This is topic If you like the Nebula-class... in forum Designs, Artwork, & Creativity at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/7/795.html

Posted by Lobo (Member # 669) on :
 
...then take a look on this ship(s).

three versions.
Weapons pod with sopport pylons.


Weapons pod with support strut.


Without pod. (my favorite)


I will still post the other views.
What do you think?
cya
lobo
 
Posted by Mark Nguyen (Member # 469) on :
 
I think you should post the other views. RIGHT NOW. [Smile]

Mark
 
Posted by Lobo (Member # 669) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mark Nguyen:
I think you should post the other views. RIGHT NOW. [Smile]

Mark

I must make them first. [Smile]
Lobo

[ January 18, 2002: Message edited by: Lobo ]
 
Posted by Ace (Member # 389) on :
 
Very interesting...

I'm wondering how those extra "Galaxy class" type deflector dishes look from the side. They look very nifty from the front!
 
Posted by The Red Admiral (Member # 602) on :
 
That's totally awesome, I like it. Let's see some more.
 
Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
I like the second version...I too am wondering how those deflectors on top are going to look. They a bit unnecessary...but I'll reserve judgement [Smile]
 
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
i second the notion that the extra deflectors are unnecessary.. but those bulges would look awesome as fore-facing shuttlebays, specializing the ship some as a carrier.
 
Posted by Ace (Member # 389) on :
 
Carriers..in Star Trek...must resist...memories of underpowered Akira design...
 
Posted by Lobo (Member # 669) on :
 
Ok here an try of the side view:
I know its not the best.


Cya
Lobo
 
Posted by Mark Nguyen (Member # 469) on :
 
That's kinda neat - the saucer is wider than it is long!

Mark
 
Posted by Lobo (Member # 669) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mark Nguyen:
That's kinda neat - the saucer is wider than it is long!

Mark

Yeah thats right! I will change that.
Cya
Lobo
 
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Well, figure out how it looks from the top before you go "fixing" it. Right now, it looks okay the way it is, but the top view may or may not change that opinion...
 
Posted by David Templar (Member # 580) on :
 
The front view remind me of Samus's ship in Metroid.
 
Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
Ahhh, Metroid. It was so cool when I found out Samus was a chick. I forget what her ship looked like though.

I second the motion...do a top view and see how the saucer looks that way before you change anything.
 
Posted by Lobo (Member # 669) on :
 
Hi.
I will make an new side view. This side view is too bad.
Cya
Lobo
 
Posted by Austin Powers (Member # 250) on :
 
Hey it's not that bad. I'm curious to see what you make of the top view.
 
Posted by Rogue Starship (Member # 756) on :
 
Hey, I agree with everyone else. The front view kicks all! But the side view sucks. Make the Secondary hull longer. It will make everything come into perportion.

RS
 
Posted by The Antagonist (Member # 484) on :
 
Wow. Lobo, once again I have to say you have outdone yourself.

Its nice to see somebody that focuses on the asthetics of ship design instead of the technical details. To be honest, your creations are nothing revolutionary or radical in form or arrangement, however they are magnificent simply because you know how to put those forms to eye-catching work. The detail you put into your drawings is what I love most about your work.

Keep it up, Lobo!

P.S.
What do those two extra deflector dishes do? Are they even deflector dishes at all? When I first saw the front view, it is what interested me most about this design. While pondering what its function(s) could be, I remembered back to (correct me if I am wrong) Best of Both Worlds Part I, where the Enterprise used its primary deflector array to basically create a "Big bertha" style plasma weapon. This is the only practical application I can see for these, unless there is a possibility I am missing.
 


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3