personell shuttlecraft and Type-9 means that it is the current design up to stardate x.x and is used aboard X ships. Classes of shuttlecraft are just different than starships. So the class will be the major classification like Explorer or something and the type with change with each new design.

------------------
A-"Dippidy Doo." Q-"What forms on your dippity early in the morning?"--Johnny Carson



 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
It's important to note that higher types are only more powerful amongst phasers from the same era. For instance, a 24th century type II is probably stronger than a 23rd century type III, and so on.

------------------
"And much of Madness, and more of Sin, and Horror the soul of the plot."
--
The Conqueror Worm, by Edgar Allan Poe
 


Posted by Bernd (Member # 6) on :
 
While there is no real reason why a starship couldn't have type XII phasers, I wouldn't exaggerate the fire power which is expressed by the type number in essence. I guess you refer to the newly built ships anyway?

0.75c would be possible with much help from the subspace driver coils, but not useful, considering that relativistic effects occur whenever the ship is at impulse instead of warp.

30 support craft? You should give the ship another shuttlebay.

*gets an Atlas of New Brunswick and controls all the names *

------------------
*Obscure humorous pretentious Gaelic-Latin signature*
Ex Asterige Scientia
 


Posted by Fabrux (Member # 71) on :
 
Noted. *makes appropriate changes*

------------------
This post will self destruct in 10 seconds

 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3